Showing posts with label Transformation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Transformation. Show all posts

Saturday, June 21, 2014

War ON Poverty


China, India and Nigeria with populations of 1.3 billion, 1.1 billion and 160 million respectively have the highest population of Poor People in our world today. In relative terms, given that China and India each has over 1.0 billion people, Nigeria with about 160 million people has the highest percentage of poor people (over 112 million, 70%).

Poverty is a Global problem. Given available human, material, financial and technology resources in our world today, there should be no poor person in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, USA and rest of the World.

The world poverty problem cannot be solved without solving Africa poverty problem. Africa poverty problem cannot be solved without solving Nigeria poverty problem. Nigeria poverty problem cannot be solved without tackling the problem of family business and family farming in Nigeria.

Nigeria, Africa and World poverty is the greatest tragedy of our time because Nigeria, Africa and the World is each too rich to be poor and too poor to be rich. To break the vicious poverty circle, there is a need to organize, orientate and discipline people irrespective of age, tribe, race, education, class, gender, religion, political or any other interest, to be the MOVING FORCE Driving the TRANSFORMATION of Society out of the poverty vicious circle, in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, USA and rest of the World.

REINVIGORATING WAR ON POVERTY 

We read with interest a recent assessment of US President Johnson’s War on Poverty, by a scholar from the University of Virginia. Our view is that there has been some Progress and some Setbacks; that should all relevant Stakeholders agree to shift focus away from Problems and Fixing Blame and shift focus towards Fixing Problems and Practical Solutions, America and indeed the World can Conquer Poverty.
2014 is the 50th Anniversary of President Johnson’s War on Poverty. There is a need for a New Type of assessment of the War on Poverty focusing on what is working and how it can be improved; what is not working and how it can be corrected; where America is now and where America need to be if the War on Poverty is to be Won on successful and sustainable basis, by the 75th Anniversary of President Johnson’s War on Poverty.
 
In the work towards Ending Hunger and Poverty in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and World; there is a need to Fight and WIN 4 Wars from Village to Global levels: War on Poverty, Hunger, Disease and Environmental Degradation (PHDE). In each war there is a need to Fight and WIN 11 Battles: Battle Against Arrogance, Ignorance, Indifference, Incompetence, Indiscipline, Injustice, Intolerance, Inequality, Interference and Impunity (A9IC).

3PCM APPROACH 

Dr. Hellmut Eggers, German, 86 in July 2014 created Project Cycle Management, PCM Approach to Benefits Focused Evaluation in 1987. 27 years after, had there been increasing convergence between Original PCM Approach Intention and Reality, many of the problems highlighted by Evidence Based Policy Development Network, EBPDN, Members in April 2014 Discussion on How Research Influence Policy will not exist. Today, only Hellmut and Lanre et all at ISPE / EAG are practising Original PCM.

Lanre Rotimi created Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management, 3PCM and Comprehensive Systems Reform, CSR Approach to Benefits Focused National and International Development in 2009. In 2012 Hellmut and Lanre’s Versions of Original PCM were merged into 3PCM Approach to Benefits Focused National and International Development Cooperation.

Within 3PCM Approach, National and International Development Cooperation – Policy, Program, Project Interventions; 3PIs’ are Designed and Delivered as a set of Integrated ACTIONS as One:-
1     1. Consultative Research
2   2. Diagnostic Studies
  3. Prescription
      4. Surgery
5    5. Recovery Management

That is 3PCM Initiative – Design and Delivery of 3PIs’ using (1) – (5) as One and 3PCM Training – Design and Delivery of 3PIs’ using (1) – (5) as One Training are two sides of the same coin. Neither can stand alone.

(1) – (5) are interlinked, interconnected and interdependent. Any 3PI where one or more of the 5 Actions are not undertaken at  minimum certain levels of Effectiveness and Efficiency cannot achieve set Goals and targets at all not to talk of on time. Documents relating to 3PCM Approach, including Generic MAF and Testing MAF available upon request.

COMMUNITY ECONOMIES – ROOT PROBLEMS 

We define a Community as a Political Constituency or Geo Political Space from as small as a Neighbourhood of a few Streets to the entire World - Globe. ISPE / EAG has identified Root Problems in Community Economies from Neighbourhood to Global. The particular mix of specific Community Economy problems will vary depending upon its unique circumstances.

The Root Problems are:-

Front End Diseases
1   1. Unemployment
2   2. Underemployment
3   3. Unemployability
4   4. Hunger
5   5. Poverty
6   6. Security
7   7. Opportunity
8   8. Evaluation
9   9. Training
1   10. Research
     11. Consultancy
     12.Contracting

Back End Diseases
1   1. Leadership
     2. Governance
     3.  Advocacy
     4. Environmental Degradation
     5. Media
     6. Technology
     7. Religion
     8. Rules
     9. Partnership
     10. Practice
     11. Disease
     12. Approach

Opportunistic Disease
1   1. Corruption

IMPLEMENTING STUDY REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS – ROOT PROBLEMS

ISPE / EAG have identified that flaws and failures implementing Sound Recommendations set out in Study Reports; Conference Reports; Parliamentary Committee Reports; Regulatory Agency Reports, arise from the following Root Problems:-
1   1. Lack of National and International Development Cooperation Approach as Robust as 3PCM Approach.
  2.  Lack of National and International Development Cooperation Stakeholder Groups Platform as robust as NEHAP Platform
3. Lack of National and International Development Cooperation Service Providers Consortium Partnership as Robust as NEHAP Partnership
4   4. Lack of National and International Development Cooperation Stakeholder Groups Advocacy as robust as NEHAP Campaigns
5   5. Lack of Movement for Positive Development Change Driving National and Global Collective ACTION as Robust as NEHAP Revolutions.
 6. Lack of National and International Development Cooperation Statutory Regulatory Agencies as Robust as Statutory Regulatory Agencies suggested in NEHAP Initiative. 
7    7. Lack of Neighbourhood to Global Institutional Architecture for all relevant National and International Development Cooperation Stakeholder Groups suggested in NEHAP Initiative.

FIGHTING AND WINNING WARS AND BATTLES

The Solutions to Root Problems are:-
1  1. Correct Consultative Research; Diagnostic Studies; Prescription; Surgery and Recovery Management; CRDPSRM.
      2.  Fight and Win War on PHDE and Battles Against A9IC

War on PHDE and Battles Against A9IC need to be fought and Won in each Community from Neighbourhood to Global where the 25 Root Problems of Community Economies as applicable and the 7 Root Problems of Implementing Study Reports are tackled on successful and sustainable basis.

The War on Poverty in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, USA and rest of the World – War on PHDE and Battles Against A9IC can be WON if relevant stakeholders adopt New Priorities and face New Direction. Positive Change in this regard can start from Citizens and Universities in both Developed and Developing Countries across our World today.

In view of the above, there is a need for all who genuinely believe that Dream of Nigeria, Africa and World without Poverty can be a reality to join like minds in the establishment and operation of a Poverty Elimination Platform focusing the MOVING FORCE towards achieving needed TRANSFORMATION from Village to Global levels in all Countries – Developed and Developing in our World today.

MEMBERSHIP

The Poverty Elimination Platform will have 3 categories of Members
 1) Partner Members: Financial Partners – contributing cash or kind, Media Partners, Banking Partners, Transport Partners, Hospitality Partners, Technology Partners, Medical Partners, Legal Partners – contributing services free or concessionary.    
     2) Volunteer Members – contributing Time / Effort; Talent / Skills, Treasure / Money
c   3) Beneficiary Members – enjoying services


STRUCTURE

We propose the Poverty Elimination Platform start from Nigeria with active presence in communities, all 774 LGAs’, all 36 States and FCT (Federal Capital Territory), 6 Geo Political Zones, National and International levels. Membership is open to Nigerians and Friends of Nigeria within and outside Nigeria.

We propose further that ISPE – International Society for Poverty Elimination, be adopted as the Poverty Elimination Platform.

The ISPE Platform compliments the NEHAP Platform. A Member of ISPE Platform may or may not be a Member of NEHAP Platform and vice versa.

ABOUT ISPE

Name: International Society for Poverty Elimination            

Motto: Poverty Elimination: A Worthy Task

Address: 5, Moses Orimolade Avenue
             Ijapo Estate, Akure
             Ondo State, Nigeria
             West Africa.


 Focal Person : Mr. Lanre Rotimi

Vision : A World Without Hunger and Poverty

Mission :
To organize, orientate and discipline people irrespective of age, tribe, race, education, class, gender, religion, political or any other interest, to be the MOVING FORCE Driving the TRANSFORMATION of Society out of the poverty vicious circle, in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, USA and rest of the World.
Nature:
Philanthropic, Non Profit, Non Religious, Non Political, Non Governmental Organization


Aims and Objectives:
1.     To provide arduous sensitization, orientation of Nigerians for the purpose of transforming Nigerian Society to a better Society.
2.     To promote and protect a Rights Based Approach to delivering Basic Services, Infrastructure Services and Support Services.
3.     To inculcate social techniques and practices for conflict resolution and consensus building in Nigerians.
4.     To sensitize the rural and urban people on the merits of governance and sustainable development etc.

Structure:
Neighbourhood Chapter, Ward Chapter, Community Chapter, Local Government Chapter, Kingdom Chapter, State Chapter, Zonal Chapter, National Chapter, ECOWAS Chapter, Africa Chapter, Commonwealth Chapter, World. This is the same Structure with NEHAP Platform but the NEHAP Service Providers Consortium Partnership starts from Local Government Chapter.

Operational Segments and Services:
Segments:
Development; Diplomacy; Defence and Security; Elections and Democracy; Monitoring, Evaluation and Assessment; Service Delivery; Procurement; Human Rights; Knowledge and Communication

Services:
Basic Services:
Water; Sanitation; Health; Education; Enterprise; Food/Agriculture; Housing; Sports; Entertainment; Clothing / Personal Care
                      
Infrastructure Services:
Electricity; Energy; Telecoms; Transport (Air, Road, Rail, Water);    ICT/Internet

Support Services:
Justice Administration; Tax Administration; Anti Corruption; Anti Poverty;   Changing Attitude and Behaviour at Scale; Institutional Reform; Campaigns, Coalitions; Revolutions; Platforms

The Segments; Basic Services; Infrastructure Services and Support Services Agenda Items make up the Thematic Areas within which ISPE Platform Members will work. This is the same for NEHAP Platform which is a Consortium Platform for Professionals on NEHAP Initiative Service Providers and Service Users sides.

Approach:
One Worldwide Approach – 3PCM: Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management including SAF – Standard Assessment Framework, SBF – Standard Budget Framework, SCF – Standard Competencies Framework and LBBF - Lessons Learning and Lessons Forgetting Bridge Building Framework etc.

Activities:
   Advocacy; Research; Policy, Program, Project Interventions; Monitoring; Evaluation; Others

If you require some clarification or additional information, please send email to:-

Lanre Rotimi
International Society for Poverty Elimination, ISPE /
Economic Alliance Group
                                                                                          

Monday, November 15, 2010

Reinforcing and Reinvigorating Implementation of G20 Summit Declarations

Matters Arising from Previous Posts

Good Cause, Good Content, Good Visibility

Good Thinking, Good Participation, Good Action

At Development Change Champions Blog, we take each of the above fundamental issues seriously and we encourage shift away from focus on problems and passing blame and shift towards focus on solutions and opportunities.

We have Good Cause and Good Content. We seek Good Visibility. Please share your thoughts on way forward.

We have Good Thinking. We seek Good Participation and Good Action. Please share your thoughts on way forward.

Reordered Publishing of Articles

The Article scheduled for publication today is “Rethinking, Redesigning, Rebuilding International Institutions Advocacy Systems”. This Article will now be published on 22 November 2010 to allow for today’s article. When it is necessary to reorder publishing schedule to allow for posting of articles, we consider to be of higher priority in the National / International Development Cooperation, we would do this and amend our list of Articles for publication accordingly.

Today’s Article:

Reinforcing and Reinvigorating Implementation of G20 Summit Declarations

As G20 Leaders end 5th G20 Summit, the time is now for them to genuinely recognize that the mutual prosperity and mutual security of all UN Member Countries – Rich and Poor; Developed and Developing; Big and Small; is a fact that should be taken more seriously, if full implementation of G20 Summit Declarations are to be taken more seriously by them – in the interest of their own citizens and citizens of other countries, particularly billions of the world’s poor.

It is pertinent to note that Current Global Recession is Linked to World Food, Fuel, Finance and Terrorism Problems; that improved Global Collective Action for tackling these World problems is a major reason for expanding G8 to G20; that from the 1st G20 Summit hosted November 2008 hosted by US to the 4th G20 Summit hosted by Canada earlier in the year, many decisions that ought to have been fully implemented by now are either partially implemented or not implemented at all; that as long as Lessons are not ACTUALLY Learnt in the implementation of past G20 Summit declarations; it would be discovered, sadly with possible adverse consequences, that come the 6th G20 Summit in 2011, some 5th G20 Summit decisions that ought to have been fully implemented would still be partially implemented or not implemented at all. Given the magnitude and complexity of the issues that G20 Leaders have to address, would it be a good idea to reduce G20 Meetings from twice a year to once a year starting in 2011?

It is clear that sustainable solutions to Global Recession, World Food, Fuel, Finance and Terrorism problems greatly depends on reinvigorating and reinforcing G20 Global Solutions to Global Problems Initiative in ways that include adequately Comprehensive Political Solutions, Economic Solutions and Technical Solutions to these real and complex world problems on the ground and this greatly depends on reinvigorating and reinforcing MDGs’. Paris Declaration, PD; Accra Action Agenda, AAA; One UN Imitative / Delivery as One, DaO; in ways that include adequately comprehensive Political Solutions, Economic Solutions and Technical Solutions to these World Vision real and complex Village to Global problems on the ground.

Yes, G20 has done much since November 2008 to date. However, the increasing pain and misery – largely avoidable, of Citizens in France, UK, US, other Developed Countries and Developing Countries, indicates that much remains to be done and much more could have been achieved at less cost and less pain, had there been full implementation and effective monitoring, evaluation and assessment of the full implementation of G20 Summits 1 – 4 Declarations. This Flaw is a Scar on the Conscience of G20 Leaders; National and International Media Executives and the Boards of Global, Regional and National: Research, Planning, Statistics, Implementation, Monitoring, Evaluation and Assessment Professional Bodies.

The UK Evaluation Society 2010 Conference 22 – 23 November 2010 would be looking at Global Recession, World Food, Fuel, Finance and Terrorism problems as it affects the UK and contributions UK Evaluators could make to help tackle UK National Development and International Development Challenges. There is a session devoted to innovative and creative solutions to these complex problems as it affects UK relations with African and Asian Countries. A set of innovative an creative solutions has been left out that makes the UKES 2010 Conference incomplete, if this Conference is to make optimum contribution towards removing this Scar on the Conscience of these Political Leaders and Professional leaders. It is in UK interest, G20 interest and rest of the World interest, that decision to exclude this set of innovative and creative solutions be reviewed. Also the International Development Evaluation Society, IDEAS, 2011 Global Assembly would looking at the same problems from a Global Perspective and in our view would achieve more should IDEAS Board recognize that the underlying fundamental  issues go beyond Development Evaluation and so take special care to focus the General Assembly on innovative and creative Political Solutions, Economic Solutions and Technical Solutions.


If we can be frank:-
1.    Reinvigorating and Reinforcing the implementation as well as the monitoring, evaluation and assessment of the full implementation of G20 Summit Declarations, MDGs’, PD, AAA, One UN Initiative / Delivery as One, greatly depends on changing the way things work in the Governments and Societies  of G20 Countries, particularly US, UK, France, Germany, India, China, Brazil and Saudi Arabia; Non G20 Countries particularly Nigeria and Egypt; G20 Institutions particularly UN Headquarters, All UN Agencies Headquarters, Regional Offices and Country Offices; World Bank Group – all 5 Institutions; World Bank Group – Independent Evaluation Group – all 3 Institutions; IMF, EC and Non G20 Institutions particularly OECD.
2.    The sustainable success of Transformations and Movements Driving Village to Global Strategies, Policies, Programs and Projects within (1) greatly depends on identifying, empowering, promoting and protecting Professionals in all relevant Disciplines / Specializations, who have the intellectual capacity to grapple effectively with the challenges of National Development Cooperation and International Development Cooperation – Professionals who are genuine Development Change Champions with adequate levels of expertise, experience, exposure and energy to help Political leaders and Professional Leaders to jointly achieve World Visions ambitions.

In view of the above, we wish to make the following calls:-

A. Political Leaders - Countries
1.    We call on Political Leaders and Professional Leaders to quickly agree on a Roadmap to 6th G20 Summit Consultation Process and Negotiation Process that ensures Lessons Learnt implementing G20 Summits 1 – 4 are actually Learnt in the full implementation and monitoring, evaluation and assessment of the full implementation of 5th G20 Summit Declarations.
2.    The One Mind from anywhere in the World with the most advance Village to Global Transformational Core Ideas that is sufficiently “All Encompassing, All Embracing and Ambitious” to help them achieve G20 Global Solutions to Global Problems Initiative Ambitions linked to achieving MDGs’; PD; AAA and One UN Initiative / Delivery as One Ambitions, to which all relevant Services / Sectors / Issues within each of the 5 World Visions – Village to Global Transformations Ideas would be anchored; identify the minds with the Services / Sectors / Issues Ideas and go further to empower, promote and protect these innovative and creative minds.

B. Political Leaders – International Institutions
We call on Political Leaders, Heads of Institutions, Senior Administrators and Senior Technocrats of International Institutions particularly UN, World Bank, IMF to recognize that as long as they fail to demand adequate levels of Transformation within National Development Cooperation and International Development Cooperation, they are in reality increasing World Poverty and World Hunger, that is in effect they are working against increasing Development Impact and development Effectiveness Worldwide.

C. Political Leaders – International and National Media
We call on Political Leaders, Heads of Institutions, Senior Administrators and Senior Technocrats of International and National Media to recognize that as long as they fail to articulate, implement and monitor, evaluate and assess New Media Agenda, they would be unable to influence necessary Transformations within National Development Cooperation and International Development Cooperation, thus hurting their own Journalists colleagues as well as citizens of both Developed and Developing Countries.


D. Political Leaders – Global, Regional and National Professional Bodies
We call on Boards, Institution Members and Individual Members of Research, Planning, Statistics, Implementation, Monitoring, Evaluation and Assessment Professional Bodies to recognize that as long as they fail to build adequate levels of knowledge, competencies, capacity, networking, they would be unable to influence necessary Transformations within National Development Cooperation and International Development Cooperation, thus hurting their own Members as well as citizens of both Developed and Developing Countries.

E. Opinion Leaders – Developed Countries
We call on Developed Countries Citizens, particularly the Opinion Leaders in Business Community and the Larger Civil Society to recognize that as long as they fail to Demand adequate levels of Transformations within National Development Cooperation and International Development Cooperation from their own Governments, they are in reality increasing the impact and duration of triple whammy – high inflation, high unemployment and low growth in their own countries; that is in reality hurting themselves and people they love.

F. Opinion Leaders – Developing Countries
We call on Developing Countries Citizens, particularly the Opinion Leaders in Business Community and the Larger Civil Society to recognize that as long as they fail to Demand adequate levels of Transformations within National Development Cooperation and International Development Cooperation from their own Governments, they are in reality increasing the impact of Globalization as Force for Evil; that is in reality hurting themselves and people they love.



Appendix

If you want to participate in the implementation of ideas and suggestions generated from discussions on this Platform, we invite you to join Multidisciplinary Professionals Community of Practice on Poverty Elimination and Environmental Sustainability, MPCOP-PE&ES and Comprehensive Systemic Reform, CSR Project. Please send 3PCM and CSR Project enquiry to ispeabuja@yahoo.co.uk

List of Topics for Next 10 Weeks.
New Topic Posted Every Monday

1.    MDGs’ at 10: How to Achieve Sustainable Success in the Implementation of Outcome 2010 UN MDGs’ Summit? 8 November 2010 Ref 2/2010
2.    Reinforcing and Reinvigorating Implementation of G20 Summit Declarations  15 November 2010 Ref 3/2010
3.    Rethinking, Redesigning, Rebuilding Country / International Institutions Advocacy Systems 22 November 2010 Ref 4/2010
4.    Transforming Policy, Program, Project Failure into Success 29 November 2010 Ref 5/2010
5.    One Worldwide Competencies Framework for All 6 December 2010 Ref 6/2010
6.    Reforms for Achieving National Visions and Global Visions 13 December 2010 Ref 7/2010
7.    Human Rights and Governance 20 December 2010 Ref 8/2010
8.    Religion and World Sustainable Development 27 December 2010 Ref 9/2010
9.    New Year; New Hope 3 January 2011 Ref 10/2010
10.                       Elections, Economic Growth and Pro Poor Institutional Reforms 10 January 2011 Ref 1/2011

Together we can help make our World a
Better Place
to Live, Work and Recreate for Citizens and Immigrants in all Countries Rich and Poor.