Introduction
The
Synthesis Report on Post 2015 Development Agenda was released by UN Secretary
General on 4 December 2014. We commend all who have contributed towards the
production of this important Report. The Report essentially addressed World
Sustainable Development What and Why questions, but did not address How
questions.
We are
concerned that fundamental issues raised in our Initial Comments 1,2 and 3 are
ignored, yet the Synthesis Report Paragraph 22 and other Paragraphs identified
in our Initial Comments Commits the UN and Partners to Business Unusual, New
Ideas, New Thinking, New Ways of Doing Things, New Rules etc. In ignoring these
comments, is the UN "Walking its Talk"?
We observe
that ongoing World Sustainable Development Dialogue continue to proceed along
Pre Synthesis Report lines instead of Post Synthesis Report lines; that
comments are welcome on the Synthesis Report; that current Synthesis Report is
described as Final Draft and that the Final Draft was published in 6 UN
Official languages on 31 December 2014, as earlier promised. This is
commendable.
We observe further
that the Official Copy of the Data Revolution Report was a Printers Copy very
much different from the Final Draft but the Official Copy of the Synthesis
Report is essentially an official Gazette. The bad news is that an Official
Copy of the Synthesis Report has been released while Global comments on same
are still being taken (in ways that seem uncoordinated and inadequate). The
Good News is that Global Consultation can proceed in 6 UN Languages so that
comments obtained in each of the 6 languages could be integrated into a Second
Version Official Copy Synthesis Report that is again published in 6 UN
languages.
It is a
puzzle that our comments have been blocked from inclusion on the official
platform for taking comments on Final Draft / Official Copy Synthesis Report
because we are the only contributor that does not have a website and this
requirement could not be relaxed from compulsory to optional for just one
contributor who is unable to meet this requirement. Again is this consistent
with the Business Unusual Principle that the Synthesis Report seeks to
operationalize in practice?
The
Synthesis Report is essentially a Score Card of the Final Push to achieve MDGs’
by 2015 and Post 2015 Development Agenda. Its intention should be to summarize
what has been achieved and set out what remains to be done, and most
importantly HOW it is to be done, if
there is to be increasing convergence between Final Push to achieve MDGs’ by
2015 and Post 2015 Development Agenda Vision, Goals and Targets: Intention and
Reality. The overarching aim of this initial Comment 4 is to build on Initial
Comment 1, 2 and 3 to help achieve this Synthesis Report Intention.
Big Issue –
Tackling Greatest Limitations
In the work towards achieving increasing
convergence between Final Push to achieve MDGs by 2015 and Post 2015
Development Agenda Vision Intention and Reality the Greatest Limitations we
have identified lie in how well shortcomings, drawbacks and hindrances in each
specific Community (Village to Global Geopolitical Space / Constituency) are
Professionally identified and tackled, in ways that are effective, efficient
and deliver sustainable benefits to Target Beneficiaries. To achieve this,
there is urgent need for ongoing Sub-national, National, Sub-regional, Regional
and Global Dialogue to face new direction and adopt new priorities Driven by:-
1. Shifting
away from Qualified and Conditional Business Unusual Interventions and Shifting
towards Unqualified and Unconditional Business Unusual Interventions.
2. Shifting
away from addressing fundamental issues within Shadow Rhetoric and Empty Ritual
and Shifting towards addressing fundamental issues within Stark Reality and
Strategic Partnerships
3. Shift
away from Ideas and Models Political Leadership / Public Service Leadership in
International Institutions / Governments – Developed and /or Developing is /
are interested in and Shift towards Ideas and Models that are in the Interest
of Private Enterprise / Civil Society / Countries – Developed and /or
Developing.
4. Shift
away from Policy, Program, Project Interventions, 3PIs that are Non People
Centred and Anti Poor and Shift towards Policy, Program, Project Interventions,
3PIs that are People Centred and Pro Poor.
5. Shift
away from Non Identification, Non Empowerment, Non Promotion and Non Protection
of Individuals, Institutions and Governments that can support Village to Global
Stakeholders Collective Action for achieving increasing convergence between MDG
/ SDG (MDG 2) Vision Intention and Reality wherever they could be found in our
World today and Shift towards Identification, Empowerment, Promotion and
Protection of Individuals, Institutions and Governments that can support
Village to Global Stakeholders Collective Action for achieving increasing
convergence between MDG / SDG (MDG 2) Vision Intention and Reality wherever
they could be found in our World today
Understanding the Nature of World Poverty
Our Study finding is that most of the
Professionals currently engaged in Fighting World Poverty on: Go To Think
Tanks, Governments, International Institutions, Civil Society, Private Sector,
Academics and Development Consultants sides and this explains why in the first
50 years of International Development Cooperation 1960 – 2009; the un-encouraging
Scorecard is:-
1/3 Good Evaluation; 1/3 Flawed Evaluation;
1/3 Failed Evaluation
1/3 Good Policy/Program/Project; 1/3 Flawed
Policy/Program/Project; 1/3 Failed Policy/Program/Project
Lessons have not been learnt from Lessons
Learnt in the first 50 years and so Lessons Learning has been progressing at
the same rate as Lessons Forgetting. The result is as we enter the 6th
year in the second 50 years of International Development Cooperation, the
Scorecard is still the same – un-encouraging. As long as relevant International
Development Cooperation authorities refuse to learn from the lessons of
history, World Leaders will continue to repeat the mistakes of history. The
difference this time, is that given worsening World Terrorism, Insurgency,
Hunger and Poverty etc the ultimate consequences of these reoccurring flaws and
failures could be catastrophic for Citizens in both Developed and Developing
Countries in our World today, particularly the over 2 Billion poor, including
increasing number of Women, Youth and Children in US, UK, France and other
Developed Countries that the UN, World Bank Group, IMF, EC etc claim to serve.
If Village to Global Stakeholders in
International Development Cooperation are to have a better understanding of World
Poverty, that is understand Why Terrorism, Insurgency, Hunger and Poverty etc
as One is Fighting the World as basis for understanding How to Fight World Terrorism,
Insurgency, Hunger and Poverty etc as One, then World Leaders need to
Individually and Jointly Recognize that the following Principles are some of
the Master Keys to Sustainable Success:-
1. To Fight and Win on Successful and Sustainable
basis the War on World Terrorism, Insurgency, Hunger and Poverty etc as One,
there is urgent need for all
Stakeholders in each specific Community (specific Village to Global
Geopolitical Space or Constituency) to fully understand and effectively deploy,
the Forces that generate Individual, Institution, Enterprise and Country
Prosperity.
2. Your Enemy is Your Friend
3. Learning all there is to learn from both
positive / constructive and negative / destructive criticism.
4.
Operationalizing
in Practice the 4 Shifts set out in Comment 2.
Reforming the UN Family
The UN Charter established 6 Principal Organs
of the UN – the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social
Council, the Trusteeship Council, the International Court of Justice and the
Secretariat. The UN Family is much larger, encompassing 15 Agencies and several
Programs and Bodies. 2015 is the UN 70th Anniversary year and a good
time for a frank and truthful review of the UN Family, if it is to be an
International Institution fit for the 21st Century.
It will be recalled that the UN was
established 70 years ago to be the effective Platform for Global Collective
Action for Political Stability of our World and the IMF (a member of the UN
family) was established 70 years ago to be the effective Platform for Global
Collective Action for Economic Stability. The Roles of World Bank Group and IMF
in the deployment of Global Collective Action for Economic Stability is blurred
and there is too much overlapping responsibility and uncoordinated jurisdiction
among several UN Family Members, for example IMF, WBG, UNDP and so the World
Poor - over 2 Billion are not getting the best from the specialist capabilities
and huge knowledge available in each UN Family Member. This underlines urgent
need for the review highlighted above.
While contentious areas in the Reform of UN
Family Members individually and collectively can wait, non contentious areas of
Reform cannot wait, if there is to be increasing convergence between Final Push
to achieve MDG by 2015 and Post 2015 Development Agenda Vision Intention and
Reality. This is because there is increasing evidence that some UN Family
Members, particularly IMF and WBG are in reality increasing Poverty (IMF is far
Worse than WBG), that is, they are delivering Services contrary to their
Mission, Vision and Mandate. This evidence will continue to be ignored for as
long as World Leaders are in Denial, Delusion or Deception. Should World
Leaders continue to delay or deny Ordered Change in Reforming UN Family
starting from non contentious areas, they knowingly or unknowingly make
Disordered Change inevitable. Allowed to occur the ultimate consequences will
be catastrophic. The following are suggestions on non contentious areas of
Reform that select UN Family Members could embark upon immediately. Success
achieved will shed light on practical options for tackling contentious areas of
Reform in each UN Family Member.
IMF
1. Convert Fund to World Central Bank
2. Remove Operational Secrecy by establishing
visible presence (same as WBG) in each of the 193 UN Member Countries
3. Re-establish Independent Evaluation Group,
IMF-IEG with specific Unit for Specific Institution within the New IMF (World
Central Bank) and using the same Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management
System to correctly identify Good Evaluation; Flawed Evaluation and Failed
Evaluation and Defend IMF Self Correction System.
4. Re-establish Reward and Sanction System to
Adequately Reward Good Evaluation; Good Policy; Good Program; Good Project and
Effectively Sanction Flawed / Failed Evaluation; Flawed / Failed Policy; Flawed
/ Failed Program; Flawed / Failed Project based on Short Term Reviews: 1year,
2years, 3years; Medium Term Reviews: 5years, 7years, 10years and Long Term Reviews:
15years, 20years, 25years.
WBG
1. Re-establish Institutions – Private Finance
Corporation; Public Finance Corporation; Grant Finance Corporation; Investment
Guarantee Agency; Dispute Resolution Agency.
2. Re-establish Independent Evaluation Group,
WBG-IEG with specific Unit for each of the 5 WBG Institutions and using the
same Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management System to correctly identify
Good Evaluation; Flawed Evaluation and Failed Evaluation and Defend WBG Self
Correction System.
3. Re-establish Reward and Sanction System to
Adequately Reward Good Evaluation; Good Policy; Good Program; Good Project and
Effectively Sanction Flawed / Failed Evaluation; Flawed / Failed Policy; Flawed
/ Failed Program; Flawed / Failed Project based on Short Term Reviews: 1year,
2years, 3years; Medium Term Reviews: 5years, 7years, 10years and Long Term
Reviews: 15years, 20years, 25years.
UN
1. Re-establish Secretariat, Bodies, Programs,
Funds, Institutes and Entities and saddle each with specific responsibility for
specific Primary Revolution(s) – Data Revolution, Agriculture Revolution;
Enterprise Revolution; Government Revolution; Applied Research Revolution;
Attitudinal and Behavioral Change Revolution etc and or Secondary Revolution(s)
– Nutrition Revolution’ Health Revolution; Education Revolution, Risk
Management Revolution; Diplomacy Revolution; Geodesign Revolution; Financial
Inclusion Revolution etc
2. Re-establish Independent Evaluation Group, UN-IEG
with specific Unit for specific UN Agency – Secretariat, Body, Program, Fund,
Institute, Entity and using the same Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management
System to correctly identify Good Evaluation; Flawed Evaluation and Failed
Evaluation and Defend UN Self Correction System.
3. Re-establish Reward and Sanction System to
Adequately Reward Good Evaluation; Good Policy; Good Program; Good Project and
Effectively Sanction Flawed / Failed Evaluation; Flawed / Failed Policy; Flawed
/ Failed Program; Flawed / Failed Project based on Short Term Reviews: 1year,
2years, 3years; Medium Term Reviews: 5years, 7years, 10years and Long Term
Reviews: 15years, 20years, 25years.
Once each UN Family Executive Management
Member, Senior Official or Junior Officer know that his / her decisions today
will be subject to Short, Medium and Long Term Review with Joy of Reward and
Pain of Sanction that could be enjoyed or suffered even when they are over 80
years old if alive or that will be enjoyed or suffered by their descendants if
dead, People will be more careful in taking callous decisions with impunity,
that is so rampant not only on UN Family Members side but also on Developed
Countries, Developing Countries, other International Institutions sides today.
Global Consultation on Financing for Development Conference – Addis
Ababa July 2015
The current consultation is focused on
Conference Format. Four Options have been given for format of Mach 2015
Stakeholder Hearings at UN Headquarters. It appears this specific activity
could be chasing shadow, ultimately resulting in consultation for consultation sake.
This is because should the most popular Conference Format option be adopted,
this may not be the most technically correct option. While it is important to
hear the Voices of respondents, in this specific case, it is more important to
give greater weight to the Voice of knowledgeable Development Consultants with
expertise, experience and exposure to support relevant authorities and
participants to design and deliver a Conference that will “Work”, that is
deliver Sustainable Benefits to Target Beneficiaries.
If the UN does not know why past important
conferences such as FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty 1995 etc failed or why
important Reports such as MDG Gap Report 2013 and 2014 have no impact on work
towards achieving increasing convergence between Final Push to achieve MDG by
2015 and Post 2015 Development Agenda Vision Intention and Reality, the UN will
not know how to organize an Addis Ababa Conference that will succeed on
sustainable basis where past similar Conferences – Monterrey Conference; Doha
Conference and Crisis Conference had failed. We wait to see how this feat of a
Conference that Works, could be achieve if the Preparatory Process for the
Addis Ababa Conference does not adopt New Priorities and face New Directions
underlined by addressing fundamental issues raised in Comments 1,2,3 and 4.
Global Consultation on Synthesis Report
It is pertinent to note that the relevant
authorities are running behind schedule articulated in the Roadmap to Addis
Ababa Conference as well as Roadmap to the 70th General Assembly,
September 2015. Now that the Synthesis Report has been released in 6 UN
Official languages, there is urgent need to integrate Finance and Non Finance
issues; Human Resources Development, HRD and Non HRD issues; Technical and Non
Technical issues; Political and Non Political issues as One into a Revised
Official Copy of Synthesis Report (Version 2) in 6 UN Official languages for
release by UN Secretary General on 31 January 2015.
The UN Secretary General could direct the 5 UN
Regional Commissions to coordinate the participation of UN Secretariat, Bodies,
Programs, Funds, Institutes, Entities in their respective Regional Groups and
their Partners to comment on the Synthesis Report within 2 weeks and make their
submissions by 19 January 2015. The submissions will be made in the UN Official
language(s) spoken by the UN Member Countries in the Region and translated into
English to produce a Final Draft in English that will be translated into
Official Synthesis Report Version 2 in 6 UN Official languages Gazette that
would be released by UN Secretary General on 31 January 2015. There is a need
to produce a more detailed Global Report that is a Summary of the earlier and
current Global Consultation. This Global Report also needs to be made available
in 6 UN Official languages and as soon as possible after 31 January 2015.
Common
Definition
The increasing poverty levels in Nigeria, Africa,
UK, Europe, US and World is a Scar on the Conscience of Researchers in Top
Universities across the World, particularly in G8 Countries. To remove this
Scar, Researchers in these Universities need to shift focus away from academic
research aimed at advancing the frontiers of knowledge to academic research
aimed at institutionalizing true development. To achieve this, there is a need
for all relevant Stakeholders to have common agreement on the definition of
Advocacy, True Development, Development Research, Goals, Targets and
Indicators.
We
suggest: Advocacy is the set of
strategies and activities designed and delivered to influence: specific
government, particularly the executive and legislative arms, in a specific
country (for example Local Government, State Government or National Government
in Nigeria) or specific Political Grouping of Countries, including the
legislative arm where it exists, in a specific Sub-region e.g. ECOWAS; Region /
Continent e.g. Africa Union; Global / World e.g. G20, to take particular
decision, fully implement the decision and effectively monitor and evaluate the
implementation to ensure increasing convergence between decision intention and
reality.
Advocacy
is the set of strategies and activities designed and delivered to influence:
specific individual, institution or society to move from an undesired state to
a desired state and to remain in this desired state. Should realities on the
ground demand that the desired state be changed to a more desired state, this
will be done on continuing basis.
True
Development must mean the development of man –
the unfolding and realization of his creative potential enabling him to improve
his material conditions and living through the use of resources available to
him. It is a process by which man’s personality is enhanced and it is that
enhanced personality – creative, organized and disciplined which is the MOVING FORCE behind the socio economic
TRANSFORMATION of Society. It is clear that development does not start with
goods and things, it starts with people, their orientation, organization and
discipline. When the accent on development is on things, all human resources
remain latent, untapped potential and a Society can be poor amidst the most
opulent of material resources. On the contrary, where a Society is properly
oriented, organized and disciplined, it can be prosperous on the scantiest basis
of natural wealth.
For
Development to qualify as True Development,
it must be all round, well balanced, progressive and self sustaining: all
individual aspects must be mutually reinforcing. True Development has to be
multi sectoral, multi disciplinary and multi dimensional. True Development is
much more than provision of road, electricity, water, communication facilities,
education and health facilities among others; however important all these may
be. True Development must include the exploitation of all available resources
for the maximum good, vast improvement in a peoples’ self reliance and self
reassurance in their creative and managerial ability, in their productivity and
production, particularly of the goods and services needed by the majority to improve
the quality of their lives; vast and rapid qualitative and quantitative
improvement in their individual and collective security and welfare and in
their socio cultural and socio political development in the installation of a
more democratic, egalitarian, civil and civilized society amongst others.
True
Development must embrace every aspect of a
peoples’ life – political, economic, social. The reason is that these are
interconnected and interdependent. An Individual cannot want to move forward
economically without first of all having the political base for moving forward
economically. An Individual cannot want to move forward socially without having
the political and economic base to move forward socially. So if the relevant
authorities – national and international, pay attention to one while leaving
the other, these authorities will be deceiving themselves while increasing the
avoidable pain and misery of these Individuals, with ultimate catastrophic
consequences for Citizens in both Rich and Poor Countries in our World today.
Nigeria,
US and World Sustainable Development
There are
predictions that Nigeria could disintegrate in 2015. Events as Nigeria race to
2015 General Elections suggest that this prophesy could become reality or
Nigeria could fumble and wobble to avoid catastrophe. The World cannot afford
the cost of a disintegrated Nigeria. If the World helps Nigeria to permanently
avoid disintegration the World will in reality be helping itself. This is
because Nigeria is the Biggest Single Black Nation on earth. If this anarchy is
not tackled in Nigeria National Interest and World Interest, the legal and
illegal Migration of Asylum Seekers and Displaced Persons will overwhelm
Countries in West Africa, other Africa Regions, UK, other European Countries,
US and other Countries across the World why these Nigerians flee to.
Also, the US
is the Only Superpower in our World today. The US is in decline. The US has
huge National Debts that it is unwilling to tackle (unlike the UK that is
taking steps to tackle its financial problems). The Killing of US Police
Officers by US Citizens opens up fundamental issues of racism, impunity,
injustice, indifference, corruption and crime etc that US Leaders pretend does
not exist. If this anarchy is not tackled in US National Interest and World
interest, the Collapse of the US Economy will trigger Collapse of the World
Economy.
The US
Government now know that US National Security greatly depends on Development,
Diplomacy and Defense; that Military Solution alone cannot tame World Terrorism
and Insurgency; that Reconciliation Solutions are required to address World
Terrorism and Insurgency. But they need to know that Charity must start from
Home and the World need to know that in helping the US and Nigeria, they are in
reality helping themselves.
It is clear
that crime and corruption in Nigeria is child’s play compared to crime and
corruption in New York alone, not to talk of other States in the US, yet
Nigeria ranks high on Transparency International’s list of Corrupt Countries
(Bribe Takers) and US rank low; that after US$25 Billion and countless US and
Non US including Afghanistan lives, Afghanistan today poses great threat to
itself and the World; that Terrorism and Insurgency situation in Iraq, Syria
etc defy US Solutions; that Boko Haram defy Nigeria Solutions and that without
Fighting and Winning 4 Wars from Village to Global
levels: War on Poverty, Hunger, Disease and Environmental Degradation (PHDE),
real and complex Political & Cultural; Economic & Financial; Social
& Environmental; Peace & Security; Religious and Moral problems on the
ground facing Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and rest of the World cannot be
solved. It is pertinent to note that in each war there is a need to Fight and
WIN 12 Battles: Battle Against Arrogance, Ignorance, Indifference,
Incompetence, Indiscipline, Injustice, Intolerance, Insincerity, Inequality,
Interference, Impunity and Corruption (A10IC).
A Situation where US Leaders fail to tackle Root
Problems responsible for US Police Killings; where US, Canada and Europe
Leaders prefer to subsidize Cows - Animals at over US$2 per day while Poor
Africans – Human Beings live on less than US$1 per day; where many Poor People
in Developing Countries die of starvation while many dustbins in Developed
Countries have too much waste food; where US, Canada and Europe subsidy on
Agricultural Production and Export worsen Pain and Misery of Poor African
Farmers who produce food but cannot feed their families; where the contribution
of Cows produced in Developed Countries is more than the contribution of Cars
to Climate Change problems - Call for World Leaders Urgent Action towards the
Evolution of New World Order: Political & Cultural; Economic &
Financial; Social & Environmental; Peace & Security; Religious and
Moral.
It is pertinent to note that today, all Systems –
Foreign Aid, Governance, Security etc in the US and Nigeria are in state of
decay. Any attempt to overhaul these Systems that is not integral part of
correctly identifying all Root Problems and providing correct solutions to same
will be exercise in futility. It is by helping Nigeria and Africa; UK and
Europe; US and rest of the World to achieve this New World Order that lasting
solutions could be found to Terrorism, Insurgency, Hunger, Poverty and other
World problems in over 200 UN Member Countries and Non UN Member Countries in
our World today.
World Leaders need to recognize that to delay or
deny Ordered Change through Reforms that help create New International Systems
fit for the 21st Century driving the evolution of this New World
Order, is to make Disordered Change inevitable, with ultimate catastrophic
consequences for Citizens in both Developed and Developing Countries in our
World today. We have before us Road to Boom and Road to Doom. World Leaders
have to make a Choice. No Choice is a Choice.
Major
Groups
There is a Major Group for Civil Society – NGO Major
Group; there is a Major Group for Business Sector – Business and Industry Major
Group with International Chamber of Commerce as Main Organization. However,
there is no Development Consultant Major Group. Yet the expertise experience and
exposure of Development Consultants is required if real and complex problems on
the ground facing Civil Society, Business Sector, Government, other
Stakeholders including Target Beneficiaries are to be professionally tackled on
successful and sustainable basis.
However, Development Consultants that could best
perform in this role are those with minimum certain levels of Hard Competences
– Learning and Skills and Soft Competences – Character, Courage and Mindset and
who are willing to work under blended Commercial and Not for Profit
arrangement.
To fill this Gap, there is urgent need to create
Development Consultant Major Group with Network of Consultants in Sustainable
Development, NCSD as Main Organization. Should this suggestion be accepted, we
are willing to provide more details about NCSD.
Just as UN NGO Liaison Service has been created to
coordinate UN engagement with Civil Society, should the idea of creating
Development Consultant Major Group be welcome, there will be need to create UN
Development Consultant Liaison Service to coordinate UN engagement with
Development Consultants.
One
Worldwide Approach
The Official Copy of the Synthesis Report identify
need for One Worldwide Approach to be adopted by all relevant Village to Global
Stakeholders in each specific Community (specific Village to Global
Geopolitical Space / Constituency) in our World today. The most advance such
Approach available anywhere in our World today is 3PCM (Policy, Program,
Project Cycle Management Approach to Benefits focused National and
International Development Cooperation).
In the work towards deploying Synthesis Report ideas
and recommendations, as enriched by ongoing Global Consultation (hopefully in 6
UN languages) to provide Official Copy Synthesis Report Version 2 (that we
suggest is produced in 6 UN Official languages and released by UN Secretary
General on 31 January 2015) to implement Final Push to achieve MDG by 2015 and
Post 2015 Development Agenda, there is urgent need for World Leaders to
correctly identify this One Worldwide Approach with clear Principles,
Instruments corresponding to each Principle, Practices and Database as well as
ways and means of Training all relevant Village to Global Stakeholders to
understand How to Use the Approach in their Day to Day work. Should World
Leaders reject 3PCM Option as the most Viable One Worldwide Approach, we
respect their Right to make such Choice. It is our hope that the Alternative
Option of One Worldwide Approach they chose will be Viable and will achieve
better results than 3PCM has demonstrated capacity to achieve.
Conclusion
Should these
thoughts be welcome and acted upon, we are encouraged to work on the Draft
Synthesis Report as well as the Global Report within the timelines for release
of Final Global Report and Final Synthesis Report in 6 official UN languages by
31 December 2014 or 7 January 2015. We expect that enough individuals will also
make required sacrifice to help achieve the deadlines.
God Bless UN. God
Bless our World.
If you require some clarification or additional
information, please send email to:-
Lanre
Rotimi
International
Society for Poverty Elimination, ISPE /
Economic
Alliance Group
