EAG ISPE
ECONOMIC ALLIANCE GROUP INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR POVERTY ELIMINATION
(Global
Integrated Innovative Sustainable Solutions Provider) (Global Social Development Innovation
Organization)
ER&A NEHMAP Initiative
ER and Associates Limited New End Hunger, Malnutrition
and Poverty Initiative
(International Development
Cooperation Consultants) (Global Social Economy and Social
Enterprise Organization)
Achieving Delivery on
SDGs Pledge in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context, in
barely 11 years remaining to end 2030 target date – Urgent Need for UN System:
UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO (ITO) to Face New Direction and Adopt New Priorities (4).
EAG Thoughts on Priorities and Direction in the Implementation and
Evaluation of Food, Nutrition, Agriculture and Security Vision Dimension Linked
to Political, Cultural, Economic, Financial, Social, Security, Peace,
Religious, Climate Change, Environmental, Procurement and Governance etc
Dimensions of Transformation Agenda –
AAAA, SDG, COP21, Agenda 21 and NIEO for Delivery on SDG Pledge (No Goal will
be considered met if it is not met by All Peoples in All Countries) by 2030 Target date.
Introduction
As 3rd Quarter 2019 Year 4 of Implementation of SDGs end,
and all 193/306 UN Member States are still Off Track achieving delivery on SDGs
Pledge by 2030, we again urge World Leaders to recognize that there is an urgent need for them to pause and do
critical review of successes, flaws and failures in past 15 of 60 Quarters of
SDGs Implementation, as basis for Rethinking
SDGs Pledge (which states that No
Goal will be considered met if it is not achieved by all Peoples in all
Countries) for effective delivery
Worldwide, in the barely 11 years
remaining to end 2030 target date.
The fact that all 193/306 UN Member States are Off Track achieving
delivery on SDGs Pledge by 2030 demand minimum certain levels of National and
International Development Cooperation Radial/Fundamental and Rapid Change. This
paints an inclusive education and inclusive communications landscape that is
quite different from what we were familiar with. This points to new directions
for needed changes and expose significant inadequacies in the framework of
analysis that was employed in the past and are still being employed in the
present. This underlines urgent need to fill information, research, knowledge
and ambition gaps as applicable or appropriate in each specific Community,
Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent and Global location context, if
all 193/306 UN Member States are to get back On Track to achieve delivery on
SDGs Pledge in barely 11 years remaining to end 2030 target date.
In this Paper, we again appeal to the conscience of National
and World Leaders to know that choices
they make – what they do and what they do not do, will determine if SDGs Pledge is achieved
Worldwide or not; that should all Communities, Countries and Continents in our
World today, fail to achieve
delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge by end 2030 target date, the Ultimate Consequences will be Catastrophic for all Citizens,
especially the over 5 billion Poor in all North and South Countries in our
World of 2030 and that there are Bright Prospects
of success should National and World Leaders do the needful and without further delay.
Study Findings
Our Study Finding is that:-
1. There are 2 sides to Culture and Values in all Countries
(193/306 UN Member States and these are:-
a) Attitude, Behavior and Communication
b) Rights, Development and
Governance
2. There are 3 Generations of Universal Human Rights.
These are:-
a) 1st
Generation: Civil and Political Rights
b) 2nd Generation:
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
c) 3rd Generation: Collective,
Freedoms and Solidarity Rights
3. The 1st, 2nd and 3rd Generations of
Universal Human Rights need to be Implemented and Evaluated as One in each
of the 193/306 UN Member States and as applicable or appropriate in each
specific Community, Sub-Country, Sub-Continent and Continent location context.
4. Realities
of No
Government in Northern Ireland for years as well as UK/EU Brexit as National/Sub-Region Crises and Mess –
Political, Economic, Social dismiss Myth
that High Income Countries are in 3rd Generation Universal Human
Rights; Middle Income Countries are in 2nd Generation Universal
Human Rights and Low Income Countries are still grappling with 1st
Generation Universal Human Rights.
5. All Countries in our World today, have Bad Cultures and Bad Values
hindering Work towards achieving Delivery on SDGs Pledge by 2030 as well as
Good Cultures and Good Values helping Work towards achieving Delivery on SDGs
Pledge by 2030. The Challenge is to
reduce its own Bad Cultures and Bad Values while preventing other Countries Bad
Cultures and Bad Values drawing it back from achieving Delivery on SDGs Pledge
by 2030 while simultaneously improving on its Good Cultures and Good Values and
adapting other Countries Good Cultures and Good Values to increase its
acceleration towards getting done the much that remain to be done, if it is to
achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in all its Communities by 2030 target date.
6. As
long as Right Answers to National
and international Development Cooperation Radical/Fundamental and Rapid/Fast Change
HOW Questions are not speedily
found; Solving SDGs in all 193/306 UN Member
States and 193/306 UN Member States Sustainability Strategy HOW
Questions; Humans as X Factor How
Questions; Changing Attitude and
Behavior of Leaders and Followers at Scale in all 193/306 UN Member States
Leaders and Followers HOW Questions and related HOW Questions would be especially difficult if not impossible.
As long as these Linked answers are
not found, fully implemented with effective monitoring and evaluation of this
implementation, and on time, the probability of finding permanent solutions to all
193/306 UN Member States New
National Development Vision and New International Development Vision as One
Huge and Complex problems on the ground is Low. If these permanent solutions
are not found and on time, the ultimate
consequences shall be catastrophic for all National and International
Stakeholders in World
Economy.
7. Meaningfully addressing (1 -
6) underline urgent need to
Operationalize in Practice Millennium Declaration (see below) and in ways
that are Interrelated, Interdependent,
Interlinked and Interconnected with Delivery on SDGs 5Ps – Peace, Prosperity, People, Partnership and Planet and 2 SDGs Principles set out by UNSG Ban Ki
Moon that were omitted in SDGs Agreed by World Leaders – Dignity and Justice, that is SDGs 5Ps and DJ as well as SDGs 2
Concepts – Work Together to Benefit Together and Leave No One Behind as
applicable or appropriate in each specific Community, Sub-Country, Sub-Continent
,Continent and Global location context.
8. Ministry
of Justice in
All 193/306 UN Member States have Central
Role to Play in the Dignity and
Justice Dimension as well and the Universal
Human Rights Dimension of the SDGs in all 193/306 UN Member States.
Multi Stakeholder Platforms, MSP for Results SDGs Pledge Delivery by
2030
To effectively address
all fundamental issues highlighted in the Study Findings, DEMAND:-
1. Sustainable
Development Solutions Network, SDSN: There is urgent need for backbone SDSN that is essentially
for Academics and Theoreticians.
2. Development
Cooperation Solutions Platform, DCSN: There is urgent need for backbone SDSN that is essentially
for Academics and Theoreticians.
3. Sustainable
Development Solutions Platform, SDSP: There is urgent need for backbone SDSP that is essentially
for Professionals and Practitioners
– State Actors and Non State Actors, Informal Sector and Formal Sector,
National and International in all 193/306 UN Member States.
4. Development
Cooperation Solutions Platform, DCSP: There is urgent need for backbone SDSN that is essentially
for Professionals and Practitioners
– State Actors and Non State Actors, Informal Sector and Formal Sector,
National and International in all 193/306 UN Member States.
Each of the 4 MSP will have National and International
Architecture that effectively connect all Communities in all 193/306 UN Member
States to UN System: UNO Headquarters New York and Headquarters of UNO Entities
outside New York; WBG Headquarters Washington; IMF, Headquarters Washington and
WTO Headquarters. EAG Innovation essentially converts 17 Goals of the SDGs into 2 Goals – Ending World Hunger,
Malnutrition and Poverty and Managing Climate Change and Achieving
Environmental Sustainability in All North and South Countries.
Each of the 4 MSP will help in the Implementation and
Evaluation of National and Global Integrated Innovative Sustainable Solutions
set out 3PCM, One Worldwide Approach to
National and International Development Cooperation Radical/Fundamental and
Rapid/Fast Change at levels required to achieve Delivery on SDGs Pledge in
all 193/306 UN Member States in barely 11 years remaining to end 2030 target
date; HOW Master Plans for
Implementation and Evaluation of SDGs in Country and Country Sustainability
Strategy that is sufficiently All Inclusive, All Embracing and Ambitious to
achieve SDGs Pledge Delivery in all 193/306 UN Member States in barely 11 years
remaining to end 2030 target date – involving Making 4th Agriculture
Revolution Work for World Poor, Making 4th Industrial Revolution
Work for World Poor, Making Globalization Work for World Poor and Making
Governance Work for World Poor and remaining 3 Pillars and also set our Procedure – Goals Framework – WHAT
National and International Stakeholders want to achieve; Means Framework – Resources – Capital – Fund, Human, Physical,
Network at levels adequate to achieve the Goals and Effectiveness Framework: HOW to effectively deploy the Resources
into Research, Planning, Data, Implementation, Monitoring, Evaluation,
Learning, Transparency, Accountability, Participation, Results, Success
Measures at levels adequate to achieve the Goals in each of the 193/306 UN
Member States and by end 2030 target date.
Values
underlying The Millennium Declaration (MDGs 8 Goals, are still Valid for achieving Delivery on SDGs 17 Goals
in all 193/306 UN Member States by 2030)
The
Millennium Declaration—which outlines sixty goals for peace;
development; the environment; human rights; the vulnerable, hungry, and poor;
Africa; and the United Nations—is founded on a core set of values:
“We consider certain fundamental values to be essential to
international relations in the twenty-first century. These include:
Freedom. Men and women have the right
to live their lives and raise their children in dignity, free from hunger and
from the fear of violence, oppression, or injustice. Democratic and
participatory governance based on the will of the people best assures these
rights.
Equality. No individual and no nation
must be denied the opportunity to benefit from development. The equal rights
and opportunities of women and men must be assured.
Solidarity. Global challenges must be
managed in a way that distributes the costs and burdens fairly in accordance
with basic principles of equity and social justice. Those who suffer or who
benefit least deserve help from those who benefit most.
Tolerance. Human beings must respect one
other, in all their diversity of belief, culture, and language. Differences
within and between societies should be neither feared nor repressed, but
cherished as a precious asset of humanity. A culture of peace and dialogue
among all civilizations should be actively promoted.
Respect for Nature.
Prudence must be shown in the management of all living species and natural
resources, in accordance with the precepts of sustainable development. Only in
this way can the immeasurable riches provided to us by nature be preserved and
passed on to our descendants. The current unsustainable patterns of production
and consumption must be changed in the interest of our future welfare and that of
our descendants.
Shared Responsibility.
Responsibility for managing worldwide economic and social development, as well
as threats to international peace and security, must be shared among the
nations of the world and should be exercised multilaterally. As the most
universal and most representative organization in the world, the United Nations must play the
central role.”
United
Nations Dept. of Public Information, 2000.
As long as Task to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge is not
firmly grounded in operationalizing The Millennium Declaration Value
Orientation Dimension of SDGs, seeking to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in
barely 11 years remaining to end 2030 target date is Mirage.
The Big Challenge
The SDGs has set out All Inclusive,
All Embracing and Ambitious 2030
World Transformation Agenda without complimentary All Inclusive, all
Embracing and Ambitious World Implementation and Evaluation Framework. This
explain why as at end 3rd Quarter 2019 Year 4 of Implementation All
North and South Countries are still Off Track achieving Delivery on SDGs Pledge
in barely 11 years remaining to end 2030 target date.
All North and South Countries could
be Categorized into 3:-
1. Achieved
Some of the Goals of the SDGs; On Track to achieve Some of the Goals of the
SDGs and Off Track achieving remaining Goals of the SDGs.
2. On
Track to achieve Some of the Goals of the SDGs and Off Track achieving
remaining Goals of the SDGs.
3. Off
Track achieving all the 17 Goals of the SDGs.
The Work Together to Benefit
Together Concept of the SDGs means that there must be a Whole of World as One
Society Approach towards achieving Delivery on the SDGs.
The Leave No One Behind Concept of
the SDGs means that all necessary measures need to be taken an On Time towards
ensuring that All Communities in each of the 3 Categories of Countries that are
Off Track need to be effectively supported to achieve Delivery on the SDGs
Pledge by end 2030 and those Communities that are On Track in each of the 2
Categories are given required support to ensure that they indeed achieve
delivery on SDGs Pledge by end 2030.
Achieving Delivery on SDGs Pledge
in each of the 3 Categories of Countries in barely 11 years to end 2030 target
date greatly depends on Design and delivery of National and International
Development Cooperation Radical/Fundamental and Rapid/Fast Change on 4
Pillars:-
1. Inclusive
Communication and Inclusive Education
2. Integrated
Innovation and Coordinated
Entrepreneurship
3. Leadership
and Followership
4. Systems:
Political, Economic, Financial, Social etc
Reform and Service Reform: Civil Service, Public Service, Military
Service etc
with minimum certain levels of
Development Interventions (Policies, Programs, Projects) as applicable or
appropriate in each specific Society – Community, Sub-Country, Country,
Sub-Continent, Continent and Planet/Global location context.
Inclusive Communication: Communication
for Sustainable Development; Communication for Sustainable
Production; Communication
for Sustainable Consumption
and Communication
for Sustainable Citizenship;
Attitudinal and Behavioral Change
Communication; Political and Behavioral Change Communication; Economic and
Behavioral Change Communication; Social and Behavioral Change Communication;
Cultural and Behavioral Change Communication; Climate Change and Behavioral Change
Communication; Environmental and Behavioral Change Communication; Arts and
Behavioral Change Communication; Entertainment, Education and Behavioral Change
Communication; Development Impact and Behavioral Change Communication;
Communication for Behavioral Impact; Changing Attitude and Behavior at Scale
Communication
Inclusive
Education: Education for Sustainable
Development; Education for Sustainable Production; Education for Sustainable
Consumption and Education for Sustainable Citizenship as One that is within
Universal / One Worldwide Approach / Whole of Community / Whole of UNO / Whole
of Government / Whole of Country / Whole of Society Approach is a Master Key for achieving delivery on SDGs
Pledge. It is Fail in One Fai in All.
The Big Challenge is “How the
Implementation and Evaluation Country Sustainability Strategy in UK, 27 EU Countries
and remaining 165/278 UN Member States; SDGs in UK, 27 EU Countries and
remaining 165/278 UN Member States is to be Organized and in ways that achieve
Delivery on SDGs Pledge in all 193/306 UN Member States by end 2030 target
date?”
The Big
Question
The Overarching
Big Question is HOW to get all 193/306 UN Member States back On Track to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in barely 11 years remaining?
The Answer:
For All 193/306 UN Member States should get back On Track to achieve delivery
on SDGs Pledge in barely 11 years remaining, World Leaders should agree Multi Stakeholder Partnerships/Platforms,
MSPs Community to Global Framework deploying One Worldwide Approach for delivery
on SDGs Pledge within an All
Inclusive, All Embracing, Ambitious SDGs Implementation and Evaluation Agenda
robust enough for achieving increasing convergence between All Inclusive, All
Embracing, Ambitious SDGs Agenda Vision Intention and Reality in all 193/306 UN
Member States.
The One Worldwide Approach that Work need
to be:-
- Whole of Community Approach; Whole of Bank Approach; Whole of Institution Approach; Whole of UN System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO Approach; Whole of Government Approach; Whole of Country Approach and Whole of Society Approach as One;
- Deployed within Backbone Global MSP with Global and National Multi Stakeholder Partnerships/Platforms, MSPs for delivery on SDGs Pledge in all 193/306 UN Member States as applicable or appropriate in each specific Community, Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent and Global location context.
UK / EU Brexit as Force for Good – Tackling Implementation Challenge
Brexit as Force for Evil will
seriously undermine work towards achieving the SDGs Pledge Delivery in all 3
Categories of Countries by end 2030 target date. To achieve the SDGs Pledge
Delivery in all 193/306 UN Member States by end 2030 target date, Brexit needs
to be Force for Good.
It is now clear to UK, 27 EU Counties
and EU Authorities that whichever way ongoing negotiations end, root cause or
primary cause Brexit problems, would not have been addressed and would in
reality have been made worse.
It should be clear to all remaining
North Countries and all South Countries
in our World today, that the UK needs to be Saved from Itself; Ireland needs to
be Saved from Itself, each of the remaining 26 EU Countries need to be Saved
from itself; EU needs to be Saved from Itself; that NONE of these Countries and
the EU can on their own Save Themselves from Themselves; that should they keep
sitting by looking on, UK Woes, Ireland Woes, remaining 26 EU Countries Woes
will have contagion effect on their own Woes.
The implication is that all necessary measures need to be
Taken and On Time, to shift from Brexit as Force for Evil, before
Irreversibility Point is Passed and shift to Brexit as Force for Good.
One Worldwide Approach and New Ways of DOING Things - 3PCM One
Worldwide Approach
Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management, 3PCM One Worldwide Approach
to National and International Development Cooperation eliminates Multiple
Approaches by National and International Stakeholders in specific Society, many
of which are divergent thus undermining Communication Strategy or Living
Strategy Objectives.
3PCM delivers Medicine to Fit Disease through ensuring Correct
Diagnosis as basis for Correct Prescription as basis for Correct
Surgery/Treatment as basis for Correct Recovery Management. This underlines
Consultative Research and Diagnostic Studies as Foundation of Development
Interventions – Policies, Programs and Projects: Research, Planning,
Data/Statistics; Implementation; Monitoring, Evaluation; Learning,
Results/Measuring Success; Transparency, Accountability, Participation;
Ownership, Harmony, Alignment as One and as applicable or appropriate in each
specific Society location context.
If Governments, UNO and Universities are to be effective part of
addressing these real and complex problems on the ground in UK, EU and
Worldwide; Governments, UNO and Universities needs to appreciate urgent need
for One Worldwide Approach like 3PCM;
SBCC need to do more to
PUSH for New Ways of DOING Things in UK, EU and World:
and Governments, UNO and Universities need to meaningfully address
Business Participation and related issues raised here
Participatory Communication
Dialogue is the key for
development. If civil society as well as businesses, are to take a larger role
in conceiving and working for True Sustainable Development – National and
Global Goals, then, dialogue is unavoidable. If Donors, Development Agencies
and UNO Agencies on one hand and North/South Governments and Universities on
the other hand and their National and International Partners including Think
Tanks are ready to change their practices and their relation with business and
the civil society, then dialogue is essential at the community level.
Participatory
communication movements are an invitation to dialogue, which ought not to be
refused, if all real and complex National and Global International Development
Cooperation Radical/Fundamental and Rapid/Fast Changes issues on the ground as
applicable or appropriate in each specific Community, Sub-Country, Country,
Sub-Continent, Continent and Global location context, are to be identified and
solved and in ways that meaningfully help all 193/306 UN Member States to
achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in barely 11 years remaining to end 2030 target
date.
Achieving
Delivery on SDGs Pledge in barely 11 years left to 2030
Should Governments,
UNO and Universities be ready to work effectively with UK, 27 EU Countries and
EU Authorities to shift from Brexit as Force for Evil to Brexit as Force for
Good as Viable Option for Design and delivery of National, Regional and Global
Integrated Innovative Sustainable Solutions to UK is in Crises and UK is the
Crisis; each of the 27 EU Countries is
in Crises and each of the 27 EU Countries is the Crisis; EU is in Crises and EU is the Crisis and
World is in Crises and each of the 193/306 UN Member States is the Crisis and
in time to save UK, EU and World from looming catastrophic consequences of
Brexit as Force for Evil, there is strong need for the 3 Categories of Countries to make best use
of the next 5 Quarters – October 2019 – December 2020 to lay Strong Foundation
and indeed Mark Turing Point in the Great Task of getting all 193/306 UN Member
States back On Track to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in barely 11 years left
to end 2030 target date.
Development Communication Fit for the 21st Century
Development Communication Fit
for the 21st Century is the Study of Political, Cultural, Economic,
Financial, Social, Religious, Peace, Security, Environmental and Governance
Change brought about by the effective application of Communication Research,
Development, Theory, Practice and Technologies to bring about True Sustainable
Development in both North and South Countries.
True Sustainable Development is a widely Participatory Process of
Political, Cultural, Economic, Financial, Social, Religious, Peace, Security,
Environmental and Governance Change in a Society – Community, Sub-Country,
Country, Sub-Continent, Continent or Planet intended to bring about both
Welfare and Material Advancement of All Peoples in the Society, especially Poor
Children, Youth, Women, Men and Elders, including Greater Equality, Freedom,
Solidarity, Rights and other Valued Qualities for All the People, through their
gaining greater control over their Livelihood and Environment.
Development Communication that achieves True Sustainable Development
is Participatory Communication or Inclusive Communication – Social and
Behavioural Change Communication, Commutation for Behavioural Impact, Changing
Attitude and Behaviour at Scale etc. Inclusive Communication cannot Stand Alone
but needs to be Integral Part of Inclusive Education – Education for
Sustainable Development, Education for Sustainable Production, Education for
Sustainable Consumption and Education for Sustainable Citizenship.
If all 193/306 UN Member States are to get back On Track to achieve
delivery on SDGs Pledge in barely 10 years remaining to 2030, Inclusive
Communication Must have Strategic Impact in National and International
Development Cooperation Radical/Fundamental and Rapid/Fast Change at Minimum
Certain Levels in All Countries.
New
National, Regional and Global Initiatives – Governments, UNO, Universities Role
Governments, UNO and Universities needs to be effective part of New
National, Regional and Global Initiatives for:-
- Making 4th Agriculture Revolution (Crops, Forestry,
Livestock, Fisheries and Aquaculture: Pre Harvest, Harvest and Post
Harvest) work for the World Poor – 5 of 8.5 Billion People – Children,
Youth, Women, Men and Elders in our World of 2030.
- Making 4th Industrial Revolution (including
Digitization) work for the World Poor (as identified)
- Making Globalization (Original Globalization as described above)
work for the World Poor (as identified)
- Making Governance (including National and International Public
Sector Management) work for the World Poor (as identified)
- Making Brexit (as Force for Good) work for the World Poor (as
identified, not just Poor in UK and EU)
- Making Communication (inclusive Communication and inclusive
Education as defined in EAG Papers) work for World Poor (as identified)
- Making Development (all Services, Sectors, Issues) work for the
World Poor (as identified)
Governments, UNO and Universities need to appreciate that in the work
towards achieving National, Regional and Global Goals and in ways that achieve
Delivery on SDGs Pledge in UK, 27 EU Countries and remaining 165/278 UN Member
States in barely 11 years remaining to end 2030 Target date, it is FAIL in any
One of the above 7 Initiatives, FAIL in ALL 7 Initiatives.
Filling Information, Knowledge, Research and Ambition Gaps
The Busan Declaration, BD 2011 and its Global Partnership for
Effective Development Cooperation, GPEDC were intended to fill gaps in Paris
Declaration, PD 2005. In agreeing BD and GPEDC World Leaders did not Learn
Lessons from PD Flaws and Failures as well as PD Results and Successes.
Also in agreeing SDGs 2015, World Leaders did not Learn Lessons from
MDG Flaws and Failures as well as MDG Results and Successes.
As long as these Lessons remain unlearnt, BD, GPEDC and MDG mistakes
will keep re-occurring as this explain why all 193/306 UN Member Countries are
Off Track in 15 of 60 Quarters of SDG Implementation and unless remedial action
is taken and on time, would remain Off Track by 60 of 60 Quarters of SDG
Implementation. Allowed to occur, the ultimate consequences will be
catastrophic for our fragile Planet.
The SDGs underlines the importance of World Leaders agreeing Global
Goals but does not specify HOW Resources – Financial Capital, Physical Capital,
Human Capital and Network Capital that are
Adequate, Available, Affordable and Accessible in each specific Community,
Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent and Global levels would be
Mobilized nor does it specify HOW the
Resources when Mobilized would be Deployed within Research, Planning, Data;
Implementation; Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning, Results; Transparency,
Accountability, Participation and in ways that achieve SDGs Pledge Delivery in
all 193/306 UN Member States in the barely 11 years remaining to end 2030
target date.
The reality that all 193/306 UN Member States are Off Track achieving
delivery on SDGs Pledge as at 15 of 60 Quarters of SDG Implementation underline
urgent need for Instruments that effectively Fill SDGs Pledge Delivery
Information, Knowledge, Research and Ambition Gaps:-
1 1. To be
tested in practical application (and possibly altered in the light of results
thus to be obtained) before being proposed to the signatories of the SDGs.
2 2. Such
testing should take place at two levels: (a) the Intervention level of
Policies, Programs and Projects (PPPs) on the one hand and (b) the level of the
International Development Cooperation System (IDCS), as a whole, on the other:
(a) The Intervention Level:
The easiest way to test the approach would be the
application of the 3PCM to PPPs at the inception stage of the PPP cycle. Then,
the ToR of the formulation of (i) the PPP Idea; the (ii) Pre-feasibility study;
the (iii) Feasibility study; the (iv) Financing Proposal and Convention; the
(v) Implementation and Monitoring Documents; and the (vi) “In.-Itinere”,
“End-of PPP” and “Ex-post” Evaluations, could all be conceived and structured
on the basis of the 3PCM. However, in this case such application would deliver
the results of the validity of the 3PCM Approach only after the end of the PPP
cycle. Therefore, the 3PCM can, and should, first be tested taking into
consideration already ongoing PPPs: Thus, the stage of the cycle reached by the
PPP under consideration should first be ascertained, and then the ToR corresponding
to that stage would be designed on the basis of the 3PCM, making sure that the
specifics of the case under consideration would be fully taken into account:
For example, if the PPP considered would have reached stage (iii) of the cycle,
then the ToR for the feasibility study would have to be established and the
study to executed on that basis; likewise, if the cycle had reached, in stage
(vi), the “End-of PPP” point in time, then the ToR for the corresponding
Evaluation would have to be worked out, still on the basis of the 3PCM, and the
evaluation would be executed on that basis; etc...
(b) The System Level:
The 3PCM is designed to overcome (or at least to
limit) the weaknesses of the present International Development Co-operation
System. The “Medicine” (the 3PCM) has to fit the “Disease”, and therefore the
“Diagnosis” has to be correct. Also the “Implementation” has to be correct.
Thus, consultative research and diagnostic
studies will have to ascertain whether the following statements are correct or not:
(bi): Development Interventions (PPPs) are not,
in general, squarely concentrating on the creation of Sustainable Benefits for
their Target Groups;
(bii): PPPs often are failing to consider ALL of
the important aspects experience teaches are essential for successful
Development Interventions;
(biii) ToR throughout the PPP cycle tend to be
conceived in an ad-hoc fashion, making it difficult to profit from lessons
learned in the past;
(biv) decision making discipline is often not
being observed at the passage from one phase in the PPP cycle to the following
one;
(bv) existing commissioning framework tend to be
conceived in ways that make it difficult for the most innovative and creative
solutions provider to emerge preferred bidder.
(bvi) existing competencies framework tend to be
conceived in ways that make it difficult for all necessary Hard Competencies –
Learning and Skills and Soft Competencies – Character, Courage, Cultural, Discipline
and Mindset to be acquired and deployed throughout the PPP cycle.
(bvii) and thus: “Lesson forgetting” tends to
proceed at the same pace as “Lesson Learning” through evaluations, making
operational feed-back sporadic at best and virtually impossible in actual fact.
Are
these statements correct, partially correct or incorrect? It is essential to
find out through 3PCM Testing! Answers will help put all 193/306 UN Member
States On Track to achieve Delivery on SDGs Pledge in barely 11 years remaining
to end 2030 target date.
3PCM
Testing: Invitation – Call for Expression of Interest
In 3PCM Testing the Development Intervention is the Project and the
Project is the Development Intervention and this explain why Correct answer is
found to SDGs Pledge Delivery How Questions and related How Questions including
Development Communication How Questions. This will involve:-
1 1. Catalyzing Transformational Change – Making Paradigm Shifts –
Arithmetic Progression to Geometric Progression; MDG Mode to SDGs Mode; Working
in Silos to Working in Synergy etc.
2 2. Creating National and international Architecture for Re-establishing
Existing Disciplines and Professions and Establishing New Disciplines and
Professions.
3 3. Deploying Technology – Information, Internet, Computer, Energy,
Electricity, Bio, Science, Agricultural, Medical, Engineering, Laboratory,
Space, Broadcast, Print, Management etc as appropriate or applicable in each
specific Community, Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent and Global -
Society location context.
3PCM Testing will be
within:-
- Countries Global Goals Project;
- UNO Global Goals Project and
- Universities Global Goals Project as One.
Interventions in (1) and (2) essentially aim to finding answer to
National and International Development Cooperation Radical/Fundamental and
Rapid/Fast Change at levels adequate to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge by 2030
HOW Questions and related Development Communication; Finance for Development;
Monitoring and Evaluation, Climate Change, Environmental Sustainability, Technology
for Development etc HOW Questions as appropriate or applicable in each specific
Community, Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent and Global - Society
location context.
Interventions in (3) essentially aim at effectively mobilizing 4 University
Communities – Academic Staff, Non Academic Staff; Post Graduate Students and
Undergraduate Students as One through Doctoral Academic Research and
Professional Research Programs on Global Sustainable Development; Global
Sustainability Governance and Global Development Communication Part Time and
Full Time as well as Fee Paying and Student Paid Driving University Training, Research,
Consultancy and Volunteering for achieving Delivery on SDGs Pledge in barely 11
years remaining to end 2030 target date, as appropriate or applicable in each
specific Community, Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent and Global -
Society location context where the University operate.
We hereby invite Expression of Interest from Governments, UNO,
University willing to participate in 3PCM Testing Pilot Program and Scale Up
Program as Viable Options for Sustainable Solutions to UK/EU Brexit as well as
for getting all 193/306 UN Member States On Track to achieve delivery on SDGs
Pledge in the barely 11 years remaining to end 2030 target date.
In Sum
A New UK, A New Europe and A New
World is Possible, if Governments, UNO, Universities are ready to PUSH for
Configuring our World / Changing our World for Sustainable Solutions to real
and complex problems on the ground within each of the 193/306 UN Member States;
each of the 5 Continents and
Globally that the SDGs 2030
World Transformation Agenda seek to help find, should Governments, UNO,
Universities authorities support implementation and evaluation of National and
Global Integrated Innovative Sustainable Solutions Innovations set out in this
message.
It is our hope that
opportunity for bright prospects of success
would not be lost. To avoid this answer
to SDGs Pledge Delivery HOW Questions and related How Questions need to be
found within the 3PCM Testing 3 Steps:
(Step 1) Orientation Workshop, Surveys - Management, Financial, Engineering;
(Step 2) Implementing (1) Outcome Document Conclusions and Recommendations and
(Step 3) Feeding back Implementation Lessons Learnt into (2)
As One Day Delay
taking Remedial Action may be One Day too late, we urge UNO Entities, Powerful North
Countries Governments, Powerful South Countries Governments and Top
Universities in the World, Influential Philanthropy Organizations and
Influential Global Media Organizations genuinely
interested in achieving delivery on SDGs Pledge in barely 11 years
remaining to end 2030 target date to Partner
with our Organization on Implementation
of EAG Intervention Idea though 3PCM Testing. Interested Governments, Universities, Philanthropy
Organizations and Media Organization to please send us email on the topic “3PCM Testing: Pilot Program and Scale Up Program”.
Contact:
Director General
Economic Alliance
Group
(Global Integrated
Innovative Sustainable Solutions Provider)
Affiliate Members:
International Society for Poverty Elimination
(Global Social
Development Innovation Organization);
ER and Associates
Limited
(National and
International Development Cooperation Consultants)
New End Hunger,
Malnutrition and Poverty, NEHMAP Initiative
(Global Social
Economy and Social Enterprise Organization) etc
M: +234-8162469805
Website: www.nehmapglobal.org
