ISPE EAG
INTERATIONAL
SOCIETY FOR POVERTY ELIMINATION ECONOMIC
ALLIANCE GROUP
Achieving AAAA, SDG and COP21 Outcome Document Vision and Words with
Action Agenda by 2030 in 193 Member States – Part 8
In Parts (1) – (7) we articulated AAAA, SDG,
COP21, Agenda 21 How questions and suggested ways and means of finding
sustainable solutions to these questions, fully implementing these solutions
with effective monitoring and evaluation of this implementation in each
Community in each Local Government in each of the 193 Member States.
It is a puzzle that Managers and Decision Makers on State
Actors and Non State Actors sides in UN Headquarters New York appear more
interested in talking and thinking than in action and accomplishment. The result
is that they parrot change and business unusual as basis for achieving AAAA,
SDG COP21, Agenda 21 Vision ambitions by 2030 Target date in each of the 193
Member States but demonstrate anti change and business as usual in the AAAA,
SDG, COP21, Agenda 21 processes.
Working Papers: UK
Presidency of UN Security Council Response?
We prepared a Working Paper to suggest ways in which the UK
Presidency could use outcome of 17 November 2015 UN Security Council Open
Debate to nudge the UN Security Council towards better delivery on the How of
Peace and Security that is aligned and harmonized with better UN System
delivery on the How of AAAA, SDG, Agenda 21, COP21 Outcome, other Global Goals
on one hand and aligned and harmonized with better Country System delivery on
the How of AAAA, SDG, Agenda 21, COP21 Outcome, other Global Goals in the US,
UK, France, Germany, other Developed Countries, Nigeria, Brazil, India, China,
other Developing Countries; CSOs’, Foundations etc on the other hand.
It is a puzzle that the many good ideas and pertinent
suggestions set out in the Working Paper were ignored, even at a time of the
Paris attacks. The result, the 17 November 2015 UN Security Council Open Debate
ended up answering What and Why questions while avoiding or evading answer to
How questions, Who does What, Who pays for What, Sanctions and Enforcement
questions.
The French President is having meeting with UK Prime Minister
and other World Leaders to find ways of improving Global Collective Action for
Peace and Security. However, basic solutions to root problems continue to be
avoided or evaded. Will World Leaders knowingly or unknowingly fall into ISIS
trap through failure to address root problems? Can Selfishness and Sabotage -
Intra and Inter State continue without consequence?
GA Second Committee
Draft Proposals / Resolutions: Business as Usual?
The UN General Assembly Second Committee is considering
several Draft Proposals or Resolutions. Please find a selection:-
International
Financial System and Development
2nd UN Decade for Eradication
of Poverty (2008 – 2017)
Agricultural
Technology for Development
Operational Activities
for Development of the UN System
UN Decade of
Education for Sustainable Development (2005 – 2014)
Commodities
Follow Up to the
International Conference on Financing for Development
Agriculture Development,
Food Security and Nutrition
Financial Inclusion
for Sustainable Development
Implementation
of Agenda 21, the Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the
outcomes of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, the United Nations
Conference on Sustainable Development and the United Nations summit for the
adoption of the post-2015 development agenda
We are
concerned that these Resolutions / Proposals like the Parent Resolutions /
Proposals – AAAA and SDG are Vision and Words without Action; they answer What
and Why questions but evade answer to How, Who does What, Who Pays for What,
Sanctions and Enforcement questions. There is urgent need to take fundamental
issues of AAAA, SDG, Agenda 21, COP21 Outcome etc Implementation as well as M
& E more seriously.
We urge
the GA Second Committee not to pass / adopt these Resolutions / Proposals in
current form but to rework same to ensure better GA Second Committee delivery
on the How.
We urge
the five remaining GA Committees, UNGA, UN Security Council, UNCEB, OPGA, EOSG,
ECOSOC, UNDESA, FfD Office, UNESCO, UNDP, UNICEF, UNEP, UNFPA, FAO, WHO to
rework their respective Agenda to ensure each UN Entity record better delivery
on the How within its Vision, Mission and Mandate.
Facing Unshakeable
Facts and Realities on Ground in World As Is?
The Migration Component of the ongoing Europe Crisis
underline urgent need for State Actors and Non State Actors in UN Headquarters
New York as Agents; their Principals in their World Headquarters and Home
National Governments in 193 Member States and UN Family Organization, including
WBG, IEG-WBG and IMF Executives at Global and Regional levels to face
unshakeable facts and realities on the ground in World as is and not as any
stakeholder, no matter how powerful wish it to be.
It is not helpful for European Countries to be
building border fences and repatriating refugees. It is helpful for them to
correctly identify all root problems through correct diagnosis and come up with
correct prescription, surgery and recovery management. For example - What is
the contribution of agriculture subsidy where a cow gets US$ 2 per day but over
2 Billion poor people live on less that US$ 2 per day? What is the contribution
of subsidies that contribute to overfishing and
illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing? What is the contribution of
accommodating illicit financial flows in Europe Banking System?
Europe is grappling with about 1
million migrants and is unable to cope. What happens if unwillingness and or
inability to effectively address these root problems result in 10 million or
100 million migrants? What are the implications for such magnitude of Migration
for Europe Security – National and Regional? Can these root problems be
effectively and efficiently addressed without village to global stakeholders
adopting / adapting points we make in our submissions?
If UN Executives do not know why
AAAA, SDG, Agenda 21, Data Revolution Report, Synthesis Report is each Vision
and Words without Action; they will not know how to make AAAA, SDG, Agenda 21,
Data Revolution Report, Synthesis Report Vision and Words with Action.
ISPE / EAG suggestion that Synthesis
Report How questions be answered before Final Synthesis Report in Official 6 UN
languages are released, even if release is delayed by two weeks to 15 January
2015, was ignored.
1 year after releasing Synthesis
Report, its Recommendations – particularly One Worldwide Approach, Business
Unusual etc have not been implemented by UN Headquarters or 193 Member States.
The result is that fundamental issues settled in the Synthesis Report remained
contentious in FfD / AAAA and SDG processes leading to World Leaders endorsing
AAAA in July 2015 and SDG in September 2015 that is each Vision and Words
without Action and answers to How questions are still being sought after
endorsement of AAAA and SDG. The Cart has been put before the Horse. There is
urgent need to ensure that the Horse is put before the Cart through ensuring
that UNSDS 2015 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21
Outcome, Agenda 21 etc transform into Vision and Words with Action.
As long as points made in our
submissions are not effectively addressed by Decision Makers – Governments of
193 Member Countries and Executives of UN Family Organization Entities, finding
correct answers to UNSDS 2015 Outcome,
AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 etc How questions and in ways that help
achieve Global Goals by the 2030 Target date in each Community in each of 193
Member States could be a mirage.
The Report of this consultation to find answer to
UNSDS 2015 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 etc How questions is
expected to be released by UN Secretary General in December 2015 and to be
discussed by ECOSOC in March 2016. If the point that answer to UNSDS 2015
Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 etc How questions is best found in
DOING then One day delay in adopting existing sustainable solutions is One day
too long.
It is pertinent to note that in finding correct answer
to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 etc How questions
New York based State Actors, Non State Actors and UN Executives appear to focus
on Sustainable Development Model they are interested in. This is a major
problem that reinforced disconnect between each Community in each of the 193
Member States and UN Headquarters New York.
However, these New York based State Actors, Non State
Actors and UN Executives are Agents. The Principals are on State Actors side –
3 Arms: Executive, Legislature and Judiciary of 2 – 4 Tiers of Government in
193 Member States; Non State Actors side – Family, Banks and other Financial
Institutions, NGOs’ / CBOs’, Traditional Institutions, Religious Institutions,
Academic Institutions, Media Institutions, Formal Private Sector, Informal
Private Sector, Trade Groups / Trade Unions and the Agents need to Jointly
focus on Sustainable Development Model that is in Global Interest.
To achieve this the Gap between Political Leadership
we have in each location – Village to Global and the Political Leadership we
need to correctly answer UNSDS 2015 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda
21 etc How questions, fully implement these answers with effective monitoring
and evaluation of this implementation need to be filled without delay.
Integrating
Water, Agriculture, Sanitation, Health Education, Enterprise and Nutrition.
No one’s needs divide neatly into our
professional sectors, and sustainable wellbeing and prosperity will not come
from fragmented interventions. A holistic approach to the implementation and
evaluation of UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21,
Agenda 21 etc spanning across all these domains is urgently needed. ISPE / EAG
is the only Organization advocating for this need to be addressed and
suggesting practical ways of doing this including drawing the attention of
relevant authorities to the most advance One Worldwide Approach – 3PCM
available anywhere in our World today.
The linkages between Water, Agriculture,
Sanitation and Health: WASH and Health, Education, Enterprise and Nutrition:
H2EN needs to be better appreciated by Managers and Decision Makers on State
Actors and Non State Actors in UN Headquarters New York and 193 Member States
sides, if UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21,
Agenda 21 Vision ambitions are to be achieved in each Community in each Local
Government in each of the 193 Member States by 2030 target date.
It is pertinent to note that Water
Scarcity is the current biggest threat to Global Prosperity, that parts of US
and Middle East are currently dried up; that dried up parts of the World will
continue to increase, if remedial action is not taken and on time and that
should these dried up parts of the World continue to increase, it is not just
Global Prosperity that will be threatened but also Global Security.
Renewed
Global Movement Against Poverty
The Global Movement Against Slavery did not succeed
until the UK Parliament and US Presidency gave more focused and determined
support. A Global Movement Against Poverty that will be successful on
sustainable basis require at least twice the effort put into the Global
Movement Against Slavery. Yet what we have at present is Global Movement
Against Poverty that is less than half the effort put into Global Movement
Against Slavery. That is current effort needs to be scaled up by at least
factor of Four.
The UK Presidency of the UN Security Council present
opportunity for UK and US Parliaments to persuade and if necessary pressure
remaining 191 Parliaments and UK Government and US Government to persuade and
if necessary pressure remaining 191 Countries Governments to jointly achieve
this factor of Four Scaling up of the Global Movement Against Poverty in the
Common Interest, Common Future and Common Humanity of Citizens in each of the
193 Member States.
The US Presidency of the UN Security Council, December
2015 can avoid the mistake of the UK Presidency of the UN Security Council
through demonstrating and being seen to demonstrate genuine commitment towards
effectively addressing all serious issues of serious business raised in the
Paper and related Papers.
Transformation
of Society
The
Transformation of Society in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and World is key
to finding, implementing and evaluating correct answer to UNSDS 2015 Outcome,
ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, Synthesis
Report, Data Revolution Report etc How questions and call for:-
1.
Government – Political Leaders and
Senior Civil Servants: Political Commitment; Government Coordination and
Government Regulation.
2.
Professionals - Scientists,
Designers, Generalist Subject Matter Experts and Specialist Subject Matter
Experts: Innovation Solutions, Technology Solutions and Science Solutions
3.
Farmers – Rural Peoples
Organizations, Commodity Trade Groups, Agriculture Value Chains: Learning, Self
Regulation and Partnership
4.
Citizens – Individual Consumers,
Commercial Consumers, Industrial Consumers: Patronage, Collective Action and
Common Interest
5.
Consultants – Technical Advisers,
Support Providers, Reform Advisers: Language, Approach and Framework
Paradigm
Shifts
1.
Shift
focus away from problems and passing blame and shift focus towards solutions
and opportunities
2.
Shift
focus away from Talking and Thinking and shift focus towards Action and
Accomplishment
3.
Shift
focus away from working HARDER doing the same old things in the same old ways
and shift focus towards working SMARTer doing new things in new ways
4.
Shift
focus away from academic research advancing the frontiers of knowledge and
shift focus towards development research increasing productivity, quality,
service, costs and revenue where applicable.
To make
the shifts necessary to tackle identified real and complex problems on the
ground on successful and sustainable basis, Developed Countries Governments;
Developing Countries Governments; International Institutions; Academic
Community; Media Community and Sub-national, National and International
Development Cooperation Partners need:-
1.
Better
established Incentive Structures for each Stakeholder Group
2.
Effective
removal of all Administrative Barriers to more flexible Joint Country
Programming Frameworks
3.
Effective
solutions to all Staffing Issues: Competencies Sets – Hard Competencies:
Learning and Skills and Soft Competencies: Character, Courage and Mindset
4.
Adequate
provision of Resources: Influence, Science, Technology, Innovation, Art, Fund,
Manpower, Spiritual, Land, Water.
5.
Meet Appetite:
Interest – Political, Economic, Social, Cultural etc
6.
Manoeuvres
amidst Constraints: identify where is the room for manoeuvre or how it can be
created to make support of Development Reform possible
National Integrity System
The success implementing UNSDS 2015 Outcome, SDG, AAAA, COP21 Outcome,
Agenda 21, Synthesis Report and Data Revolution Report etc in each Community in
each Local Government in each of the 193 Member States, greatly depends on
Design and Delivery of a National Integrity System that will have:-
1.
Analytical Framework that effectively addresses the following
fundamental issues – The Challenge of Reform; The Anatomy of Corruption;
Developing Responses to Corruption; the National Integrity System and Building
Political Will.
2.
The Institutional Pillars of the National Integrity System that
effectively delivers on their statutory roles, duties and responsibilities -
Legislature, Executive, Judiciary, Auditor General, Ombudsman, Anti Corruption
Agencies, Civil Service / Public Service / Security Service; Media; Civil
Society; Religious Institutions; Traditional Institutions; Academic
Institutions, Informal Private Sector, Formal Private Sector, International
Actors and Mechanisms.
3.
Rules and Practices for the Institutional Pillars – Free and Fair
Elections; Judicial Review of Official Actions; Civil Service / Public Service
/ Security Service Ethics; Monitoring Assets; Integrity Testing; Conflict of
Interest; Nepotism; Cronyism; Public Procurement; Public Financial Management;
Right to Information; Giving Citizens a Voice; Competition Policy and
Containing Corruption; Anti Corruption Laws; Measuring Progress; Lessons
Learning; Citizen and Stakeholders Participation and Building Public Support
for Anti Corruption Efforts.
Yes the National Integrity System in Developed
Countries are much better than those in Developing Countries but all 193 Member
States need to improve their National Integrity Systems.
It is pertinent to note that corruption in New York
alone make corruption in Nigeria child’s play. It is unhelpful to demonize
corrupt persons in Developing Countries, including Nigeria high on the Bribe
Takers Index and turn blind eye to corrupt persons in Developed Countries,
including US, UK, France, Germany, Russia high on the Bribe Payers Index.
One Nationwide / Worldwide
Approach
Answers to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, Data
Revolution, Synthesis Report where questions (including what and why questions)
and How questions at Sub-national, National, Sub-regional, Regional and Global
levels need to be found through:-
1.
Orientation Workshops
2.
Management Surveys
3.
Financial Surveys
4.
Engineering Surveys
5.
Desk Analysis of Reports – Conference and Study
for Headquarters Management and each Strategic Business Unit in the MDA
/ Entity, processed into Master Plans with ACTION setting out Priorities,
Direction, Sequence and Pace of Action Agenda Items required to achieve Goals
and Targets in all its ramifications:-
1.
Planning Side – Research, Planning and Data
2.
Implementation Side – Implementation
3.
Evaluation Side – Monitoring, Evaluation and Assessment
4.
Learning Side – Learning and Results
5.
Accountability Side – Transparency, Accountability and Citizen and
Stakeholder Participation.
within One Nationwide / Worldwide Approach to Sustainable National and
International Development Cooperation. Policy, Program
Front End / Back End
Where the above Workshops and Surveys present Front End of Reforms, the
following Initiatives will be the Back End and where these Initiatives present
Front End the Workshops and Surveys will be Back End:-
1.
One Nationwide / Worldwide Approach with Local Context
2.
Consultative Research Management
3.
Development Research Management
4.
Correct Diagnosis, Prescription, Surgery and Recovery Management
5.
Policy, Program, Project Intervention and Policy, Program, Project
Intervention Training as One
6.
Re-establish existing Institutions / Ventures
7.
Establish new Institutions / Ventures
8.
Communication for UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, SDG,
AAAA, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, Synthesis Report etc Management
9.
Country Led Evaluation System Management
10.
Standards Management
11.
Sanctions Management
12.
Celebration Management
Clear
Statements
1.
ISPE /
EAG have no power or intention to force any individual, institution or
government to accept its international development cooperation solutions.
2.
No one
individual, institution or government anywhere in our world today has all the
answers to all of UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG,
COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 etc How questions
3.
Correct
answer to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21
Outcome, Agenda 21 etc How questions cannot be found in Desk Work -
conferences, consultations and research driven by talking and thinking.
4.
Correct
answer to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21
Outcome, Agenda 21 etc How questions can only be found in Desk Work -
conferences, consultations and research and Field Work – theory, practice and
partnership driven by action and accomplishment that is inclusive and
effectively connect each community in each of 193 Member States to UN
Headquarters New York.
5.
Current
AAAA, SDG, COP21 processes each has flaws and failures arising from technical
errors and mistaken priorities from village to global levels that need to be
immediately corrected.
6.
Current
Attitude and Behaviour of most Village to Global Stakeholders on both State
Actors and Non State Actors fall below minimum certain levels required to find
correct answer to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG,
COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 etc How questions, full implement these answers with
effective monitoring and evaluation of this implementation in ways that achieve
Global Goals by 2030 target date.
7.
Current
effort at answering UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG,
COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 etc How questions is at least one year behind. Renewed
effort is required if lost ground is to be covered and if each community in
each of 193 Member States is to accelerate on path to achieving Global Goals by
2030 Target date.
8.
Each
day Decision Makers in each UN Family Organization Entity, 193 Member States
and concerned Non State Actors sides delay or deny adopting or adapting
existing sound answers to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA,
SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 etc How questions is one day too long. Allowed to
continue, the ultimate consequences for our fragile planet could be
catastrophic.
Acid Test of Credibility
The implication of holding UNSDS 2015 after adoption of
SDG on 25 September 2015, is that what World Leaders have adopted is SDG that
is Vision and Words without Action and what UNSDS 2015 seek to achieve is ways
and means of converting current AAAA and SDG into new AAAA and SDG that is
Vision and Words with Action.
The outcome of UNSDS 2015, is that in failing to answer
SDG How questions, the SDG remain Vision and Words without Action. If the
conversion of the SDG to Vision and Words with Action is not achieved without
delay, it will be an uphill task for World Leaders to deliver on their promise
to achieve SDG by 2030. Failure to deliver on this promise, the ultimate
consequences for stakeholders in our fragile Planet could be catastrophic.
The acid test of credibility of SDG, AAAA, Agenda 21,
COP21 etc is how each delivers:-
1.
Better Domestic and International Trade in each of 193 Member
States.
2.
Better Financing – Equity, Loan and Grant for all particularly
the Poor
3.
Better War on Corruption and Terrorism and
4.
Better Environmental Sustainability.
New Thinking, New Ideas, New Ways
of Doing Things etc
The only way World Leaders can deliver on their promise
during the adoption of SDG is to improve Cohesion, Coordination, Collaboration,
Cooperation, Solidarity and Accountability in the design and delivery of mutual
support mechanism that help each of the 193 Member States to pass this acid
test of credibility of the SDGs.
To achieve this, the 193 Member States jointly and
severally must demonstrate and be seen to demonstrate:-
1.
Willingness to accept new ideas, new thinking, new ways of doing
things
2.
Willingness to establish new coordination, new collaboration,
new cooperation, new solidarity, new accountability and new partnership
3.
Readiness to accept past flaws, past failures, past drawbacks,
past shortcomings and past hindrances
4.
Readiness to build bridge between lessons learning and lessons
forgetting, create learning organization and create learning society
5.
Readiness to create Demand for Planning – Research, Planning,
Data as basis for creating Supply for Planning – Research, Planning, Data
6.
Readiness to create Demand for Implementation as basis for
creating supply for Implementation
7.
Readiness to create Demand for Evaluation – Monitoring,
Evaluation, Assessment as basis for creating Supply for Evaluation –
Monitoring, Evaluation, Assessment
8.
Readiness to create Demand for Accountability – Transparency,
Accountability, Citizen / Stakeholder Participation as basis for creating
Supply for Accountability – Transparency, Accountability, Citizen / Stakeholder
Participation
9.
Readiness to create Demand for Learning – Learning and Result as
basis for creating Supply for Learning – Learning and Result
10. Readiness to accept One Nationwide
/ Region wide / Worldwide 3PCM – Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management
Approach and Methodology to Sustainable Benefits focused National and
International Development Cooperation Policy, Program, Project Intervention,
3PI and 3PI Training as One in each Action Agenda Item in each of the 17 SDGs
applicable to specific context – Village to Global in each of the 193 Member
States
AAAA and SDG Village to Global
Capacity Building
The above fundamental issues of Willingness and
Readiness need to be complemented by fundamental issues of Ability – Capacity
Building; Ability – Resources and Invitation – Mandate within National and
Global Platform. Resources include:
Influence, Science, Technology, Innovation, Fund, Manpower, Spiritual, Land and
Water. There are
more than enough Resources to achieve all 17 SDGs in each of the 193 Member
States if World Leaders can get Capacity Building Right in each of the 193
Member States.
Capacity Building should be on three levels:-
1.
Individual – Hard Competences: Learning and
Skills and Soft Competences: Character, Courage and Mindset
2.
Institution / Government – Processes, Procedures, Systems,
Operations that empower Individuals to operationalize in practice Competences
they acquire through formal and informal education and training to help achieve
increasing convergence between Institution / Government Vision, Mission and
Mandate Intention and Reality.
3.
Society – Political and Cultural; Economic and Financial;
Social and Environmental; Peace and Security; Religious and Moral Space that
empower Individuals and Institutions to Thrive in the work towards achieving
Institution / Government Vision, Mission, Mandate Intention and Reality with or
without chaos.
STRENGTHEN
NATIONAL LEVEL CAPACITY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF 2030 SD AGENDA.
We are Greatly Concerned that UNDESA has mandated an Organization - Gestos
with Strength IN HIV AIDS Advocacy to help Train NGOs' in 9 Pilot Countries
Strengthen National level Capacity on Implementation of 2030 SD Agenda. The Big
Questions are How have these 9 Pilot Countries been selected? If it will take
months to carry out the training in just 9 Countries how many years will it
take to scale up the Training to remaining 184 Countries? Can such unduly
prolonged time frame help achieve SDG in each Community in each Local
Government in each of 193 Member States by the 2030 Target date? Is Competency
in HIV AIDS Competency equivalent to Competency in all remaining areas of Heath
Dimension of SDGs' as well as Competency in all remaining Dimensions of all 17
SDG?
If these Competences are LACKING in the Preferred Consultant, what type
of Strengthening National Level Capacity on Implementation as well as
Evaluation of each Action Agenda Item in each of the 17 SDG is being DELIVERED
by the Preferred Consultant? Is it not CLEAR that the Preferred Consultant can
only Perform in its area of proven Competence - HIV AIDS Advocacy and will
CERTAINLY Fail in all other Dimensions of Advocacy in all remaining Action
Agenda Items in all 17 SDG? Is good HIV AIDS Advocacy the same thing as Good
HIV AIDS Policy, Program, Project Interventions, 3PI and 3PI Training as One
Designed and Delivered to Reduce and Ultimately Eradicate HIV AIDS? Again if
this is not the case, has UNDESA or whichever UN Agency is responsible for
Commissioning Preferred Consultant selected the most Competent Consultant that
has demonstrable track record of delivering Value for Money and Fitness for
Purpose within the entire Scope of the Assignment?
Should above observations not be discussed at the next Wednesday Group meeting?
Is ECOSOC Global Consultations complete without discussing these observations? Can
appropriate Remedial Recommendations made to concerned UN Agencies and Authorities
where relevant Technical Platforms such as Wednesday Group, ECOSOC Committees,
GA Committees etc avoid or evade discussing this observation? Should each Entity
within UN Internal and External Publics not have a Unit / Desk with
responsibility for the Entity’s delivery on How?
Working Together To Benefit Together
To help ensure World Leaders deliver on promise to
achieve SDGs’ by 2030, we suggest relevant UN and Non UN authorities undertake
critical review of this and earlier Papers, Policy Briefings and Articles.
Should its assessment confirm that indeed the Papers, Policy Briefings and
articles have many good ideas and pertinent suggestions, which adopted by UNGA,
HLPF, ECOSOC, UN Security Council, 193 Member States Governments and Partners –
Village to Global can help achieve increasing convergence between AAAA and SDG
Vision and Words with Action Intention and Reality in each Community in each
Local Government in each of 193 Member States, we suggest these UN and Non UN
authorities consider taking the following specific action steps:-
1.
Endorse the Papers, Policy Briefings and Articles and request UNDESA
or UNNGLS to circulate the endorsed Papers, Policy Briefings and articles to
all World Leaders, 193 Member States and other AAAA and SDG Stakeholders.
2.
Underline need for Integrated Sustainable Solutions – Political
Solutions, Cultural Solutions, Economic Solutions, Financial Solutions, Social
Solutions, Environment Solutions, Peace Solutions, Security Solutions,
Religious Solutions and Moral Solutions; to Design and Delivery of each Action
Agenda Item in AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document etc applicable to specific
Village to Global location context.
3.
Urge all World Leaders, 193 member States and other AAAA, SDG,
COP21 Outcome Document etc Stakeholders to recognize that Political Solutions
is Master Key to unlocking remaining 9 Integrated Sustainable Solutions.
4.
Urge UNGA, HLPF, ECOSOC, UN Security Council to each pass resolution calling on each of the
193 Member States to adopt recommendations in the Papers, Policy Briefings and Articles
and go further to establish immediately National Integrated Economic Reform
Program, NIEReP for the implementation and evaluation of domesticated AAAA, SDG
and COP21 Outcome Document etc Vision and Words with Action, aligned with
National Development Plan through National Reform Bureau working with Reform
Implementation Unit in each Ministry, Department and Agency in each of the 193
Member States, whose activities are coordinated by Steering Committee on Reform
and National Council on Reform within complimentary Sub-national, National,
Sub-regional, Regional and Global Master Multi Stakeholder Partnership
Platforms.
If SDG, AAAA, COP21 Outcome Document etc
Vision Ambitions are to be achieved and on schedule date, Village to Global
Stakeholders need to Work Together to Benefit Together.
MOVING FORWARD
Do World Leaders, UNDESA, EOSG, UNGA, ECOSOC, HLPF and
Partners recognize that correct answer to all AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome
Document, Agenda 21, FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty Action Plan etc How
questions lie in the DOING? That without immediately:-
1.
Appointing
Reform Adviser and Global Coordinating Consultant on AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome
Document, etc Policy Coherence, Coordination, Collaboration and Cooperation for
Sustainable Development, P4CSD to UNGA, ECOSOC, UN Security Council and HLPF
and Partners
2.
Selecting
One Worldwide Approach
3.
Establishing
Mater Multi Stakeholder Platform, MSP and MSPs for each Action Agenda item
Village to Global, VtG
4.
Establishing
Multidisciplinary Professionals Community of Practice on Poverty Elimination
and Environmental Sustainability as VtG Platform for all relevant existing and
new Disciplines
5.
Addressing
issues of Trust, Silos, Honesty, Thinking, Solidarity, Attitude, Behaviour,
Communication etc VtG
6.
Connecting
each Community in each Local Government in each of the 193 Member States to UN
Headquarters New York
7.
Establishing
VtG Mechanism for Correct Diagnosis, Prescription, Surgery and Recovery
Management
8.
Establishing
VtG Policy, Program, Project Interventions, 3PIs and 3PIs Training as One
9.
Establishing
VtG Mechanism for Ownership, Harmony, Alignment, Accountability, Transparency,
Transformation, Leadership, Learning, Results and Participation (Citizens and
Stakeholders), OH2A2T2LRP
10. Establishing VtG Mechanism for Policy
Coherence, Coordination, Collaboration and Cooperation for Sustainable
Development, P4CSD
11. Establishing VtG Mechanism for Master
Collaborative Research Support Program, CRSP for each Action Agenda Item
It will be uphill task achieving increasing
convergence between UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG,
COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21, FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty etc
Vision Intention and Reality. If these Visions are not achieved by 2030 Target
date, the ultimate consequences for our Fragile Planet could be catastrophic.
About ISPE / EAG
Lanre and colleagues have for over twenty years
made great sacrifices, demonstrated uncommon zeal and exceptional patriotism in
continuing constructive engagement of relevant sub-national, national and
international stakeholders, to jointly focus on comprehensive systemic
solutions to our real and complex national political, economic, social, security,
cultural and religious problems on the ground.
In this period
we have been working spiritedly towards helping to make Nigeria, Africa, UK,
Europe, US and World Hunger and Poverty history and in record time. In this
period also, our Lanre Rotimi (Nigerian) and Dr. Hellmut Eggers (German) have
created 3PCM, Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management Approach to Benefits
focused National and International Development Cooperation – the most advance
such Approach in our World today. 3PCM has been tried and tested, the Biggest
Test so far in NIPOST 2000 – 2001.
3PCM uses
Living Strategy or Communication Strategy and so it is Dynamic and continuing
to improve daily. Glorious Heights reached by NIPOST at the time has NEVER been
equalled even when NIPOST later received Technical Support from Netherlands /
Dutch Postal Administration. We have built considerable expertise, experience
and exposure in Nigeria, UK and EC that bring Whole of Nigeria, Africa, UK,
Europe, US and World Thinking to bear in finding practical solutions to all
identified complex systemic problems in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and
World, fully implementing the solutions and effectively monitoring and
evaluating this implementation in ways that achieve increasing convergence
between National and Global Development Cooperation Goals and Targets Intention
and Reality and on scheduled dates.
International Society for Poverty Elimination,
ISPE, Volunteer Organization, is a Member of Economic Alliance Group, EAG. EAG
has the following additional Members:-
1.
AR & Associates Limited, Strategy and
Development Cooperation Consulting Firm – Research, Planning, Statistics,
Implementation, Monitoring, Evaluation, Assessment, Learning, Results,
Advocacy.
2.
EAG - CLEAR, Centre for Learning in Evaluation and
Results, Evaluation Organization
3.
EAG - CDPM, Centre for Development Policy
Management, Research Organization
4.
EAG – FTS / FFS, Farmers Training School / Farmer
Field School, Food and Agriculture Organization
5.
EAG – ETS / EFS, Enterprise Training School /
Enterprise Field School, Entrepreneurship Development Organization
6.
EAG – PSA / PSE – Public Service Academy / Public
Service Exchange, Public Administration Organization
EAG is neutral
in promoting and protecting Sub-national, National and International Development
Cooperation. EAG work towards supporting Developed Countries Governments;
Developing Countries Governments; International Institutions / International
Foundations / Donors; Organized Communities – Neighbourhood to Global; Media –
National and International to JOINTLY Build National and Global Collective
ACTION for achieving Increasing Convergence between National and Global
Development Cooperation Goals and Targets Intention and Reality and on schedule
dates.
The core
business of the Group is the provision of Services for Strategic Management of
Complex National or International or both National and International
Development Change Processes under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial
Services Arrangement.
AR has been in
business since 1993 but registered in Nigeria in 1995. ISPE has been in
business operating as Economic Alliance International (EAI) since 2002 but
registered in Nigeria in 2007. EAG – CLEAR; EAG – CDPM; EAG – FTS; EAG – ETS;
EAG – PSA are for now domiciled in AR.
EAG has in the
past 20 years spent over US$2 Million (N300 Million) to Develop the 3PCM
Approach as well as its National and Global Development Cooperation Practical
Solutions under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial Services Arrangement
within which we provided the Nigeria Federal Government alone Consultancy
Services worth over UK Pounds 10 Million (N2.5 Billion) Free of Charge. This is
Evidence that we do not have purely Commercial Interest but are Motivated by
Service to Humanity as the Best Work of Life, hence two of our Slogans – Let Us
Work Together to Benefit Together and …Building a Brighter Future as we
Configure our World.
Conclusion
In this Paper and seven earlier Papers we
have raised serious issues of serious business that deserve the serious
attention of World Leaders, 193 Member States, UN Family Organization and
Partners from Village to Global levels. Each day delay in addressing these
fundamental issues is one day too long.
It is incomprehensible that concerned authorities
in the UN System, 193 Member States and CSOs sides continue with Business as
Usual doing the same old things in the same old ways and expecting new Results.
It should be clear to concerned
authorities in the UN System, 193 Member States and CSOs’ sides that without
facing new direction and adopting new priorities; without adopting Business
Unusual doing new things in new ways, the expected new Results will remain
Mirage.
To achieve New Results on Successful and
Sustainable basis, World Leaders need to demonstrate genuine commitment towards
the full implementation with effective monitoring and evaluation of Synthesis
Report, Data Revolution Report, Digital Revolution, Agric Revolution,
Enterprise Revolution, Government Revolution, Applied Research Revolution,
Attitudinal and Behavioural Change Revolution, other Primary Revolutions,
Education Revolution, Health Revolution, Housing Revolution, Financial
Inclusion Revolution, Risk Management Revolution, Anti Corruption Revolution
and other Secondary Revolutions driven by Genuine UN Family Organization,
including WBG, IEG-WBG and IMF Delivery as One, DaO.
Should World Leaders, UN Executives and
CSOs Executives be searching for Sustainable Solutions that exist? In turning
blind eye to these Sustainable Solutions are World Leaders, UN Executives and
CSOs Executives not having Blood on their hands and Scar on their Conscience? Each
Day World Leaders, UN Executives and CSOs Executives delay Organization, Orientation
and Discipline of UN Internal and External Publics to better deliver on the How
is One Day too long.
We are willing to offer a more detailed
information / clarification as directed by GA Second Committee and or other
relevant UN Authority.
Contact:
Director General
International
Society for Poverty Elimination / Economic Alliance Group
5, Moses Orimolade
Avenue,
Ijapo Estate,
Akure, Ondo State,
Nigeria.
M: +234-8162469805
Email: nehap.initiative@yahoo.co.uk 24 November 2015.
