EAG ISPE
ECONOMIC ALLIANCE GROUP INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR POVERTY ELIMINATION
(Global
Integrated Innovative Sustainable Solutions Provider) (Global Social Development Innovation
Organization)
ER&A NEHMAP Initiative
ER and Associates Limited New End Hunger, Malnutrition
and Poverty Initiative
(International Development
Cooperation Consultants) (Global Social Economy and Social
Enterprise Organization)
Achieving Delivery on
SDGs Pledge in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context, in
less than 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date – Urgent Need for UN
System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO (ITO) to Face New Direction and Adopt New Priorities
(3).
EAG Thoughts on Priorities and Direction in the Implementation and
Evaluation of Food, Nutrition, Agriculture and Security Vision Dimension Linked
to Political, Cultural, Economic, Financial, Social, Security, Peace,
Religious, Climate Change, Environmental, Procurement and Governance etc
Dimensions of Transformation Agenda –
AAAA, SDG, COP21, Agenda 21 and NIEO for Delivery on SDG Pledge (No Goal will
be considered met if it is not met by All Peoples in All Countries) by 2030 Target date.
Introduction
As 2nd Quarter 2019 Year 4 of Implementation of SDGs begin,
and all 193/306 UN Member States are still Off Track achieving delivery on SDGs
Pledge by 2030, we again urge World Leaders to recognize that there is an urgent need for them to pause and do
critical review of successes, flaws and failures in past 13 of 60 Quarters of
SDGs Implementation, as basis for Rethinking
SDGs Pledge (which states that No
Goal will be considered met if it is not achieved by all Peoples in all
Countries) for effective delivery
Worldwide, in the 11 ½ years remaining
to end 2030 target date.
In this Paper, we again appeal to the conscience of National
and World Leaders to know that choices
they make – what they do and what they do not do, will determine if SDGs Pledge is achieved
Worldwide or not; that should all Communities, Countries and Continents in our
World today, fail to achieve
delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge by end 2030 target date, the Ultimate Consequences will be Catastrophic for all Citizens,
especially the over 5 billion Poor in all North and South Countries in our
World of 2030 and that there are Bright Prospects
of success should National and World Leaders do the needful and without further delay.
Innovative Sustainable
Solutions
Our world is moving fast. We need smart, workable solutions to the world’s real and complex
problems on the ground in all communities and we need them urgently to keep up with our rapidly Changing Societies –
Community, Country, Continent or Global. More investment in Science, Technology and Innovation (STI)
Innovative Sustainable Solutions is needed but so is more investment in
wider range of VOICES from outside
the traditional STI Innovative
Sustainable Solutions powerhouses of academia and private sector.
More
Innovative Sustainable Solutions can come from- and already
are coming from – young people,
community based organizations, civil society, indigenous groups and more. These
STI Innovative Sustainable Solutions from all sources – researchers, theoreticians, professionals and practitioners
need to be harnessed, aligned, strengthened,
reinforced, harmonized and coordinated to ensure they effectively fill the ambition gap, a necessary condition for the STI
Innovative Sustainable Solutions to effectively help all 193/306 UN Member
States achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge
in 11 ½ years remaining to end 2030 target date.
All of these STI
Innovative Sustainable Solutions as
applicable in
each specific Community, Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent or
Global location context, need to be found,
fully implemented, and with effective monitoring and evaluation of this
implementation, and on time if all 193/306 UN Member States are to get back On Track to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in the 11 ½ years remaining to end
2030 target date.
If National and Global Goals Vision ambitions are to be achieved, there
must be adequate levels of engagement,
energy, innovation and creativity to drive innovative sustainable solutions to all identified real and complex national and international
development cooperation problems on the ground and this include
meaningfully addressing fundamental issues of: frustration, irritation, distrust and downright despair, as well as
inequality, identity, information,
interference that is/are felt by or
challenging concerned State Actors
and Non State Actors, in volatile,
uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (aka, VUCA)1 environment or
climate, in the specific community, sub-country, country,
sub-continent, continent and global location context.
National and World Leaders will do well to
always remember that it takes only One
Community in One Country – North or South to Fail to achieve just 1 Target of 1
of 17 SDGs Goals for all 193/306 UN Member States to jointly Fail to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge.
Worldwide
SDGs Pledge Delivery HOW Questions: No Answer, No Delivery
SDGs, COP21, Agenda 21
Rio and Rio+20 and NIEO are essentially the Goals Framework –
What Stakeholders want to achieve; AAAA is
essentially the Means Framework – How to Mobilize all Forms of Resources
needed to achieve the Global Goals. What is Missing since 2015 to date is the Effectiveness Framework HOW
to achieve increasing convergence
between Global Goals Vision Intention
and Reality in each specific community, sub-country and
country location context, and in the 11
½ years remaining to end 2030 target date. As long as National Leaders and
World Leaders keep avoiding or evading
answer to SDGs Pledge Delivery How Questions and related How Questions, achieving
delivery on SDGs Pledge by end 2030 will be Mirage.
National
and International Stakeholders cannot keep using Multiple Approaches to achieve the 5 Global Goals, some of which are divergent and expect good results. National
Leaders and World Leaders need to recognize that Inclusive Education: Education for Sustainable Development;
Education for Sustainable Production; Education for Sustainable Consumption and Education for Sustainable Citizenship as well as
Relation Based Leadership for the 21st Century
Inclusive Communication: Communication
for Sustainable Development; Communication for Sustainable
Production; Communication
for Sustainable Consumption
and Communication
for Sustainable Citizenship;
Attitudinal and Behavioral Change
Communication; Political and Behavioral Change Communication; Economic and
Behavioral Change Communication; Social and Behavioral Change Communication;
Cultural and Behavioral Change Communication; Climate Change and Behavioral
Change Communication; Environmental and Behavioral Change Communication; Arts and
Behavioral Change Communication; Entertainment, Education and Behavioral Change
Communication; Development Impact and Behavioral Change Communication; Communication
for Behavioral Impact; Changing Attitude and Behavior at Scale Communication as
One that is within Universal / One Worldwide Approach / Whole of Society
Approach is a Master Key for achieving
delivery on SDGs Pledge. It is Fail
in One Fai in All.
The Overarching
Big Question is HOW to get all 193/306 UN Member States back On Track to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in 11 ½ years remaining?
The Answer:
For All 193/306 UN Member States should get back On Track to achieve delivery
on SDGs Pledge in 11 ½ years remaining, World Leaders should agree Multi Stakeholder Partnerships/Platforms,
MSPs Community to Global Framework deploying One Worldwide Approach for delivery
on SDGs Pledge within an All
Inclusive, All Embracing, Ambitious SDGs Implementation and Evaluation Agenda
robust enough for achieving increasing convergence between All Inclusive, All Embracing,
Ambitious SDGs Agenda Vision Intention and Reality in all 193/306 UN Member
States.
The One Worldwide Approach that Work need
to be:-
* Whole of
Community Approach; Whole of Bank Approach; Whole of Institution Approach;
Whole of UN System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO Approach; Whole of Government Approach;
Whole of Country Approach and Whole of Society Approach as One;
* Deployed within Backbone Global MSP with Global and
National Multi Stakeholder Partnerships/Platforms, MSPs for delivery on
SDGs Pledge in all 193/306 UN Member States as applicable or appropriate in
each specific Community, Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent and
Global location context.
Answering SDGs
Pledge How Question is DOING Matter:
Vision and Words with Action and Demand Change Start NOW. Our Organization has
developed SDGs Pledge Delivery by 2030 – 7
Drivers including 3 Step Action
required to achieve Needed Change from
Community to Global levels that effectively demonstrate this DOING as our own contribution towards
finding this Answer.
We urge National
Leaders and World Leaders to genuinely
appreciate that:-
1. EAG Intervention Idea is the Most All Inclusive, All Embracing and
Ambitious 5 Global Goals (SDGs is overarching Global Goal) Aligned and
Harmonized with National Goals and Sub-National Goals in all 193/306 UN Member
States: Implementation and Evaluation Framework adaptable for specific
Community, Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent and Global location
context need, available anywhere in our World today; that the Multiple
Frameworks Integrated Policy, Program, Project Interventions, 3PIs and 3PIs
Training as One using 3PCM One Worldwide
Approach – Whole of Society, Whole of Government etc, to effectively answer
SDGs Pledge Delivery HOW Questions and related HOW Questions deserve effective
support of World Leaders and National Leaders and that to get the Huge and
Complex Work to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in All Countries by 2030 that
need to be done in 11 ½ years, done and on time, the UN System cannot afford to
further delay full Implementation of the EAG Intervention Idea in all 193/306
UN Member States.
2. As long as there
is no Global Central Coordination;
Global Central Sequence and Global Central Pace, at levels required
adequate to fill SDGs All Inclusive, All Embracing and Ambitious Agenda Gaps in
all 193/306 UN Member States and in ways that ensure all 193/306 UN Member
States achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge by end 2030 target date (11 ½ years remaining and so much remaining
to be done) will be Mirage.
3. As long as UN
Agencies; Government Agencies in Public Sector, Organizations in Private Sector
on both North and South Countries sides and Academic Institutions on both North
and South Countries sides
are not meaningfully supported by Intervention Idea as All Inclusive, All
Embracing and Ambitious as EAG Intervention Idea achieving delivery on
SDGs Pledge by end 2030 target date (11 ½ years remaining and so much remaining
to be done) will be Mirage.
4. National Leaders
and World Leaders need to genuinely appreciate jointly that current direction and priorities cannot
ensure answer is found to SDGs Pledge How Questions and related How Questions and
that without answer to SDGs Pledge How Questions and related How Questions
there will be no delivery on SDGs Pledge Worldwide in the 11 ½ years remaining,
hence need for National Leaders and World Leaders to meaningfully support EAG Intervention Idea, or alternative
Robust Intervention Idea (if such is available or could be found anywhere
in our World today) and on time.
Raising US$ 700 Trillion to Fund Worldwide SDGs Pledge Delivery by
2030
New Sub-National
Development Vision, New National Development Vision and New International
Development Vision need to be Aligned and Harmonized with the 5 Global Goals
and New World Vision in each of the 193/306 UN Member States These
Sub-National, National and International Visions are Interrelated,
Interconnected, Interdependent and Interlinked. The 3 Visions could be
expressed in terms easily understood by the Ordinary Citizen in each North and
South Country as Agriculture and
Cooperatives Project that is Vehicle for achieving End Hunger, Malnutrition, Poverty; Climate Change and Environment;
Governance and Sustainability Dimensions of the SDGs.
The Masses of Ordinary
Citizens in all 193/306 UN Member States do not understand these Complex
Visions but they understand Agriculture. They need Massive Public Education and
Public Enlightenment to appreciate that Modernizing
and Mechanizing Agriculture within Fourth Agriculture Revolution2
and Fourth Industrial Revolution that Work for the World’s Poor is not
rocket science;
2.
http://www.oecd.org/agriculture/solving-the-food-crisis.htm OECD Interesting Points on 4th Agriculture
Revolution that Work
They also understand Cooperatives. They need Massive Public Education
and Public Enlightenment to appreciate that Original Cooperatives Principles adapted to meet contemporary social
enterprise and social economy organizations in each of the 193/306 UN
Member States of 21st Century is a necessary condition for Ending
Hunger, Malnutrition and Poverty in all 193/306 UN Member States by end 2030
target date.
EAG estimate is that US$ 700
Trillion would be required from all sources to fund achieving SDGs Pledge
Delivery in all 193/306 UN Member States in the 11 ½ years remaining to end
2030 target date. New Cooperatives
Movement in all 193/306 UN Member States have Central Role to Play in raising reasonable portion of this Fund
as well as ensuring its effective
Utilization of Results in each specific Community, Sub-Country and Country
location context.
This underlines need for Agriculture
and Cooperatives Project Designed and Delivered in all Communities, in all Local
Governments, in all States and Nationwide in all North and South Countries to
meaningfully address real and complex:-
Agriculture: Crops,
Livestock, Forestry, Fisheries and Aquaculture: Pre Harvest, Harvest and Post
Harvest
as well as
Cooperatives: Primary
Society; Secondary Union; Central Society including Cooperatives Agricultural
Bank, Cooperatives Agricultural Research Services Institute, Cooperatives
Research Services Institute and Cooperatives
Agriculture Productivity, Quality and Empowerment Capacity Building Institute
as One; problems on the ground as
applicable or appropriate all
Communities, in all Local Governments, in all States and Nationwide in all
North and South Countries location context.
Sub-national and National Goals at Country level and Regional and
Global Goals at International level, will not be met, unless individuals and
communities are informed, engaged and empowered to demand and participate in
change and in improving their own lives, in their own specific location
context.
National and International Stakeholders
cannot keep using Multiple Approaches to achieve the Sub-national
and National Goals at Country level and Regional and Global Goals at
International level, some of which are divergent and expect good
results.
Fundamental
issues of Inclusive Education: Education
for Sustainable Development; Education for Sustainable Production; Education
for Sustainable Consumption
and Education for Sustainable Citizenship
as well as Inclusive Communication: Communication for Sustainable Development;
Communication
for Sustainable Production; Communication for Sustainable Consumption and Communication for Sustainable Citizenship; Attitudinal and Behavioral Change
Communication; Political and Behavioral Change Communication; Economic and
Behavioral Change Communication; Social and Behavioral Change Communication;
Cultural and Behavioral Change Communication; Climate Change and Behavioral
Change Communication; Environmental and Behavioral Change Communication;
Communication for Behavioral Impact; Changing Attitude and Behavior at Scale
Communication as One that is within
Universal / One Worldwide Approach / Whole of Society Approach. It is Fail in
One Fai in All.
Inclusive Education and Inclusive Communication
engages and supports people to shift norms, change behaviors and amplify the
voices needed to meet humanity’s most pressing challenges.
Inclusive Education and Inclusive Communication
Individually and Jointly are critical to strengthening the agency of
ordinary people, transforming societies and assuring access to life-saving
information and support.
EAG Intervention Idea Implementation Update - Global
1. FT (Media
Organization) in Opinion3 by Mr. Martin Wolf highlighted some
Multiple Crisis facing UK today. We commended Mr. Wolf’s analysis in a 20 April
2019 feedback that led to multiple exchanges of views leading to Mr. Wolf in
his final submission, in the very productive dialogue, strongly recommended
that we move forward the constructive engagement by writing Letter to the FT
Editor, in which we spell out our innovative sustainable solutions. On 21 April
we reached out to FT Partnership Unit. On 26 April 2019 we sent reminder. We
are yet to get response from FT Partnership Unit. This is a puzzle.
The highlights of
exchange of views with Mr. Wolf are:-
a)
UK
is in Crises (He identified 6 Multiple Crises but there are more) and UK is the
Crisis (He did not spell this out but the UK Political Culture, Perfidious
Albion etc DNA present Huge Stumbling Block to UK achieving its Brexit Vision).
Also he did not set out Sustainable Solutions to his identified Multiple Crises
as Word Limits in Opinion Articles did not permit putting such comprehensive
details in the Public Domain.
b)
EU
is in Crises (He did not identify this reality. The EU has Multiple Crises
including Currency, Financial, Banking, Debts, Migration, Sovereignty, Trade
etc) and EU is the Crisis (He did not identify this reality but the EU
Political Culture, Bureaucracy and Rigidity etc DNA present Huge Stumbling
Block to EU achieving EU Project Vision in all EU Countries, as well as UK
achieving its Brexit Vision).
c)
Some
Top Journalists including Mr. Wolf; Top Academics including VC The University
of Buckingham; Senior Politicians have published Opinion Articles based on
Quality Analysis in UK Media, that essentially focus on problems (and blame).
The implication is that the Quality Analysis have little or no utility in the
great task of finding Innovative Sustainable Solutions to real and complex
Brexit and EU Project problems on the ground, as applicable or appropriate in
UK, Ireland and remaining 26 EU Countries specific location context.
d) Our Organization’s
spirited effort to constructively engage some of the authors in (2c) have been
largely rebuffed.
e)
Mr.
Wolf in agreeing to frank and blisteringly truthful exchange of ideas with our
Director General and going further to suggest we reach out to FT Authorities
demonstrate his genuine concern on urgent need to Professionally tackle Brexit
Challenges on the ground in the UK and EU. It also demonstrate that he
recognizes the urgent need for all relevant National and International
Stakeholders in UK Economy and EU Economy
to jointly take all necessary measures to avert looming ultimate
catastrophic consequences in UK, Ireland, rest of EU and rest of World, of
Brexit that end up as Force for Evil.
FT
Opinion Martin Wolf 18 April 2019
f) Without Brexit, EU Project and SDGs Pledge Delivery as One:
Political and Technical Solutions, all other Solutions – Economic, Financial,
Cooperatives, Communication, Cultural, Social, Security, Governance, Climate
Change, Environmental, Attitudinal Change, Religions etc are no issue or amount
to no issue. The implication is that without these Integrated Solutions finding
Solution to Brexit, EU Project and SDGs Pledge Delivery real and complex
problems on the ground in UK, EU and World will be Mirage with ultimate
Catastrophic Consequences for UK, Ireland, rest of EU and rest of World.
g) Without Correct Diagnosis, Correct Prescription, Correct Surgery
and Correct Recovery Management as Core Drivers of Alternative Brexit,
Original EU Project Vision and SDGs Pledge Delivery as One in UK, EU and World,
finding Innovative Sustainable Solutions to UK is in Crises
and UK is the Crisis Interrelated, Interlinked, Interconnected and
Interdependent with UK is in Crises and UK is
the Crisis will be Mirage with ultimate Catastrophic Consequences for UK,
Ireland, rest of EU and rest of World.
h) Top 1,000
Universities in the World (many of which are in UK and EU) have much to
contribute towards achieving delivery on Alternative Brexit, Original EU
Project Vision and SDGs Pledge Delivery as One in UK, EU and World.
i) There
are Bright Prospects of Success if Top UK National and Global Media could
decide to help Implement UK Rescue Mission and EU Rescue Mission that Work for
the Poor in UK, EU and World.
2.
JRF, UK
(Philanthropy Organization) in Paper4 by Ms Bernard sought Triple System Reforms to
help solve UK Food Poverty, Social Housing and Social Security problems. We
commended the Paper but noted there is need for JRF to do deeper analysis of
Food Poverty and Food Brexit in the UK and consider meaningfully supporting
ways and means of achieving Paradigm Shifts: from focus on problems and blame
to focus on solutions and opportunities; from not understanding the True Nature
of Hunger, Malnutrition and Poverty to genuinely understanding the True Nature
of Hunger, Malnutrition and Poverty; from Brexit as Force for Evil to Brexit as
Force for Good, from Business as Usual to Business Unusual, from Change for
Change Sake to Needed Change Sake and related Paradigm Shifts, as basis for
achieving increasing convergence between JRF Vision Intention and Reality
linked to Brexit Vision Intention and Reality and in ways that meaningfully
address: Ending Hunger, Malnutrition and Poverty in the UK; Brexit and EU
Project Discontent on UK Voters – Leave, Remain and Abstain sides and Brexit
and EU Project Discontent on Ireland Citizens and Citizens in remaining 26 EU
Countries sides, as well as effectively help achieve SDGs Pledge Delivery in
All North and South Countries in 11 ½ years remaining to end 2030 target date. JRF
is yet to respond to this message.
3. We commended ILO
COOP on its 100th Anniversary in a 30 April 2019 message including
update on the cooperatives aspect of our Work and its potential to help raise
reasonable portion of the US$ 700 Trillion required to fund SDGs Pledge
delivery Worldwide. We requested for Partnership. We are still awaiting ILO
COOP response.
JRF Opinion Helen Bernard 25 April 2019
4. GPEDC (Global
Multi Stakeholder Platform with UNDP and OECD as Joint Partnership Support
Team) FfD Forum Side Event “Making Development Co-operation More Effective: Country-Level Evidence
and Action to Accelerate Progress” was held on 17 April 2019. GPEDC language regarding this Event suggest GPEDC has
better understanding of what effective answer to SDGs Pledge Delivery in all
193/306 UN Member States by 2030 HOW Questions entails, yet GPEDC seem to be
avoiding or evading Partnership with EAG.
In a 24 April 2019 message to GPEDC we noted that
the Event was intended to focus on:-
a) Mobilizing Resources for AAAA and SDGs
from all Actors and making effective use of these Resources (as appropriate
or applicable in each specific Community, Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent,
Continent and Global location context);
b) Ensuring Strong Commitment to making
AAAA and SDGs Partnerships and Cooperation more effective and a Whole of
Society Effort (yet GPEDC avoid or evade supporting One Worldwide
Approach, Business Unusual Approach and Needed Change Approach therefore
Multiple Approaches many of which are divergent, Business as Usual Approach and
Change for Change Sake Approach remain);
c) Discussing HOW countries and development partners are making progress on
effective development co-operation and what actions are needed to improve
partnerships that deliver on Addis commitments, the 2030 Agenda, and the
SDGs (2030 Agenda and the SDGs are the same. What is intended may be
SDGs and COP21 – that is all 3 Global Goals agreed in 2015 – AAAA, SDGs and
COP21. There is need to include Agenda 21 Rio and Rio+20 and NIEO; New
International Economic Order; 1974 – that is 5 Global Goals: AAAA, SDGs, COP21,
Agenda 21 Rio and Rio+20 and NIEO);
d) Sharing with the FfD
community the latest, emerging country-level evidence on efforts to improve the quality, effectiveness and impact of development co-operation (GPEDC is yet
to make 2018 Monitoring Round Report and GPEDC Call for Evidence Report
2019 available to the Public);
e) Discussing emerging evidence from the
latest Global Partnership monitoring round
as a curtain raiser for the 2019 Senior Level Meeting (In the work
towards finding answer to HOW Questions, GPEDC is either part of the
problem or part of the solution);
f) Highlighting key issues
requiring political attention and action
to accelerate progress towards the achievement of the AAAA and the SDGs (add
remaining Global Goals - . COP21, Agenda 21 Rio and Rio+20 and NIEO).
Italics ours.
We expected that the 2018
Monitoring Round Report inclusive of
Global Call for Evidence Report 2019 would have
been released at the Event to Physical Participants and sent be email to all
on GPEDC Listserv. We are concerned that these 2 important documents are
yet to be posted on GPEDC website.
It is not
helpful that these 2 important documents - 2018 Monitoring Round Report and
Global Call for Evidence Report 2019 are yet to be made available to the
public.
We urged the
Team to genuinely appreciate that SDGs is in reality 5 Global Goals in One
Global Goal; that with just 11 ½ years remaining to end 2030 target date to
achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge, so much need to be done in so little time and
that should all or most of the fundamental issues raised in our submissions be
edited out of the 2 important documents, the 2 documents are Vision and Words
without Action, therefore FLUKE at best contributing little that is not
sustainable and at worst contributing nothing towards supporting all North and
South Countries to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in 11 ½ years remaining to
end 2030 target date.
If all or
most of the fundamental issues raised in our submissions have been edited out
of the 2 documents when they are released and if the 17 April 2019 Event
underline urgent need to meaningfully address these edited out issues, it is
our hope that the Team will take required remedial action and on time to avoid
looming catastrophic consequences of failure to achieve SDGs Pledge delivery in
all North and South Countries by end 2030 target date.
5. UNEMG promised to
release Global Consultation on UNEMG New Model Approach Version 2 by March
2019. This Report is yet to be released as at date.
We expect the UNEMG New Model Approach Version 2 when
it is released, given UNEMG written commendations of our submissions, would
include EAG 3PCM Approach as backbone.
Our submissions included list of 9 additional UNO Agencies including ILO that need to have their version of UNEMG New Model Approach
Version 2 up and running and without delay. The suggested 10 UNO Agencies
and UNO Groups are:-
a) UNEnMG – Environment Management Group Domiciled in
UNEP: with responsibility for Climate Change and Environmental Dimension of
National and Global Goals
b) UNDvMG – Development
Management Group Domiciled in UN FAO: with responsibility for Development,
Hunger, Malnutrition and Poverty Dimension of National and Global Goals
c)
UNEvMG – Evaluation Management Group Domiciled in
IEG-UNO (Independent Evaluation Group of UN Organization that is Evaluation
Offices in all Institutions or Entities in entire UN Organization Operating as
One): with responsibility for Monitoring and Evaluation Dimension of National
and Global Goals
d) UNRsMG – Resilience
Management Group Domiciled in UNDP: with responsibility for Resilience,
Mitigation and Adaptation having 9 indivisible Components – Agriculture; Health
– Plants, Animals, Human; Tourism; Water, Humanitarian, Energy/Electricity,
Infrastructure – Transport- Rail, Road, Water, Air; Finance – Banking and Non
Banking, Technology – Information, Internet, Computer, Telecom, Bio,
Management; Ecosystem and Biodiversity and Institutional and Systems Reform as
One Dimension of National and Global Goals
e) UNRfMG – Reform Management Group Domiciled in UNRP
(UN Reform Program that is UN Reform Office Upgraded to Full UN Program: with
responsibility for Institutional Reform and Process Re-engineering Dimension of
National and Global Goals
f) UNCmMG – Communication Management Group Domiciled in
UNDPI: with responsibility for Development
Communication, Attitudinal and Behavioural Change Dimension of National
and Global Goals
g) UNSvMG – Service Management Group Domiciled in UNDESA
DSDG: with responsibility for Public Service, Civil Service, Police
Service, Military Service, Paramilitary Service, Foreign Service, Legislative
Service, Judiciary Service Dimension of National and Global Goals
h) UNPdMG – Productivity
Management Group Domiciled in UN ILO: with responsibility for Productivity
and Empowerment Dimension of National and Global Goals
i) UNFnMG – Financial Management Group Domiciled in
UNDESA FSDO: with responsibility for Public Finance, Private Finance Social
Economy and Social Enterprise Finance and Grant Finance Dimension of National
and Global Goals
j) UNRgMG – Religion Management Group Domiciled in
UNESCO: with responsibility for Orthodox Religion, Traditional Religion and
Harmful Spirituality Dimension of National and Global Goals
It is a puzzle UNEMG is delaying release of this
important Report, yet UNEMG is fully aware that our World has 11 ½ years to
avert looming Climate Change Catastrophe.
The earlier UNEMG New Model Approach Version 2 with 3PCM backbone and complementary
New Model Approach Version 2 for each of the 9 additional UN Management Groups
are released, the greater the positive difference
these 10 UN Management Groups could make in the great task of getting all
193/306 UN Member States back On Track to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in
the 11 ½ years remaining to end 2030 target date.
6. UNDESA and UNDSDG
promise to release UN Partnerships
Report by July 2019. UNDESA sent written commendation of our submission to
UN Partnership Global Consultation.
UNDESA needs to consider leading the way in the Implementation of EAG Intervention Idea
including backbone MSP and Global and National MSPs, for other UNO Entities as
well as North Countries Governments and South Countries Governments to follow.
We urge UNDESA to help facilitate Mandates and to let
Charity start from Home by persuading UNDSDG, 9 remaining UNDESA Divisions
(amended as suggested in some of our submissions) and UNDESA itself leading the
way in giving EAG Mandate. This way UNDESA will have the Moral Right to
persuade other UNO Entities as well as North Countries Governments and South
Countries Governments to also give EAG Mandate as practical option in UNO
helping all 193/306 UN Member States get back On Track to achieve delivery on
SDGs Pledge in 11 ½ years remaining to end 2030 target date.
UK Multiple Crises:
Innovative Sustainable Solutions – The Way Forward?
Our
Study Finding is that the UK today
is in Multiple Crises – all 6 identified by Mr. Wolf and more and UK is the
Crisis – the UK itself UK Crown, UK Government, UK Parliament, UK Academics, UK
Foundations/Philanthropists and UK Media are by omission or commission knowingly or unknowingly blocking Innovative
Sustainable Solutions to all identified Multiple Crises including the
overarching Crisis on ground in the UK today.
This
is very sad. It underlines urgent need for all relevant UK
Authorities and EU Authorities to meaningfully address points being made by
real intentions of Brexit Voters: Leave, Remain and Abstain and also suggests
UK Authorities and EU Authorities allergy
to TRUTH need to be urgently cured
before it become cancer that destroy
UK, Ireland, rest of EU and rest of World.
It
is not only UK and EU that has Multiple
Crises with One Overarching Crisis, Ireland and remaining 26 EU Countries;
Nigeria and all remaining African Countries; China and all remaining Asian Countries;
US and all remaining Countries as well as AU and all remaining
Sub-Regional/Regional Political Groupings of Countries each face similar complex problems.
Should
Brexit be allowed by World Leaders to activate
Time Bomb of UK National Crisis that make worst UK National Crisis in
recent Centuries Child’s Play and EU Crises that destroy EU Project, these
would catalyze Global Depression that
make Global Depression of 1930s’ Child’s Play.
Brexit induced
National Crisis
in UK, Ireland, rest of EU and rest of World is Guarantee that all 193/306 UN Member States Off Track achieving SDGs Pledge delivery as at 13 of 60 Quarters of Implementation, would at 60 of 60 Quarters of Implementation fail to achieve delivery on SDGs
Pledge, with ultimate catastrophic
consequences for our fragile Planet
from 2030 onwards.
This
underlines urgent need for National
Leaders and World Leaders in UK, EU and Worldwide to urgently take all necessary measures to shift from Brexit as Force for
Evil to Brexit as Force for Good. As no One Knows when UK would race past irreversibility point and
activate the Time Bomb, One Day Delay
taking required remedial action, may
be One Day too late.
Rethinkings
It is clear
that Rethinking EU Project inclusive of Rethinking Capitalism, Rethinking
Democracy, Rethinking Elections, Rethinking Development, Rethinking Defence,
Rethinking Data, Rethinking Digitization, Rethinking Evaluation and other
Rethinking identified in our Papers, is necessary
condition for finding correct answer to Brexit root cause or primary cause problems on UK, Ireland, remaining 26
EU Countries as well as European Parliament, European Council, European Commission and remaining EU Institutions
sides.
Greta Thunberg
It will be recalled that the 16 year old activist
Greta Thunberg speaking on 16 April 2019 at European Parliament on saving our
Planet from Climate Change Catastrophe essentially noted that EU Leaders are
Long on Words and Short on Action and made Clarion Call on EU Leaders to remedy
this flaw before it’s too late for Europe and our World.
Alternative Brexit – The Only WIN – WIN
Option
In keeping silent on Alternative Brexit we
propose in our submissions, is this not further evidence that EU Leaders need
to take Greta’s Clarion Call very seriously and do the needful and on time, if UK, EU and World is/are to avoid
looming Brexit and EU Project Failure catastrophic consequences?
In keeping silent on Alternative Brexit,
have the European Parliament, European Commission and European Council not
demonstrated unwillingness to take genuine, purposeful, effective, efficient,
successful and sustainable political action jointly with relevant stakeholders
as appropriate and applicable in each specific Community, Sub-Country, Country,
Sub-Continent, Continent and Global location context driving sustainable
solutions to all identified real and complex Brexit, EU Project and SDGs Pledge
Delivery in All North and South Countries
by 2030 – 11 ½ years remaining?
In keeping silent on Alternative Brexit,
is Mr. Wolf’s opinion not further evidence that UK Leaders, UK Media and UK
Foundations/Philanthropists need to be helped if they are to help themselves to
avoid looming catastrophic consequences of the UK being once again the Sick Man
(Nation) of Europe? Is Ms Bernard’s Opinion not further evidence that JRF/UK Philanthropists
need to do more than merely writing Opinions and that JRF should pick up the
gauntlet and take action where others have avoided or evaded required action in
UK Enlightened Self Interest?
The lack of adequate and appropriate Brexit
as Force for Good; EU Project that Work; Country Sustainability Strategy and
SDGs in All North and South Countries adequate
political action is a Major problem
that UK Leaders, UK Media and UK Foundations/Philanthropists on one hand and EU
Leaders, EU Media and EU Foundations/Philanthropists on the other hand, need to
speedily solve, if Brexit is to be Force
for Good; EU Project is to succeed
and if UK, all 27 EU Countries and all remaining UN Member States are to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in just 11 ½ years remaining and in ways that
effectively End Hunger, Malnutrition and Poverty in all Communities in all
Countries.
We again urge UK Authorities – Government, Parliament, Media, Foundations/Philanthropy
and EU Authorities – Member States:
Government, Parliament, Media, Foundations/Philanthropy, EU Institutions to jointly recognize that deal or no deal
as final end to Brexit negotiations will not deliver sustainable solutions to
Brexit root cause or primary cause problems on UK and EU sides; that continuing
to prepare for No Deal rather than
effectively supporting Alternative Brexit will have ultimate catastrophic
consequences for UK, Ireland rest of EU and rest of World and that One Day delay implementing the
suggested Alternative Brexit may be One
Day too late to avoid looming catastrophic
consequences of Failed Brexit and Failed EU Project. This is because no one
knows when the UK could race past
irreversibility point as the UK and EU keeps accelerating on MADning (Mutually Assured Destruction) Road
to DOOM rather than shift and start accelerating on MAPing (Mutually Assured Prosperity) Road to BOOM.
As long as
UK Leaders, UK Citizens, EU Leaders and Citizens in Ireland and remaining 26 EU
Countries do not shift from Change for Change Sake and
Business as Usual Approach and shift
towards speedily adopting Needed Change and Business Unusual Approach to jointly finding Innovative Sustainable
Solutions to all identified real and
complex Food Brexit/Food Poverty; Brexit; EU Project; Country
Sustainability Strategy and SDGs - in Ireland and remaining 26 EU Countries and
UK root cause or primary cause problems on the ground; fully Implementing these Innovative Sustainable Solutions with effective Monitoring and Evaluation of
this Implementation using One Worldwide
Approach, the ultimate consequences will be catastrophic for all in UK, Ireland, rest of EU and Beyond – with Africa being very had hit
(for no fault of theirs) and this in turn worsening
Africans Illegal Migration to EU that worsen EU woes.
Alternative Brexit Vision, Original EU Project Vision and SDGs Pledge
Delivery Vision as One
All North and South Countries are Off
Track achieving delivery on SDGs Pledge by 2030. Brexit as Force for Evil will make already difficult task of getting all
193/306 UN Member States back On Track to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge by
2030 especially difficult. There are flaws and failures on UK, Ireland,
remaining 26 EU Countries and all EU Institutions sides that need to be urgently addressed. For example these
are a sample of points made in messages to European
Parliament and EU Commission that need to be addressed if Brexit is to be Force
for Good:-
1. It is flaw in
existing European Commission System that European Commission Public Inquiry
Point is not equipped to address
serious issues of Development Cooperation and Regional Integration Dimensions
to Brexit; EU Project; 5 Global Goals – AAAA, SDGs, COP21, Agenda21 – Rio and
Rio+20 and NIEO Innovative Sustainable Solutions as applicable in each specific
Community: in the UK; in Ireland; in 26 remaining EU Countries and in all EU
Partner Countries Worldwide, such as those raised in our submissions.
2. It is pertinent
to note that our submissions highlight Development
Cooperation and Regional Integration contemporary challenges facing
European Commission today in its work on Brexit, EU Project, SDGs Pledge
Delivery by 2030 in all EU Countries and suggest Innovative Sustainable
Solutions Moving Forward in the Common Interest, Common Future and Common
Destiny of UK, Ireland, remaining 26 EU Countries and all EU Partner Countries
Worldwide.
3. It is flaw in
existing European Council System that European Council Public Inquiry Point has
not bothered to respond to our March
2019 inquiry and is not equipped to
address serious issues of Political and
Attitudinal Change Dimensions to Brexit; EU Project; 5 Global Goals – AAAA,
SDGs, COP21, Agenda21 – Rio and Rio+20 and NIEO Innovative Sustainable Solutions as applicable in each specific
Community: in the UK; in Ireland; in 26 remaining EU Countries and in all EU
Partner Countries Worldwide, such as those raised in our submissions.
4. It is pertinent
to note that our submissions highlight Political
and Attitudinal Change contemporary challenges facing European Commission
today in its work on Brexit, EU Project, SDGs Pledge Delivery by 2030 in all EU
Countries and suggest Innovative
Sustainable Solutions Moving Forward in the Common Interest, Common Future and Common Destiny of UK, Ireland,
remaining 26 EU Countries and all EU Partner Countries Worldwide.
5. Media Report
confirms that the UK has resumed
preparations for No Deal Brexit. We assume the EU did not stop or has also resumed preparations for No Deal Brexit.
6. Training Needs Identification and Change Needs
Identification on the part of these
Major Groups are Master Keys for meaningfully addressing all fundamental issues
set out in our submissions:-
a)
Government Policy
Makers and Decision Makers
b) Government Managers and Supervisors
c)
Government Shop
Front and Back Room Staff
d) UN System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO Policy Makers and
Decision Makers
e)
UN System: UNO,
WBG, IMF, WTO Managers and Supervisors
f)
UN System: UNO,
WBG, IMF, WTO Shop Front and Back Room Staff
g) Sub-regional /
Regional / Global Political Groupings of Countries – All EU Institutions, OECD
etc Policy Makers and Decision Makers
h) Sub-regional / Regional / Global Political Groupings
of Countries – All EU Institutions, OECD etc Managers and Supervisors
i) Sub-regional / Regional
/ Global Political Groupings of Countries – All EU Institutions, OECD etc Shop
Front and Back Room Staff
j)
National /
Sub-Regional / Regional / Global Philanthropy Organizations
k)
Service
Regulators – Education, Health, Agriculture etc
l)
Service Providers
– Education, Health, Agriculture etc
m) Service Users – Education, Health, Agriculture etc
n) Individuals – Children, Youth, Women, Men, Elders
7. Should the UK and
EU Authorities wait till No Deal become
the last Option before taking positive decision on our submissions, this
would be medicine after death. The
time to take positive decision on
our submissions is NOW. One Day Delay may be One Day too late.
It is appalling that Ireland, the EU Country whose
National Economy umbilical cord is tied to the UK National Economy and who
stand to lose the most from Brexit as Force for Evil – probably more than the
UK itself, has been dancing around
Alternative Brexit in the wishful
thinking that EU Solidarity will
save Ireland from Brexit catastrophe as UK take decision in Irish Interest.
We urge World Leaders recognize that the ultimate consequences of all relevant
UK Institutions, all relevant Irish Institutions, all relevant Institutions in
remaining 26 EU Countries and all relevant EU Institutions Authorities: dancing around issues / looking on /
sitting by / powerless – Brexit responses hindering all UK Institutions and
all EU Institutions doing the right
thing and on time will assure EU Project failure and this will be catastrophic for Europe and our World.
21st
Century Leadership Required in All North and
South Countries and Fast
The 20th Century
Leadership Models for organizational design, human resource, and professional
development processes are not adequate to effectively address these fundamental
issues and in ways that are Fit for
purpose, Fit for 21st Century, Innovative and
Creative and
that effectively help all 193/306 UN Member States get back On Track to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in 11 ½ ears
remaining to end 2030 target date.
This underlines urgent need
for heads of UN Agencies; Government Agencies in Public Sector, Organizations
in Private Sector on both North and South Countries sides and Academic
Institutions on both North and South Countries sides to consider shaping and developing their corporate
culture to include new leadership
initiatives aimed at ensuring that stable, secure, collaborative and, most
importantly, authentic relationships
exist between managers, team members and staff in their internal publics and corporation- managers, team members and staff;
regulators (where applicable), suppliers and customers in their external publics as these UN Agencies,
Government Agencies and Private Organizations work jointly (within respective Mission and Vision) on the Implementation and Evaluation of Food, Nutrition, Agriculture and
Security Vision Dimensions Linked to Political, Cultural, Economic, Financial,
Social, Security, Peace, Religious, Climate Change, Environmental, Procurement
and Governance etc Dimensions of
Transformation Agenda – AAAA, SDG, COP21, Agenda 21 and NIEO for
Delivery on SDG Pledge by end 2030 target date, for which they have
responsibility.
These New Leadership Initiatives
will involve leaders meaningfully
projecting high levels of steely confidence, strength and toughness at all
costs. It is pertinent to note that research and experience actually show that
when humans, and leaders alike, are authentic and transparent in their communications about how they genuinely
feel, and remain consistently available
to those around them, that virtually
unbreakable bonds of trust can develop through the vulnerability and
openness shared.
This underlines urgent need for Inclusive
Communication and Inclusive Education as one being building blocks of trust and
respect at levels required for government agencies in public sector, UN
System agencies and organizations in private sector to thrive in the chaos of the 21st Century.
To govern
effectively in each of the 193/306 UN Member States and in ways that
achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in All North and South Countries by end 2030
target date – just 11 ½ years remaining, is to effectively communicate and educate.
Inclusive
Communication and Inclusive Education are not an option in the work to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in all
193/306 UN Member States. In both North and South Countries Entities, as well
as in all UN System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO Entities these are constant obligations. Each is a two-way process between the governed
and the government in each specific community,
sub-country, country, sub-continent, continent and global location context.
Universities Global Goals Project
In our Model Top 1,000 Universities in the World
(many of which are in UK and EU) have much to contribute towards achieving
delivery on UK Food Brexit/Food Poverty, Alternative Brexit, Original EU Project
Vision and SDGs Pledge Delivery as One in UK, EU and World Innovative
Sustainable Solutions as applicable or appropriate in each specific Community,
Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent and Global location context.
Although many UK Universities are among Top 10, Top 100
and Top 1,000 Universities in the World, it is appalling that Leaders of
some of these UK and EU Top Universities that we sought to engage on the
Innovative Sustainable Solutions to UK/EU is in Crises and UK/EU is the Crisis
real and complex problems on the ground in the UK/EU have been avoiding or
evading joining our Organization to meaningfully address these complex issues
in UK/EU Enlightened Self Interest. They
prefer to look on while UK/EU keeps accelerating on MADning Road to DOOM.
This appalling reality should be of genuine
concern to UK, EU and World Leaders. We invite UK, EU and World to join us
in ensuring UK/EU Top Universities stop focusing on Problem and Blame and start focusing on Alternative Brexit Solutions
and Opportunities as well as in ensuring that Top 1,000 Universities in the
World start focusing on SDGs Pledge Delivery in all 193/306 UN Member States in
11 ½ years remaining to end 2030 target date Innovative Sustainable Solutions.
Way Forward
We have consistently submitted that Finding Correct Answer to SDG Pledge How
Questions, Fully Implementing these
Answers with effective Monitoring and
Evaluation of this Implementation Demands:-
1. Comprehensive
or Holistic Approach that is All Inclusive, All Embracing and Ambitious Goals
Framework, Means Framework and Effectiveness Framework as One;
2. Operationnalizing (1) in Practice would achieve Best Results
within Overarching Quality, Productivity
and Empowerment Improvement Program that is a Re-Engineering Program or
Reform Program including Agriculture and
Cooperatives Project that effectively meet End Hunger, Malnutrition and Poverty; Climate Change, Environment and
Governance Change Needs as applicable in each specific Community,
Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent and Global location context.
3. Operationnalizing (2) in Practice would achieve Best Results if
the Organization / Government / UN System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO (ITO) Entity Highest Political Authority Fully Support
the Re-Engineering Program or Reform
Program and all its Projects
4. Operationnalizing (3) in Practice would achieve Best Results if
the Organization / Government / UN System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO (ITO) Entity
Internal and External Publics are guided
by Community to Global External Coordinating Consultants with Minimum
Certain Levels of Hard Competencies:
Learning and Skills and Soft
Competencies: Character, Courage, Cultural, Discipline, Mindset and
Leadership as One Support Framework.
We have further submitted that there is a Triangular Relationship between the 3
Reports on 3 Basic SDGs Pledge Delivery by 2030 Issues, expected to be
released soon: UNEMG One Worldwide /
Universal Approach; GPEDC Evidence Based Innovative Sustainable Solutions and
UNDESA/UNDSDG Multi Stakeholders Partnerships / Platforms, MSPs Support. The 3 Reports are Interrelated, Interconnected, Interdependent
and Interlinked and that it is Fail in
Implementing One SDGs Pledge Delivery by 2030 Basic Issue Report, Fail in
Implementing the remaining 2 SDGs Pledge Delivery by 2030 Basic Issues Reports.
Therefore: the MSPs Support Report Conclusions and Recommendations need to support MSPs Backbone MSP that effectively connect each MSP in each Community, in
each Country, in each Continent and
Globally with the UNO Headquarters New York, WBG and IMF Headquarters
Washington and WTO (ITO) Headquarters regardless of whether the MSP is focused
on single target in single SDG Goal in single Community in single Country –
Smallest MSP or focused on all 169 Targets of all 17 Goals of the SDGs in all
Communities, in all Countries in all Continents and Globally – Biggest MSP.
Without this Backbone MSP fundamental issues of Policy, Program, Project
Interventions, 3PIs and 3PIs Training as
One: Coherence, Coordination, Collaboration, Cooperation and Commitment for
Sustainable Development – 3PIs/3PIsTaO -
5CSD as applicable in each specific Community, Sub-Country, Country,
Sub-Continent, Continent and Global location context cannot be effectively
addressed either within single target in single SDG Goal in single Community in
single Country or all 169 Targets of all 17 Goals of the SDGs in all
Communities, in all Countries in all Continents and Globally or anywhere in
between.
The New Model Approach, NMA Version 2 Report Conclusions and
Recommendations needs to distinguish between One Cap Fit All that is undesirable and unhelpful and One Worldwide Common, Systemic and Shared
Approach; between Legally Binding Agreement on Single Multi Stakeholder
Approach and Voluntary Option Agreement wherein different Stakeholders use
different Approaches, some or many of which are divergent. It also needs to
provide for the identified UNEMG NMA Version 2, 9 Complimentary Approaches of
the 9 UN Groups/Agencies.
The Evidence Based Innovative Sustainable
Solutions Report Conclusions and Recommendations need to demonstrate clearly that without speedily adopting One
Worldwide/Universal Approach as well as supporting Backbone MSP that is Politically relevant in each specific
Community, Sub-Country, Country, Sub-Continent, Continent and Global location
context 193/306 UN Member States will be unable
to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in less than 12 years remaining to end
2030 target date.
It is against this background
that we suggest as way forward, Action Kick Starting the 3 Step Action begin by
these UNDESA Divisions -UNDSDG, OISCSD, DPIDG, DISD Partnering with our
Organization on EAG Intervention Ideas to Jointly Make Call for Expression of Interest in MSPs for SDGs Sustainable Solutions
Pilot Program and Scale Up Program Invitation to:-
1.
Other UNO Entities and other UN System Entities
2.
193/306 UN Member States Governments: Executive, Legislature,
Judiciary at all levels.
We urge National and World
Leaders to note that Kick Starting the 3 Step Action is not exclusive to UNDESA Divisions. Global Political Groupings of
Countries, e.g. GPEDC, OECD and or any Regional/Continental Political Grouping
of Countries, e.g. ACBF/MfDR/AfCOP; Coalition of Powerful North and South
Countries and Coalition of Influential North and South Countries Universities,
who are willing and able to Partner with our Organization on EAG Intervention
Ideas, could also Kick Start the 3 Step Action.
Conclusion
As 2nd Quarter 2019 Year 4 of Implementation race to
end, it is our hope that the UNEMG New Model Approach Version 2 Report 2019 and
GPEDC Evidence Based Innovative Sustainable Solutions Report 2019 and
UNDESA/UNDSDG New Partnership Support Strategy Interim Report 2019 are released
without further delay; that UNDESA DSDG and remaining 9 Divisions and Powerful
North and South Countries effectively lead the way in achieving delivery on
SDGs Pledge in the 11 ½ years remaining to end 2030 target date, as practical option
in getting all 193/306 UN Member States back On Track to achieve delivery on
SDGs Pledge by end 2030 target date.
We urge UNDESA and its 10 Divisions; UN
Environment and UNEP; FAO; UNDP; WHO, UNESCO; ILO COOP
and other ILO Entities as well as other UNO Entities;
ECOSOC and its Subsidiary Bodies; other UN
System: WBG, IMF, WTO (ITO) Entities; Global/ Continental Political Groupings; Coalition of UN Member States – North and South Countries
and Coalition of Universities - North and South Countries, to genuinely appreciate that they
individually and jointly need to face
new direction and adopt new priorities, if entire UN System: UNO, WBG, IMF,
WTO (ITO) are to be effectively Re-engineered
to better support all 193/306 UN Member States to get back On Track to achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge in less than 12
years remaining to end 2030 target date; and that the Institutional Architecture
for the required re-engineering is best designed and delivered within the type of Analysis;
Pilot Program and Scale Up Program and Feeding Back Lessons Learned into Pilot
Program and Scale Up Program as One Universal Framework we have proposed.
We urge the
National Leaders and World Leaders to genuinely appreciate that our Fragile Planet is at Risk of Peril, if
urgent Remedial Action is not taken on time.
The Ball is now in the Court of National
Leaders and World Leaders – Will they
Play or Will they Keep Looking On as the World accelerate on MADning (Mutually Assured Destruction) Road
to DOOM or will they DO the NEEDFUL
and HELP all 193/306 UN Member States to speedily return to 2014 Cross Road
and start accelerating on MAPing
(Mutually Assured Prosperity) Road to BOOM?
It is our hope that
opportunity for bright prospects of success
would not be lost. To avoid this answer
to SDGs Pledge Delivery HOW Questions and related How Questions need to be
found within the 3 Step: Analysis; Pilot Program and Scale Up Program and
Feeding Back Lessons Learned into Pilot Program and Scale Up Program as One
Universal Framework. One Day Delay may be One Day too late.
We invite UNO Entities, Powerful North
Countries Governments, Powerful South Countries Governments and Top
Universities in the World, Influential Philanthropy Organizations and
Influential Global Media Organizations genuinely
interested in achieving delivery on SDGs Pledge in 11 ½ years remaining to
end 2030 target date to Partner with
our Organization on Implementation of EAG
Intervention Idea. Interested Governments,
Universities, Philanthropy Organizations and Media Organization to please send
us email on the topic “MSPs for SDGs
Sustainable Solutions Pilot Program and Scale Up Program”.
Contact:
Director General
Economic Alliance
Group
(Global Integrated
Innovative Sustainable Solutions Provider)
Affiliate Members:
International Society for Poverty Elimination
(Global Social
Development Innovation Organization);
ER and Associates
Limited
(National and
International Development Cooperation Consultants)
New End Hunger,
Malnutrition and Poverty, NEHMAP Initiative
(Global Social
Economy and Social Enterprise Organization) etc
M: +234-8162469805
Website: www.nehmapglobal.org
