ISPE EAG
INTERATIONAL
SOCIETY FOR POVERTY ELIMINATION ECONOMIC
ALLIANCE GROUP
Focused Points for
ING Meeting Organizers and Participants Consideration and Appropriate ACTION –
Part 3
Summary
We at NEHAP / ISPE / EAG commend all
on UN Member States, UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides working
towards Design and Delivery of Global Goals – revised AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome
and Agenda 21; Aligned and Harmonized with revised National Development Plans,
NDPs that can achieve Vision Ambitions by 2030. Giant Strides have been made
but much more remains to be done. The starting point is recognition by
Governments, Stakeholders and UN Family Organization that What questions have
been over-answered and that How questions need to be more Professionally
tackled and in ways that bring Whole of World Thinking to Bear towards the
Sustainable Solutions to Whole of World problems. To achieve this IGN Meetings
need to better address the following Focused Points set out in this Supporting
Papers Series. In Part 3:-
1.
Focus on correct answers to How To(s)
There is a
need for Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member States (over 300), UN
System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides to recognize that they have agreed
on the “what” in regard to partnership and share common interests and goals,
yet the details on “how” still need to be developed, that many UN Events
scheduled specifically to find correct answers to these “how” questions end up
finding answer to “what” questions. To achieve this there has to be a Focus on
correct answers to How To(s) and in ways that help achieve increasing
convergence between Theory and Practice and Global / National Vision Intention
and Reality.
2.
Focus on Understanding
There is a need for Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member
States (over 300), UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides to recognize
that: you can’t defeat real enemy you don’t understand; you can’t solve root
problems you don’t understand and you can’t answer big questions you don’t understand.
To have these required levels of understanding, Stakeholders on UN Member
States (over 300), UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides need to
consider facing new direction and adopting new priorities and on time.
In Part 1, we
discussed:-
- Revolution
2030
Design and Delivery of Global Goals and National Goals
– revised AAAA, SDG, COP 21 Outcome, Agenda 21 etc aligned and harmonized with
NDPs’ that will be successful on sustainable basis greatly depends on Design
and Delivery of Revolution 2030, a set of Interlinked, Interconnected and
Interdependent Primary Revolutions: Water, Agriculture, Enterprise, Government,
Applied Research, Attitudinal and Behavioral Change, Data, Digital and other
Primary Revolution as Health, Education, Nutrition, Justice, Anti Corruption,
Security, Peace and other Secondary Revolution Driving all Global Goals Aligned
and Harmonized to NDPs in each UN Member State.
- MSP
2030
Design and Delivery of Revolution 2030 that will be
successful on sustainable basis greatly depends on Design and Delivery of a
Master Multi Stakeholder Platform, MSP for all Global Goals Aligned and
Harmonized to NDPs in each UN Member State and MSPs’ for each Action Agenda
Item within revised AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, HLPF Retreat Outcome, ECOSOC
Retreat Outcome etc Aligned and Harmonized with NDPs’ in each UN Member State.
In Part 2, we
discussed:-
1.
Capacity 2030
Design and
Delivery of Revolution 2030 and Solidarity 2030 that will be successful on
sustainable basis greatly depends of finding correct answers to How questions,
fully implement these answers and effectively monitor and evaluate this
implementation greatly depends on Design and Delivery of Capacity 2030 to
address Individual Capacity issues of Demand and Supply of Hard Competences:
Learning and Skills and Soft Competencies: Character, Courage and Mindset;
Institution Capacity Issues and Society Capacity Issues from Village to Global
levels.
2.
Revolution 2030
Design and
Delivery of Revolution 2030, Solidarity 2030 and Capacity 2030 that will be
successful on sustainable basis greatly depends on Design and Delivery of
Solidarity 2030; Village to Global Solidarity Mechanism that help bridge Gap
between Political Leadership we need and Political Leadership we have from
Village to Global levels.
Introduction
This Part 3 complements points made in Part 1 and Part
2 in this IGN Meetings Supporting Papers Series. If practical answers are to be
found to How questions and in ways that help achieve all Goals and Targets in
revised AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, ECOSOC Retreat Outcome, UN Retreat
on MSP Outcome, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc aligned and harmonized with National
Development Plans, NDPs’ in each UN Member State, Policy Makers and Decision
Makers on UN Member States, UN System and MGoS sides need to take ownership of
ideas and suggestions harvested from Global Consultations and RUN with them in
the Common Interest and Common Future of all Humanity, particularly the over 2
Billion Poor in both Developed and Developed Countries that they are serving.
The Argument
We observe that Policy Makers, Decision
Makers, Managers and Officers are working HARDer doing the same old things in
the same old ways and wondering why they are not getting new Results.
Our Study finding is that real and complex
National and International Development Cooperation problems on the ground from
Village to Global levels can be especially difficult but not impossible to
solve on successful and sustainable basis; that there is more than enough
resources – Influence, Technology, Innovation, Science, Arts, Manpower, Money,
Land, Water and Spiritual to solve Political & Cultural; Economic &
Financial; Social & Environmental; Religious & Moral; Peace &
Security problems on the ground in each specific location – Village to Global
in each of the over 300 UN Member States in our World today.
Our argument is that should Policy Makers,
Decision Makers, Managers and Officers on UN Member States (over 300), UN
System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides START working SMARTer doing new
things in new ways, the much expected new Results will be obtained, even if
many Stakeholders have to DO more with same. However, should Stakeholders
continue with Business as Usual, the ultimate consequences could be
catastrophic for all Citizens in each Country in our fragile planet.
Urgent Need
for Review
Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member
States (over 300), UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS parrot Business
Unusual and Change but practice Business and Usual and Anti Change. This is a
major reason why UN Events set up specifically to find answers to “how”
questions which is about “DOING” always end up finding answers to “what”
questions which is about “SAYING”.
There are many reasons for this unfortunate state
of affairs, including Competence, Attitudinal and Behavioural etc. Should
Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member States (over 300), UN System
including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides genuinely desire to achieve Global Goals –
revised AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 Aligned and Harmonized to National
Development Plans in each of the over 300 UN Member States and on schedule
dates, there is urgent need to review existing structure of ING Meetings,
Global Consultations and National Consultation to better support discussing and
establishing all necessary negotiations and arrangements for achieving
increasing convergence between National / Global Vision Intention and Reality
and on schedule dates.
One Nationwide / Worldwide
Approach
Answers to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, Data
Revolution, Synthesis Report where questions (including what and why questions)
and How questions at Sub-national, National, Sub-regional, Regional and Global
levels need to be found through:-
1.
Orientation Workshops
2.
Management Surveys
3.
Financial Surveys
4.
Engineering Surveys
5.
Desk Analysis of Reports – Conference and Study
for Headquarters Management and each Strategic Business Unit in each UN
Member State, UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS Entity, processed into
Community, Country, Regional and Global Master Plans with ACTION setting out
Priorities, Direction, Sequence and Pace of Action Agenda Items in revised
AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, ECOSOC Retreat Outcome, UN Retreat on MSP
Outcome, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc aligned and harmonized with NDPs’ required to
achieve National and Global Goals and Targets in all its ramifications as
specific to each Constituency at Local, Sub-national, National, Sub-regional,
Regional and Global levels:-
1.
Planning Side – Research, Planning and Data
2.
Implementation Side – Implementation
3.
Evaluation Side – Monitoring, Evaluation and Assessment
4.
Learning Side – Learning and Results
5. Accountability Side – Transparency, Accountability and Citizen and
Stakeholder Participation.
within One Nationwide / Worldwide Approach to Sustainable National and
International Development Cooperation.
Front End / Back End
Where the above Workshops and Surveys present Front End of Reforms, the
following Initiatives will be the Back End and where these Initiatives present
Front End the Workshops and Surveys will be Back End:-
1.
One Nationwide / Worldwide Approach with Local Context
2.
Consultative Research Management
3.
Development Research Management
4.
Correct Diagnosis, Prescription, Surgery and Recovery Management
5. Policy, Program, Project Intervention and Policy, Program, Project
Intervention Training as One
6.
Re-establish existing Institutions / Ventures
7.
Establish new Institutions / Ventures
8. Communication for UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat Outcome, HLPF
Retreat Outcome, SDG, AAAA, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, Synthesis Report etc
Management
9.
Country Led Evaluation System Management
10.
Standards Management
11.
Sanctions Management
12.
Celebration Management
One Worldwide Approach is not One Cap fits All; but a way of getting
Village to Global Stakeholders to stop working in “silos” and start working in
“teams”; to stop using “multiple approaches” some of which are divergent and
start using “generic approach” adapted to meet unique and specific need of
particular location or circumstance. One Worldwide Approach that would be
adopted by Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member States (over 300), UN
System including WBG and IMF and MGoS will be a Known Approach with clear
Principles, Instruments corresponding to each Principle, Practices and
Database. The only such Worldwide Common and Systemic Approach / One Worldwide
Approach available in our World today, that meets criteria for One Worldwide
Approach Recommended in SG Synthesis Report December 2014 is 3PCM (Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management
Approach to Benefits Focused National and International Development
Cooperation). Please let us know if you are aware of any other One Worldwide
Approach that meet this Standard.
Clear
Statements
1.
NEHAP/ ISPE
/ EAG have no power or intention to force any individual, institution or
government to accept its international development cooperation solutions.
2. No one
individual, institution or government anywhere in our world today has all the
answers to all of UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat Outcome, HLPF Retreat
Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, etc How questions
3.
Correct
answer to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21
Outcome, Agenda 21, HLPF Retreat Outcome, UN Retreat on MSP Outcome etc How
questions cannot be found in Desk Work - conferences, consultations and
research driven by talking and thinking.
4.
Correct
answer to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, UN Retreat on MSP
Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc How
questions can only be found in Desk Work - conferences, consultations and
research and Field Work – theory, practice and partnership driven by action and
accomplishment that is inclusive and effectively connect each community in each
of 193 Member States to UN Headquarters New York.
5. Current
AAAA, SDG, COP21 processes each has flaws and failures arising from technical
errors and mistaken priorities from village to global levels that need to be
immediately corrected.
6. Current
Attitude and Behaviour of most Village to Global Stakeholders on both State
Actors and Non State Actors fall below minimum certain levels required to find
correct answer to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG,
COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc How questions, full
implement these answers with effective monitoring and evaluation of this
implementation in ways that achieve Global Goals by 2030 target date.
7. Current
effort at answering UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA, SDG,
COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc How questions is at least
one year behind. Renewed effort is required if lost ground is to be covered and
if each community in each of 193 Member States is to accelerate on path to
achieving Global Goals by 2030 Target date.
8. Each
day Decision Makers in each UN Family Organization Entity, 193 Member States
and concerned Non State Actors sides delay or deny adopting or adapting
existing sound answers to UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, AAAA,
SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21, HLPF Retreat Outcome, UN Retreat on MSP Outcome
etc How questions is one day too long. Allowed to continue, the ultimate
consequences for our fragile planet could be catastrophic.
Integrated Architecture – Village
to Global
There is a need for Integrated Architecture Village to
Global that includes:-
1. Inclusive MSP: Master MSP and MSPs within –
Global Goals, National Goals, Planning and Implementation, Follow Up and
Review, Access to Justice, Peace and Security, Corruption, Counter Terrorism
and Counter Insurgence, Cooperatives, Finance for Development, Technology for
Development, Development Research and 17 SDGs’.
2.
Inclusive P4CSD: Policy Collaboration, Cooperation,
Coordination and Cohesion for Sustainable Development
3. Inclusive EAT4SD: Education and Training for
Sustainable Development – 5 Linkages: EAT4SD Theoretical and Practical
Instruction; EAT4SD and Industry; EAT4SD at Different Levels – Primary,
Secondary, Tertiary, Vocational, Professional; EAT4SD at different Types of
Institutions – Government, Private, NGO, Parochial, other’ EAT4SD and Extension
– Government, Private, Pluralistic.
4. Inclusive CAB4SD: Capacity Building for Sustainable
Development – 3 Levels: Individual –
Hard Competences: Learning and Skills and Soft Competences: Character, Courage
and Mindset; Institution – Pro Poor
Institution Reform Processes and Pro Poor Economic Growth Processes that
Support Individuals practicing their Hard and Soft Competences in their Day to
Day work and in ways that help achieve Corporate Goals and Vision and Society – Political & Cultural,
Economic & Financial, Social & Environmental, Religious & Moral,
Peace & Security Space for Institutions to Thrive on Chaos.
5. 3PI and 3PI Training as One: Policy, Program, Project Intervention,
3PI and 3PI Training as One in each Action Agenda Item in AAAA, SDG, COP21
Outcome, Agenda 21 Aligned and Harmonized to National development Plans in over
300 UN Member States, UN System including WBG and IMF and MGoS sides.
6.
Integrated Master Plans: Village to Global
7.
Internal and External Consultants
Support System: Village to
Global
8.
Correct Diagnosis, Prescription,
Surgery and Recovery Management System: Village to Global
9. One Worldwide Approach to (1) – (8).
Acid Test of Credibility
The acid test of credibility of SDG, AAAA, Agenda 21,
COP21 etc is how each delivers:-
1.
Better Domestic and International Trade in each of 193 Member
States.
2.
Better Financing – Equity, Loan and Grant for all particularly
the Poor
3.
Better War on Corruption and Terrorism and
4.
Better Environmental Sustainability.
New Thinking, New Ideas, New Ways
of Doing Things etc
The only way World Leaders can deliver on their promise
during the adoption of SDG is to improve Cohesion, Coordination, Collaboration,
Cooperation, Solidarity and Accountability in the design and delivery of mutual
support mechanism that help each of the 193 Member States to pass this acid
test of credibility of the SDGs.
To achieve this, the 193 (over 300) Member States
jointly and severally must demonstrate and be seen to demonstrate:-
1. Willingness to accept new ideas, new thinking,
new ways of doing things
2. Willingness to establish new coordination, new
collaboration, new cooperation, new solidarity, new accountability and new
partnership
3. Readiness to accept past flaws, past
failures, past drawbacks, past shortcomings and past hindrances
4. Readiness to build bridge between lessons
learning and lessons forgetting, create learning organization and create
learning society
5. Readiness to create Demand for Planning –
Research, Planning, Data as basis for creating Supply for Planning – Research,
Planning, Data
6. Readiness to create Demand for
Implementation as basis for creating supply for Implementation
7.
Readiness to create Demand for Evaluation –
Monitoring, Evaluation, Assessment as basis for creating Supply for Evaluation
– Monitoring, Evaluation, Assessment
8. Readiness to create Demand for
Accountability – Transparency, Accountability, Citizen / Stakeholder
Participation as basis for creating Supply for Accountability – Transparency,
Accountability, Citizen / Stakeholder Participation
9. Readiness to create Demand for Learning –
Learning and Result as basis for creating Supply for Learning – Learning and
Result
10. Readiness to accept One Nationwide / Region wide / Worldwide 3PCM –
Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management Approach and Methodology to
Sustainable Benefits focused National and International Development Cooperation
Policy, Program, Project Intervention, 3PI and 3PI Training as One in each
Action Agenda Item in each of the 17 SDGs applicable to specific context –
Village to Global in each of the 193 (over 300) Member States
Working Together To Benefit Together
][[[[[[[[]]]]]]
To help ensure World Leaders deliver on promise to
achieve SDGs’ by 2030, we suggest relevant UN and Non UN authorities undertake
critical review of this and earlier Papers, Policy Briefings and Articles.
Should its assessment confirm that indeed the Papers, Policy Briefings and
articles have many good ideas and pertinent suggestions, which adopted by UNGA,
HLPF, ECOSOC, UN Security Council, 193 Member States Governments and Partners –
Village to Global can help achieve increasing convergence between AAAA and SDG
Vision and Words with Action Intention and Reality in each Community in each
Local Government in each of 193 Member States, we suggest these UN and Non UN
authorities consider taking the following specific action steps:-
1. Endorse the Papers, Policy Briefings and Articles and request UNDESA
or UNNGLS to circulate the endorsed Papers, Policy Briefings and articles to
all World Leaders, 193 (over 300) Member States and other AAAA and SDG
Stakeholders.
2.
Underline need for Integrated Sustainable Solutions – Political
Solutions, Cultural Solutions, Economic Solutions, Financial Solutions, Social
Solutions, Environment Solutions, Peace Solutions, Security Solutions,
Religious Solutions and Moral Solutions; to Design and Delivery of each Action
Agenda Item in AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, HLPF Retreat Outcome etc
applicable to specific Village to Global location context.
3. Urge all World Leaders, 193 (over 300) member States and other
AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document etc Stakeholders to recognize that Political
Solutions is Master Key to unlocking remaining 9 Integrated Sustainable
Solutions.
4. Urge UNGA, HLPF, ECOSOC, UN Security Council to each pass resolution calling on each of the
193 (over 300) Member States to adopt recommendations in the Papers, Policy
Briefings and Articles and go further to establish immediately National
Integrated Economic Reform Program, NIEReP for the implementation and evaluation
of domesticated AAAA, SDG and COP21 Outcome Document etc Vision and Words with
Action, aligned with National Development Plan through National Reform Bureau
working with Reform Implementation Unit in each Ministry, Department and Agency
in each of the 193 (over 300) Member States, whose activities are coordinated
by Steering Committee on Reform and National Council on Reform within
complimentary Sub-national, National, Sub-regional, Regional and Global Master Multi
Stakeholder Partnership Platforms.
If SDG, AAAA, COP21 Outcome Document,
HLPF Retreat Outcome Document etc Vision Ambitions are to be achieved and on
schedule date, Village to Global Stakeholders need to Work Together to Benefit
Together.
2nd Global Consultation on SG
Report on Follow Up and Review
The PGA has
requested a second Global Consultation on SG Report on Follow Up and Review to
fill gaps in the Report. It will be recalled that this SG Report intended to
help answer How question but ended up answering What questions. Our
Organization is to the best of our knowledge the only Organization that openly
raised its Voice to draw attention to the fact that this SG Report answered
What questions and not How questions. It is our hope that this time the revised
SG Report will actually answer How questions. Can this be done without
addressing all fundamental issues raised in this and other Papers released by
our Organization?
The UN
Retreat on MSP Outcome Document identifies the need for UN Member States, UN
System including WBG and IMF to answer How questions but did not make
recommendations as to ways and means of moving forward in this regard. Can MSP
How questions be answered without this being integral part of answer to revised
AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome, Agenda 21 Aligned and Harmonized to National
Development Plans in over 300 UN Member States How questions? Again can these
be done without addressing all fundamental issues raised in this and other
Papers released by our Organization?
MOVING FORWARD
Do World Leaders, UNDESA, EOSG, UNGA, ECOSOC, HLPF and
Partners recognize that correct answer to all AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome
Document, ECOSOC Retreat Outcome, HLPF Retreat Outcome Document, Agenda 21, FAO
Conference on Hunger and Poverty Action Plan etc How questions lie in the
DOING? That without immediately:-
1. Appointing Reform Adviser and Global Coordinating Consultant on
AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, HLPF Retreat Outcome Document etc Policy
Coherence, Coordination, Collaboration and Cooperation for Sustainable
Development, P4CSD to UNGA, ECOSOC, UN Security Council and HLPF and Partners
2.
Selecting One Worldwide Approach without further delay
3. Establishing Mater Multi Stakeholder Platform, MSP and MSPs for
each Action Agenda item Village to Global, VtG
4. Establishing Multidisciplinary Professionals Community of Practice
on Poverty Elimination and Environmental Sustainability as VtG Platform for all
relevant existing and new Disciplines
5. Addressing issues of Trust, Silos, Honesty, Thinking,
Solidarity, Attitude, Behaviour, Communication etc VtG
6. Connecting each Community in each Local Government in each of the
193 (over 300) Member States to UN Headquarters New York
7. Establishing VtG Mechanism for Correct Diagnosis, Prescription,
Surgery and Recovery Management
8.
Establishing VtG Policy, Program, Project Interventions, 3PIs and
3PIs Training as One
9.
Establishing VtG Mechanism for Ownership, Harmony, Alignment,
Accountability, Transparency, Transformation, Leadership, Learning, Results and
Participation (Citizens and Stakeholders), OH2A2T2LRP
10. Establishing VtG Mechanism for Policy Coherence,
Coordination, Collaboration and Cooperation for Sustainable Development, P4CSD
11. Establishing VtG Mechanism for Master Collaborative
Research Support Program, CRSP for each Action Agenda Item
It will be uphill task achieving increasing
convergence between UNSDS 2015 Outcome, ECOSOC Retreat 2 Outcome, UN Retreat on
MSP Outcome, AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, HLPF Retreat Outcome Document,
Agenda 21, FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty etc Vision Intention and
Reality. If these Visions are not achieved by 2030 Target date, the ultimate
consequences for our Fragile Planet could be catastrophic.
About ISPE /
EAG
Lanre and colleagues have for over twenty years
made great sacrifices, demonstrated uncommon zeal and exceptional patriotism in
continuing constructive engagement of relevant sub-national, national and
international stakeholders, to jointly focus on comprehensive systemic
solutions to our real and complex national political, economic, social,
security, cultural and religious problems on the ground.
International Society for Poverty Elimination,
ISPE, Volunteer Organization, is a Member of Economic Alliance Group, EAG. Some
other EAG Members include:-
1. AR &
Associates Limited, Strategy and Development Cooperation Consulting Firm –
Research, Planning, Statistics, Implementation, Monitoring, Evaluation,
Assessment, Learning, Results, Advocacy.
2. EAG - CLEAR,
Centre for Learning in Evaluation and Results, Evaluation Organization
3.
EAG - CDPM, Centre for Development Policy
Management, Research Organization
4.
EAG – FTS / FFS, Farmers Training School / Farmer
Field School, Food and Agriculture Organization
5.
EAG – ETS / EFS, Enterprise Training School /
Enterprise Field School, Entrepreneurship Development Organization
6.
EAG – PSA / PSE – Public Service Academy / Public
Service Exchange, Public Administration Organization
EAG is neutral
in promoting and protecting Sub-national, National and International
Development Cooperation. EAG work towards supporting Developed Countries
Governments; Developing Countries Governments; International Institutions /
International Foundations / Donors; Organized Communities – Neighbourhood to
Global; Media – National and International to JOINTLY Build National and Global
Collective ACTION for achieving Increasing Convergence between National and
Global Development Cooperation Goals and Targets Intention and Reality and on
schedule dates.
The core
business of the Group is the provision of Services for Strategic Management of
Complex National or International or both National and International
Development Change Processes under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial
Services Arrangement.
AR has been in
business since 1993 but registered in Nigeria in 1995. ISPE has been in
business operating as Economic Alliance International (EAI) since 2002 but
registered in Nigeria in 2007. EAG – CLEAR; EAG – CDPM; EAG – FTS; EAG – ETS;
EAG – PSA are for now domiciled in AR.
EAG has in the
past 25 years spent over US$3 Million (N1.2 Billion) to Develop the 3PCM
Approach as well as its National and Global Development Cooperation Practical
Solutions under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial Services Arrangement
within which we provided the Nigeria Federal Government alone Consultancy
Services worth over UK Pounds 10 Million (N6 Billion) Free of Charge. This is
Evidence that we do not have purely Commercial Interest but are Motivated by
Service to Humanity as the Best Work of Life, hence two of our Slogans – Let Us
Work Together to Benefit Together and …Building a Brighter Future as we
Configure our World.
Conclusion
In this Paper and earlier Papers we have
raised serious issues of serious business that deserve the serious attention of
World Leaders, 193 (over 300) Member States, UN Family Organization and
Partners from Village to Global levels. Each day delay in addressing these
fundamental issues is one day too long.
Our World has enough Resources to meet the
needs of its over 7 Billion People. Our World does not have enough Resources to
meet the GREED of over 7 Billion People. However, these Resources remain
unlocked potential if there is no new thinking, new ideas and new ways of doing
things and if Policy Makers and Decision Makers on UN Member States, UN Family
Organization and MGoS sides do not individually and collectively accept Village
to Global Solidarity is essentially for finding sustainable solutions to real
and complex World problems on the ground from Village to Global levels.
We strongly urge concerned authorities in
the UN System, 193 (over 300) Member States, UN System including WBG and IMF
and MGoS sides to individually and jointly recognize that without facing new
direction and adopting new priorities; without adopting Business Unusual doing
new things in new ways, the expected new Results will remain Mirage.
We urge World Leaders, UN Family
Organization Executives and MGoS Executives to consider stopping ongoing search
for Sustainable Solutions that exist.
Contact:
Director General
International Society
for Poverty Elimination / Economic Alliance Group
5, Moses Orimolade
Avenue,
Ijapo Estate,
Akure, Ondo State,
Nigeria.
M: +234-8162469805
Email: nehap.initiative@yahoo.co.uk 11 March
2016.
