Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Global Push To Achieve SDGs Vision and Words with Action Agenda 8

ISPE       EAG
INTERATIONAL SOCIETY FOR POVERTY ELIMINATION                   ECONOMIC ALLIANCE GROUP

Achieving AAAA, SDG and COP21 Outcome Document Vision and Words with Action Agenda by 2030 in 193 Member States – Part 5


His Excellency Mr. Andrej Logar, Chairperson of the 70th General Assembly Second Committee and Permanent Representative of Slovenia to the United Nations, convened the first informal consultations with NGOs in consultative status with ECOSOC on the agenda and work of the Second Committee on 22 October 2015, at the United Nations Headquarters. A summary of the proceedings will be made available to Member States in advance of the draft GA resolutions to be tabled later this month to be negotiated in November & December. 

This innovative step in the Second Committee represents a unique opportunity for civil society to share its distinctive perspective and concrete inputs to Member States’ deliberations on the Committee’s agenda and work in order to better respond to the challenges of implementing the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development.

The consultations included six speakers, selected to address either of the following questions:
1.      How can the Second Committee ensure that its work is in line with the objectives of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development?
2.      How should the agenda of the Second Committee look like in the coming years?

A Call was made to interested persons to provide brief and concrete written contributions, which will be posted on CSONet. We prepared Part 1 in response to the Call and in time for consideration at the 9 October meeting preparatory to this consultation and we started by expanding the Questions:-

Expanded Questions addressed in Part 1
1.      How can the Methods of Work of the GA Second Committee be effectively Aligned and Harmonized with the objectives of AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, together with the Agendas of ECOSOC and all remaining GA Committees – 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 to eliminate overlap and duplication?
2.      How should the Agendas of ECOSOC and GA Committees 1 – 6 look like in the coming years 2016 – 2030?

We prepared Part 2 for consideration at the Wednesday meeting of 14 October 2015, based on additional information available to us. We prepared Part 3 and Part 4 for consideration at the Wednesday meeting of 21 October 2015. In Part 4 we underlined the need for all 5 questions raised by His Excellency, Mr Logjar at the 9 October 2015 meeting to be fully addressed at the 22 October 2015 Consultation. That is:-
High Priority Aims and Objectives of Key Task of GA Second Committee on Continuously Improving its Working Methods and Rationalization of its Agenda:-
1.      Revitalization of the work of the GA which calls for proposals for biennialization, triennializaton, clustering and elimination of items on the Agenda of the GA.
2.       Revitalization of the work of the GA Second Committee which calls for proposals on the rationalisation of the General Debate and Introduction of Agenda Item Debates.
3.      Contribute to the fulfilment of GA mandates, particularly that contained in resolution 68/1, which provided that the ECOSOC and the GA especially its Second and Third Committees, should consider and take steps towards the rationalization of their Agendas by eliminating duplication and overlap, and promoting complimentarity in the consideration and negotiation of similar or related issues.
4.      Address the provisions of resolution 69/321, as the main outcome of the Ad-Hoc Working Group on the Revitalization of the work of the GA where each Main Committee is requested to discuss its working methods at the beginning and end of every session.
5.      Ensure that the future work of the GA Second Committee is fully aligned with the Integrated Vision of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the AAAA

Key Questions that need to be answered in Design and Delivery of above Key Task:-
1.      As currently constituted, can the Agenda of this Committee effectively support the promotion and integration of the three dimensions of sustainable development?
2.      Could sustainable development become an overarching framework for the Agenda of the Committee? What are the options for rearranging the Agenda as a whole to reflect this approach?
3.      What implications, if any, would this approach have for the outcomes and resolutions adopted by the Committee?
4.      Do the items in our Agenda adequately cover the main aspects of the 2030 Agenda?
5.      What are the gaps to be filled, bearing in mind also the work and Agenda of the Third Committee? How should the Second Committee fulfil its main mandates vis-a-vis other main Bodies and Platforms, such as the Third Committee, ECOSOC and HLPF?

It will be recalled that we stated in Part 4 “Given the guidelines set by the GA Second Committee Chair, the two questions the Second Committee set for itself, deletes many aspects of the five questions set by Mr Logar. The expanded questions we have set out above address more issues but still leave out some aspects of the five questions. This underlines urgent need for the 21 October Meeting to revert to the Original Objectives and Five Questions”.

Our hope was that the Four Papers could help enrich the work of GA Second Committee and other Village to Global Stakeholders towards achieving increasing convergence between revised AAAA, revised SDG and COP21 Outcome Document Vision Intention and Reality in each Community in each Local Government in each of the 193 Member States that is Interlinked, Interconnected and Interdependent with work towards achieving increasing convergence between Agenda 21, UNSDS 2015 Outcome Document, Synthesis Report, Data Revolution Report, World Development Report of the World Bank Group - WDR 2004 (Public Sector Management, PSM), WDR 2008 (Agriculture), WBG New PSM (2011), WDR 2014 (Risk Management), WDR 2015 (Attitudinal and Behavioural Change), FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty Program of Action 1995 etc Vision Intention and Reality in each Community in each Local Government in each of the 193 Member States.

Outcome 22 October 2015 Consultation

UNDESA described the Consultation as an “innovative step” and had prepared a “Discussion Paper” ahead of the Consultation based on the Second Committee’s 9 October meeting preparatory to the Consultation.

Comment

How “All Inclusive, All Embracing and Ambitious” was the “Discussion Paper” prepared by UNDESA? Why is it the case that suggestion to revert to the “Original Objectives and 5 questions” was avoided or evaded? Have many issues that should have been addressed at the Consultation not been left untouched? Is 22 October 2015 Consultation Outcome not essentially answer to What and Why questions? Have How questions – the reason for the Consultation not been left unanswered? Should answer to AAAA and SDG How questions still be an issue now that World Leaders endorsed SDG on 25 September 2015? Is seeking answer to How questions not at least One year behind and should meaningful effort not be made by all concerned stakeholders to cover lost ground?

If World Leaders do not know why Synthesis Report December 2014 and Data Revolution Report November 2014 How questions have not been answered to date, they will not know how to answer AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions.

If World Leaders, UNDESA, EOSG, UNGA, ECOSOC, HLPF, 193 Member States are serious about adopting Business Unusual, should the ECOSOC Dialogue on Longer Term Positioning of the UN Development System Retreat 2 tentatively scheduled for 2 – 3 November 2015 (or whatever date it holds) not be a Starting Point for Demonstrating and being seen to Demonstrate the good ideas and pertinent suggestions set out in this Paper and earlier Papers 1 – 4?

Moderator Barbara Adams, Chair, Global Policy Forum, said the revitalization of the Second Committee could contribute to strengthening the UN as a global center for doing business, as there are parts of the 2030 Agenda that UN Member States currently relegate to other fora or institutions. She noted the need to translate the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)' ambition into something structural, focusing on the practical aspects to ensure that Member States and stakeholders "go beyond New York" in implementation, and that they pool their expertise. She said the Second Committee's current working methods do not enable that. Adams cautioned that integration should not undermine deepness and specificity, and proposed thinking of UN's bodies' and committees' functional roles, in order to avoid duplication.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Ms Adams be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Ms Adams contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

Louise Kantrow, International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), said civil society could offer guidance to the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF). She stressed that everybody needs to become “fit for purpose,” not only the UN, and said many corporations are conducting mapping exercises to see how their work addresses one or more of the SDGs.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Ms Kantrow be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Ms Kantrow’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

Jeffery Huffines, CIVICUS, urged the Second Committee to strengthen the HLPF, and identified three structural deficits of the HLPF. First, he said the Forum's decision-making mandate is "ambiguous at best,” that its institutional governance should be strengthened, and that a steering committee and advisory group comprised of stakeholders should be established to provide guidance to the HLPF. He also noted the shortage of time allocated for the HLPF, calling for a five-day preparatory session to take place during the spring; and highlighted a shortage of resources, including the absence of a "well-resourced secretariat." He suggested establishing a trust fund to ensure capacity building and stakeholders' participation.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Mr. Huffines be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Mr. Huffines’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

It is pertinent to note that Mr. Huffines is the Member Wednesday Group saddled with responsibility to make Recommendations for Implementation of UNSDS 2015 Outcome and Agenda 21. Should Mr. Huffines presentation not have shared key aspects of these Recommendations? Should these Recommendations not have been subjected to debate at the Wednesday Group and Second Committee open to Global Virtual Contribution before the Second Committee make Recommendation to all relevant UN authorities on the Implementation of UNSDS 2015 Outcome and Agenda 21 as well as the Monitoring and Evaluation of this Implementation? Should these Recommendations not have enriched the 22 October 2015 Consultation? Can World Leaders, UNDESA etc be Parroting Change that is Business Unusual but Acting Anti Change that is Business as Usual and expect meaningful Progress in the implementation and evaluation of AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21, FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty Action Plan etc?

Jean Krasno, Academic Council on the UN System, noted that women's economic and political empowerment go hand-in-hand: to secure property rights, women need to be part of political decision-making structures. She explained that, for economic empowerment, women need access to credit, thus ownership of land, property, and bank accounts, and therefore women need to be part of the political processes on these matters.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Ms Krasno be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Ms Krasno’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

Daniel Dudis, Transparency International, stressed the need to address corruption in order to eradicate poverty, and spoke about civil society's role in implementing Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16 on peaceful and inclusive societies. He highlighted the value of CSO input for developing the right indicators.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Mr. Dudis be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Mr. Dudis’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

Frank Goldsmith, World Federation of Trade Unions, stressed that civil society needs to become "2030-relevant" and called for CSOs to make the 2030 Agenda an item on their respective organizations' agendas, including with regard to reporting.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Mr. Goldsmith be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Mr. Goldsmith’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

Abid Aslam, ActionAid, called for the Second Committee to ensure that: companies pay their fair share of taxes; countries' national spaces are respected so they can devise relevant policies; and the space for civil society's participation is enlarged.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Mr. Aslam be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Mr. Aslam’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

Bhumika Muchhala, Third World Network, said the 2030 Agenda offers the opportunity to strengthen the Second Committee's mandate, including on macroeconomic issues, and cited the need for strong cooperation and dialogue among the follow-up of the Second Committee's resolutions, the 2030 Agenda, and the Addis Ababa Action Agenda (AAAA).

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Mr. Muchhala be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Mr. Muchhala’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

In the discussion that followed, Brazil said the example set by the Second Committee's consultation with CSOs should be followed by other Committees. He said discussion on adapting the Committee's agenda to the 2030 Agenda should not be limited to the Second and the Third Committees (Social, Humanitarian and Cultural), as issues such as the rule of law, peaceful institutions, or non-proliferation pertain also to the First (Disarmament and International Security), Fourth (Political and Decolonization), Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) and Sixth (Legal) Committees. Brazil said civil society needs to stay “engaged and vigilant,” especially on issues that do not have designated bodies within the UN – such as SDG 10 on inequality – and support the implementation of new mandates, such as the Technology Facilitation Mechanism (TFM).

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Brazil be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Brazil’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

It is pertinent to note that Brazil’s contribution coincide with our submission that the fundamental issues under discussion concern not just the Second and Third Committees but all the six existing GA Committees and go beyond this to include urgent need to establish six new GA Committees to address Key Issues not addressed in existing Committees.

Switzerland said reviewing the Second Committee's work to support the 2030 Agenda is “tricky,” requiring “sufficient time and deliberation,” and sought for input from civil society on how to structure the HLPF in order to attract the participation of ministers from all ministries and mayors.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Switzerland be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Switzerland’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

Norway spoke about the need to avoid overlaps and duplication of work between Committees, which she argued is different from mainstreaming key cross-cutting issues such as gender equality.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Norway be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Norway’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

Japan stressed the need to ensure that local and national levels of monitoring and follow-up are open to everyone, not only the HLPF at the global level.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Japan be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Japan’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

Russia welcomed the discussion with the CSOs and invited their input on ensuring that the Second Committee integrates the three dimensions of sustainable development in its work.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by Russia be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has Russia’s contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

Representatives of civil society: said SDG 3 on health must be fully integrated in the UN General Assembly (UNGA)'s agenda, as it spans the work of both the Second and the Third Committees, and suggested joint sessions of the two Committees on issues related to SDG 3; stressed the need for the Second Committee to work with UNGA to give more prominence to geospatial management systems/geostatiscs; called to account for people with disabilities; and urged making CSO participation inclusive, rather than selective.

Comment

Can all fundamental issues raised by CSOs’ in attendance be effectively addressed without clear answers to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions? In what way has CSOs’ in attendance contribution addressed either the 2 How questions that UNDESA insisted Consultation focusing upon or the much larger focus on Original Objective and 5 questions set by Mr Logar? Can these fundamental issues raised by Mr Logar be wished away or expected to happen on its own? Can these answers be found without World Leaders effectively addressing all points raised in this Part 5 and earlier Parts 1 – 4?

It is pertinent to note that CSOs’ in attendance singled out SDG 3 for discussion. Why were the remaining 16 of 17 SDGs’ omitted? It is pertinent to note further that an open letter to Co Chairs IAEG – SDG Indicators highlight important issues of Human Rights in all its Ramifications; Measuring Every Part of the Agenda; Collecting Disaggregated Data; Data for Governments and other Duty Bearers Accountability; Easy to Measure, Costly to Measure, Number of Indicators should not be Indicator Choice Criteria; Indicator Choice Criteria should support Indivisibility and Interdependence of all 17 SDG; Universality to enable comparison of progress within and between Countries, Regions and Globally; Focus on People in ways that effectively deliver meaningful Changes in the lives of ordinary People in each Community in each Local Government in each of the 193 Member States. Report on proceedings at the ongoing IEAG-SDG Conference in Thailand suggest that these fundamental issues that ought to have been settled remain contentious. Had the 22 October 2015 meeting endorsed the position in the CSOs’ open letter, would the IEAG-SDG Conference be seeking to reverse issues that had been settled?

Do World Leaders, UNDESA, EOSG, UNGA, ECOSOC, HLPF and Partners recognize that correct answer to all AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21, FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty Action Plan etc How questions lie in the DOING? That without immediately:-
1.      Appointing Reform Adviser and Global Coordinating Consultant on AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, etc Policy Coherence, Coordination, Collaboration and Cooperation for Sustainable Development, P4CSD to UNGA, ECOSOC and HLPF and Partners
2.      Selecting One Worldwide Approach
3.      Establishing Mater Multi Stakeholder Platform, MSP and MSPs for each Action Agenda item Village to Global, VtG
4.      Establishing Multidisciplinary Professionals Community of Practice on Poverty Elimination and Environmental Sustainability as VtG Platform for all relevant existing and new Disciplines
5.      Addressing issues of Trust, Silos, Honesty, Thinking, Solidarity, Attitude, Behavior, Communication etc VtG
6.      Connecting each Community in each Local Government in each of the 193 Member States to UN Headquarters New York
7.      Establishing VtG Mechanism for Correct Diagnosis, Prescription, Surgery and Recovery Management
8.      Establishing VtG Policy, Program, Project Interventions, 3PIs and 3PIs Training as One
9.      Establishing VtG Mechanism for Ownership, Harmony, Alignment, Accountability, Transparency, Transformation, Leadership, Learning, Results and Participation (Citizens and Stakeholders), OH2A2T2LRP
10. Establishing VtG Mechanism for Policy Coherence, Coordination, Collaboration and Cooperation for Sustainable Development, P4CSD
11. Establishing VtG Mechanism for Master Collaborative Research Support Program, CRSP for each Action Agenda Item
It will be uphill task achieving increasing convergence between AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21, FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty etc Vision Intention and Reality. If these Visions are not achieved by 2030 Target date, the ultimate consequences for our Fragile Planet could be catastrophic.

About ISPE / EAG

Lanre and colleagues have for over twenty years made great sacrifices, demonstrated uncommon zeal and exceptional patriotism in continuing constructive engagement of relevant sub-national, national and international stakeholders, to jointly focus on comprehensive systemic solutions to our real and complex national political, economic, social, security, cultural and religious problems on the ground.

In this period we have been working spiritedly towards helping to make Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and World Hunger and Poverty history and in record time. In this period also, our Lanre Rotimi (Nigerian) and Dr. Hellmut Eggers (German) have created 3PCM, Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management Approach to Benefits focused National and International Development Cooperation – the most advance such Approach in our World today. 3PCM has been tried and tested, the Biggest Test so far in NIPOST 2000 – 2001.

3PCM uses Living Strategy or Communication Strategy and so it is Dynamic and continuing to improve daily. Glorious Heights reached by NIPOST at the time has NEVER been equalled even when NIPOST later received Technical Support from Netherlands / Dutch Postal Administration. We have built considerable expertise, experience and exposure in Nigeria, UK and EC that bring Whole of Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and World Thinking to bear in finding practical solutions to all identified complex systemic problems in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and World, fully implementing the solutions and effectively monitoring and evaluating this implementation in ways that achieve increasing convergence between National and Global Development Cooperation Goals and Targets Intention and Reality and on scheduled dates.

International Society for Poverty Elimination, ISPE, Volunteer Organization, is a Member of Economic Alliance Group, EAG. EAG has the following additional Members:-
1.      AR & Associates Limited, Strategy and Development Cooperation Consulting Firm – Research, Planning, Statistics, Implementation, Monitoring, Evaluation, Assessment, Learning, Results, Advocacy.
2.      EAG - CLEAR, Centre for Learning in Evaluation and Results, Evaluation Organization
3.      EAG - CDPM, Centre for Development Policy Management, Research Organization
4.      EAG – FTS / FFS, Farmers Training School / Farmer Field School, Food and Agriculture Organization
5.      EAG – ETS / EFS, Enterprise Training School / Enterprise Field School, Entrepreneurship Development Organization
6.      EAG – PSA / PSE – Public Service Academy / Public Service Exchange, Public Administration Organization

EAG is neutral in promoting and protecting Sub-national, National and International Development Cooperation. EAG work towards supporting Developed Countries Governments; Developing Countries Governments; International Institutions / International Foundations / Donors; Organized Communities – Neighbourhood to Global; Media – National and International to JOINTLY Build National and Global Collective ACTION for achieving Increasing Convergence between National and Global Development Cooperation Goals and Targets Intention and Reality and on schedule dates.

The core business of the Group is the provision of Services for Strategic Management of Complex National or International or both National and International Development Change Processes under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial Services Arrangement.

AR has been in business since 1993 but registered in Nigeria in 1995. ISPE has been in business operating as Economic Alliance International (EAI) since 2002 but registered in Nigeria in 2007. EAG – CLEAR; EAG – CDPM; EAG – FTS; EAG – ETS; EAG – PSA are for now domiciled in AR.

EAG has in the past 20 years spent over US$2 Million (N300 Million) to Develop the 3PCM Approach as well as its National and Global Development Cooperation Practical Solutions under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial Services Arrangement within which we provided the Nigeria Federal Government alone Consultancy Services worth over UK Pounds 10 Million (N2.5 Billion) Free of Charge. This is Evidence that we do not have purely Commercial Interest but are Motivated by Service to Humanity as the Best Work of Life, hence two of our Slogans – Let Us Work Together to Benefit Together and …Building a Brighter Future as we Configure our World.

Conclusion

In this Paper and four earlier Papers we have raised serious issues of serious business that deserve the serious attention of World Leaders, 193 Member States, UN Family Organization and Partners from Village to Global levels. Each day delay in addressing these fundamental issues is one day too long.

It is a puzzle that World Leaders, EOSG, UNDESA, UNGA, ECOSOC, HLPF and partners appear to be sincere in the search for sound and sustainable solutions to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21, FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty Action Plan etc How questions but consistently reject the most Comprehensive – All Inclusive, All Embracing and Ambitious answer to these How questions, available anywhere in our World today. Can World Leaders, EOSG, UNDESA, UNGA, ECOSOC, HLPF and Partners recognize correct answer to these How questions when presented to them?

The ultimate consequences of failure to achieve 2030 Agenda Targets in each of the 193 Member States could be catastrophic. This is avoidable should World Leaders take positive Action on ideas and suggestions set out in Paper 1, Paper 2, Paper 3, Paper 4, Paper 5 and supporting documents – available upon request.

We are willing to offer a more detailed information / clarification as directed by GA Second Committee and or other relevant UN Authority.


Contact:
Director General
International Society for Poverty Elimination / Economic Alliance Group
5, Moses Orimolade Avenue,
Ijapo Estate, Akure,  Ondo State,
Nigeria.
M: +234-8162469805

Email: nehap.initiative@yahoo.co.uk                                                    27 October 2015.

No comments:

Post a Comment