Wednesday, September 26, 2018

Global Push To Achieve SDGs Vision and Words with Action Agenda 56


  EAG         ISPE 
             ECONOMIC ALLIANCE GROUP                                           INTERATIONAL SOCIETY FOR POVERTY ELIMINATION (Global NGO)             
(Global Integrated Sustainable Solutions Provider)             
    ER&A        NEHMAP Initiative
       ER and Associates Limited              New End Hunger, Malnutrition and Poverty (Global Social Enterprise)                  
(International Development Cooperation Consultants)

Sustainable Solutions to 193/306 UN Member States SDG Pledge Delivery by 2030: HPLF July 2018 Outcome - Matters Arising (4)?

EAG Thoughts on Priorities and Direction in the Implementation and Evaluation of Food, Nutrition, Agriculture and Security Vision Dimension Linked to Public Sector Management, Public Finance Management, Procurement and Governance Dimension of  Transformation Agenda – AAAA, SDG, COP21 and Agenda 21 for Delivery on SDG Pledge - No Goal will be considered met if it is not met by all Peoples in all  Countries by 2030 Target date.

Introduction

As World Leaders gather for opening of UNGA 73, three years after gathering for UNGA 70, to agree the UN led Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs, aimed at delivering Sustainable Solutions to real and complex World Political, Economic, Social, Security, Peace, Cultural, Religious and Environmental problems on the ground in each specific Community, Country or Continent location context by 2030, there is an urgent need for World Leaders to pause and do critical review of successes, flaws and failures in past three years as basis for Rethinking SDGs Pledge (which states that No Goal will be considered met if it is not achieved by all Peoples in all Countries) delivery by end 2030 target date, barely 12 years remaining.

In Paper (1) we urged National Leaders and World Leaders to appreciate that as long as they do not know why the unfinished business of MDGs is yet to be completed as at 11 of 60 Quarters of Implementation of SDGs, they will not know HOW to Reform National and International Development Cooperation Systems in ways that strengthen all 193/306 UN Member States to get back On Track and achieve delivery on SDGs Pledge.

In Paper (2) we expressed concern that DCF May 2018 and HPLF July 2018 ignored our suggestions for finding answer to SDGs/SDGs Pledge How Questions as Master Key for getting all 193/306 UN Member States back on Track towards achieving delivery on SDGs Pledge by end 2030 target date.


In Paper (3), we elaborated more on the SDGs Concepts of Work Together Benefit Together and Leave No One Behind as Operative and Directive Principles of National / State Policy in all Countries, if the Task that must be done to achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in remaining 12 1/4 years is to be Done in all 193/306 UN Member States.

In this Paper, we are commenting on the UNSG Comment July 2018 on UNJIU Private Sector Partnerships for SDGs/SDGs Pledge delivery Report 2017, UNJIU PSP for SDG Report 2017 and DCF May 2018 Outcome Document released September 2018. We argue that for as long as UNO Entities Authorities at Headquarters, Regional Offices and Country Offices and 193/306 UN Member States Governments Authorities in all Arms of all Tiers refuse to do the first Works – adopt One Worldwide / Universal Approach to achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in barely 12 years remaining; adopt One Worldwide Implementation and Evaluation Framework for achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in barely 12 years remaining and answer Country Sustainability Strategy and SDG in Country in all 193/306 UN Member States for achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in barely 12 years remaining, it will be Mission Impossible getting all 193/306 UN Member States currently Off Track, back On Track and achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in barely 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date.

The reality is that should all Communities, Countries and Continents in our World today, fail to achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge by end 2030 target date the Ultimate Consequences will be Catastrophic for all Citizens, especially the over 4 billion Poor in all North and South Countries in our World today. 

UNSG Comment July 2018 on UNJIU Private Sector Partnerships Arrangements in the Context of 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

This Report transmits the UN Secretary General, UNSG comments and those of the UN Chief Executives Board, UNCEB to the UN General Assembly Members on the Report of the UN Joint Inspection Unit, UNJIU.
https://undocs.org/A/73/186/ADD.1    UNSG July 2018 comment on JIU PSP for SDG Report 2017

United Nations Organization Entities welcomed the Report and generally support its findings and recommendations. However some concerns were expressed. We wish to respond to some of these concerns:-
1.    One Cap Fit All – UNO Entities note that One Cap Fit All Approach to Partnering with the Private Sector is bound to present Challenges and be subject to limitations. The UNJIIU Report underlined this point and so the UNSG Comment repeating the point is no issue or amount to no issue.
2.    UNO Entities note that the Report focusing primarily on Headquarters does not elaborate sufficiently on the capacity needs at regional, sub-regional, country and sub-country levels. UNJIU needs to respond to this point and quickly too.
3.    UNO Entities note that the Report does not reflect the establishment at the National level of a dedicated Results Group for Strategic Partnerships within context of United Nations Sustainable Development Group. UNJIU needs to respond to this point and quickly too.
4.  UNO Entities note that the terms “private sector” and “business sector” were used interchangeably and that there is a need for clarity on “for profit” and “not for profit” enterprises as well as clarity on the role of “social economy and social enterprise” organizations. UNJIU needs to respond to this point and quickly too.
5.   UNO Entities call on UNJIU to be specific in the formulation of its recommendations, especially those recommendations on systems, structures, policies, procedures, cultures and rules changes at Headquarters, Regional Offices, Sub-Regional Offices, Country Offices and Sub-Country Offices. UNJIU needs to respond to this point and quickly too.
6.      UNO Entities noted that Recommendation 1 is addressed to UNGA.
7. UNO Entities in welcoming Recommendation 2 raise practical Procurement and Transparency Challenges. It appears existing UGA Rules as endorsed by UNSG in consultation with UNCEB will not be changed. Should this be the case, the Implementation of Recommendation 2 will be in jeopardy. As all the 12 Recommendations are Indivisible – Interrelated, Interconnected, Interdependent and Interlinked, UNO Entities should take all necessary measures to ensure that all Needed Change is Undertaken and On Time.
8.  UNO Entities in welcoming Recommendation 3 call on UNJIU to clarify “providing advice” regarding “what advice is to be provided”, “who is to provide it” and “to whom is it to be provided”. This underline urgent need for UNJIU to show that the present situation wherein UNO Entities in Partnering with Private Sector seek Mutually Exclusive Funding Support and Technical Support at the expense of Private Sector that seek Profit Making and Brand Visibility cannot inspire Private Sector to join in building the Type of Partnership Arrangements required to meaningfully support UNO Entities to help 193/306 UN Member States in the great work towards achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in barely 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date. The clarification UNJIU would provide need to better underline the reality of Mutually Inclusive Partnership wherein UNO Entities seek Funding Support and Technical Support that is Aligned and Harmonized with Private Sector seeking Profit Making and Brand Visibility.

UNJIU Private Sector Partnerships Arrangement in the Context of 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Report 2017

This UNJIU Report Calls for A New Momentum in the Concept of Partnerships as Vehicle through which UNO Entities, 193/306 UN Member States and their National and International Partners can facilitate Joint Actions to ensure delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in the barely 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date.
https://undocs.org/JIU/REP/2017/8  UN JIU PSP for SDG Report 2017

It challenges UNO Entities and 193/306 UN Member States to demonstrate and be seen to demonstrate Paradigm Shifts from MDG Mode to SDG Mode alongside other complimentary Paradigm Shifts, if all 193/306 UN Member States currently Off Track achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge will get back On Track and achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in the barely 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date.

The Report notes that the UNO Entities need to first “Transform Itself – Individually and Jointly before the UNO could be in a position to contribute meaningfully towards helping our World to Transform and in ways that help all 193/306 UN Member States achieve delivery on SDGs/SDG Pledge in the barely 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date.

The Report notes that 3 years after the SDGs is still an Aspiration and do not describe existing reality on the ground in each specific Community, Country and Continent location context. That is the SDGs as is are essentially imply a process that urgently needs to be effectively supported by concrete, cohesive, collaborative, cooperative, coordinated and committed Systems, Structures, Policies, Procedures, Cultures, Communication, Rules and Legal CHANGES in the current normative, administration and operational arrangements.

The Report proposes a determined focus on Systems Wide Action driven by all relevant SDGs/SDGs Pledge delivery by 2030 National and International Stakeholders in each specific Community, Country and Continent location context Converging Wills within 12 Indivisible Recommendations – Interrelated, Interconnected, Interdependent and Interlinked. That is fail in 1 Recommendation as applicable in each specific Community, Country or Continent location context fail in all 12 Recommendations in that specific Community, Country, Continent location context.

The Heart of the Report is the Section on Operational and Administrative Aspects of Partnerships. This Section addresses fundamental issues of Motivation; Challenges and Obstacles – Bureaucracy, Inadequate and Outdated Rules, Organizational Culture – Risk Aversion, Reluctance of Member States to Cooperate with Private Sector, Lack of Appropriate Partnership Impact Assessment; Human Resources – Capacity Building.

It is here that fundamental issues raised on the Report by UNSG on behalf of UNO Entities and our Organizations’ response to the UNSG Comment could be addressed under “Make It” or “Lose It” Decision by UNO Entities – Headquarters, Regional Offices, Sub-Regional Offices, Country Offices and Sub-Country Offices Authorities and 193/306 UN Member States – All Arms of All Tiers Authorities.

The import of the Report is that if the UNO Authorities and 193/306 UN Member States Authorities are genuinely interested in making sure all 193/306 UN Member States achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in the barely 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date, then these concerned Authorities need to go back to basics or first Works:-
1.   Distinguish between Financial Mobilization Private Sector Partnership Arrangements for achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in all 193/306 UN Member States by 2030 and Innovation Development; Capacity Building; Technology Development; Technology Transfer; Intellectual Property; Attitudinal Change; Institutional Reform; Development Communication; Sustainability Governance Private Sector Partnerships Arrangements for achieving delivery on  SDGs/SDGs Pledge in all 193/306 UN Member States by end 2030.
2. Answer Private Sector Partnership Arrangements for achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in all 193/306 UN Member States by 2030 How Questions.

DCF May 2018 Outcome Document released September 2018

In compliance with UNGA resolution that the HLPF Meetings take into account the work of the DCF, the DCF Secretariat submitted a Summary of DCF May 2018, setting out 12 Key Messages and suggesting “concrete policy guidance” for consideration at HLPF July 2018.

It is a puzzle that both DCF May 2018 and HLPF July 2018 ignored our Organizations suggestions on the need for DCF May 2018 and HLPF July 2018 to answer SDGs/SDGs Pledge How Questions. The probability is high that ongoing UNGA 73 and HLM on Finance for Development would also avoid or evade finding answer to SDGs/SDGs Pledge How Questions. As long as UNO Entities and 193/306 UN Member States keep avoiding or evading finding answer to SDGs/SDGs Pledge How Questions, it will be Mission Impossible getting all 193/306 UN Member States back On Track to achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in barely 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date.

It is a bigger puzzle that the Summary is raising issues that can only be meaningfully addressed through finding answer to SDGs/SDGs Pledge How Questions including Private Sector Partnership Arrangements for achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in all 193/306 UN Member States in barely 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date.

We note with interest that the following Key Messages in the Summary (7 of 12), make these puzzles even bigger:-

Key Message (i) Development cooperation needs to change more radically and at a vastly accelerated pace to meet the deadlines and expectations set out in the 2030 Agenda. The situation demands both bold and inclusive leadership and timeliness of action on the part of policymakers and practitioners at all levels, drawing on the latest thinking, evidence and research from around the world.

Key Message (ii) Development cooperation must do more to truly focus policies and action first on those furthest behind. It must boost inclusiveness and put cross-cutting emphasis on gender equality, the empowerment of women and girls and the inclusion of youth and other marginalized groups.

Key Message (iv) Development cooperation has to become more risk-informed, conflict-sensitive and resilience-smart, with stronger links to climate action. Silo and short-term approaches will fail.

Key Message (v) Development cooperation should bring innovation and more focused action to the means of participation, with a view to enabling people to engage meaningfully in development processes and other efforts to strengthen not only capacity but also confidence in public institutions.

Key Message (vi) Development cooperation should help to seize the opportunities that digitalization brings, including in mobilizing national resources and building national statistical capacity, bearing in mind the risks and without worsening the digital divide.
Key Message (vii) Priority should go to putting in place national development cooperation policies as part of public sector reform and alignment with the 2030 Agenda and the Addis Ababa Action Agenda. Evidence shows that such policies can be powerful tools for getting better results from development cooperation and lifting the quality of partnerships over time.
Key Message (viii) Stakeholders in public-private partnerships should build on the principles of inclusiveness and transparency, as well as on existing capacities, plans and exchanges, while recognizing that the effectiveness and impact of such partnerships are context-specific. Analytical work and policy dialogue on blended finance that aligns with country priorities and brings about sustainable development must urgently be accelerated, without reversing gains in quality and effectiveness.
These bigger puzzles underline the UNJIU finding that UNO Entities, including UNGA, DCF, ECOSOC – Individually and Jointly need to first Transform itself/themselves before the UNO Delivering as One (DaO) can be in a stronger position to help 193/306 UN Member States achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge by 2030 and in the process help Transform Our World for Sustainable Solutions to real and complex National and International Development, Diplomacy, Defence, Digitization, Data, Democracy (Capitalist Extreme or Socialist /Communist Extreme or anywhere in-between a North or South Country may be) problems on the ground in each specific Community (Rural/Urban), Country (North / South) or Continent (North / South) location context.

The Big Question is Can these Transformation on UNO; UN System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO (ITO) – Headquarters, Regional Offices, Sub-Regional Offices, Country Offices and Sub-Country Offices and 193/306 UN Member States – all Arms of All Tiers be achieved without all concerned Authorities meaningfully addressing all points made in this Paper and related EAG Papers and on Time?
http://undocs.org/E/2018/73   UN DCF May 2018 Outcome Document 
  
GCEC Unlocking the Inclusive Growth Story of the 21st Century Report September 2018

Urgent SDGs/SDGs Pledge Implementation and Evaluation Action Needed Now

To meaningfully address above layers and layers of complex issues as applicable in each specific community, country, continent, global location context, there is a need to strengthen systemic implementation, monitoring and evaluation of continued compliance between projected targets and actual achievement.

This is one area where all national and international stakeholders will have to speedily come up with a more systematic approach within 3 Steps – Leave No One Behind and Work Together Benefit Together Concepts:-
a)  Analysis / Examine – Desk Analysis; Orientation Workshops; Management Surveys, Engineering Surveys and Financial Surveys;
b)  Pilot Program and Scale Up Program – Empower and Enact – Implementation and Evaluation of Study Reports and Conferences and Meetings Outcome Documents Conclusions and Recommendations to Test Innovative and Creative Ideas harvested from (a) in Pilot Program, Adjust Pilot Program to address flaws and failures in real life situation before blowing up in Scale Up Program as appropriate in specific Community, Country, Continent location context;
c)      Building Bridge between Lessons Learning and Lessons Forgetting – Applied History and Dynamic Communication – Move (b) forward in ways that ensure National and Global Goals are achieved by Target Dates through Communication Strategy that ensure all National and International Stakeholders are aware of the Results - Success and Failures, and Challenges – Opportunities and Threats facing each Partner and ways and means the Partner is addressing same, noting that High Flyers enjoy Gains and Laggards endure Losses but Laggards Losses pose Risks to High Flyers if same remain unaddressed. This makes High Flyers and Laggards genuinely appreciate that Leave No One Behind and Work Together Benefit Together are indeed SDGs/SDGs Pledge Concepts that is in the enlightened self interest of both High Flyers and Laggards to fully implement.

The starting point in the implementation of the 3 Steps of Action is a renewed effort to support all 193/306 UN Member States to achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date, should be long-term, strategic-level, low-carbon action plans, supported by a holistic national urban/rural planning approach that enables the integration of large mainstream investment flows rather than a project-by-project approach on the sidelines of core development strategies and decisions.

This will require capacity building for policy making and financial instruments to assist the cities/communities in both developed and developing nations with the up-front investments needed to create and undertake low-carbon initiatives. Such support should be an impor­tant part of any global climate/SDGs Pledge delivery negotiation outcome.

It will also require the Professional tackling of the Leadership Challenge in all North and South Countries in our World today through:-
1.   Leadership Burden: Presidents/Prime Ministers/Heads of Government, who mean well and genuinely desire and promise to deliver positive change for greatest number of citizens – Most Popular when Least Effective and Least Popular when Most Effective. Time Lag between Painful Decisions and Beneficial Results deceive Public to continue being fickle – they seek to avoid or evade Pain while seeking to enjoy and celebrate Gain. The Challenge of Mastering this paradox is one that Good Leaders must overcome.
2.  Government Effectiveness: The Business of Government is Governance. Governance Sustainability greatly depends on Government Effectiveness and Vice Versa. All North and South Countries Need Capacity in Government to Get Things Done. This Capacity determines if the Country will demonstrate and be seen to demonstrate minimum certain levels of Government Effectiveness and Governance Sustainability required to design and deliver, National and Global Goals by target date in each specific Community, Country or Continent location context.
3.     The Big Issues Challenging North and South Countries in our World today are essentially similar – Growing National Economies in ways that create opportunities for all especially the disadvantaged and deprived; Providing High Quality Food, Health, Employment, Entrepreneurship and Education Services; Ensuring Safety, Security and Justice. In most cases the Best Sustainable Solutions for each specific Community, Country or Continent location context are already know – exist in some Study Report or Conference/Meeting Outcome Document but need to be updated and complemented with appropriate Field Work – Orientation Workshops and Surveys: Management, Engineering and Financial.
4.    In the 21st Century, meeting this Challenge in each North or South Country is no longer about Political Leaders knocking down Political Opponents arguments, it is about Political Leaders in Power:-
a)    Building Up a Robust System of Government appropriate to their specific Community, Country and Continent location context that deliver Results – the National and Global Goals by target date.
b)   Appreciating that Pace of Change in the 21st Century is Incredible – New Technologies in Communications, Energy, Medicine etc; New Global Challenges like Climate Change, Migration and Terrorism etc; Existing Global Challenges like Financial Crisis; Food Crisis, Fuel Crisis, Corruption etc. Only Systemic Change that Totally Overhaul or Rebuild the System will be adequate to deliver the Sustainable Solutions for the Results Citizens desire and deserve.
c)     Appreciating that the Best Systemic Change Design and Delivery start from the Right Conceptual Analysis. Whereas much of Politics is conducted in a completely non intellectual atmosphere, the Best Policy actually comes from a clear and rigorous intellectual approach. There must be an unbroken thread between a Conceptual Analysis on what the real problem on the ground is, then an Orientation or Direction in order to resolve it and then a specific Policy, Program, Project Intervention, 3PI and 3PI Training as One. This sequence is crucial – the specific 3PI and 3PI Training as One has to flow from specific Policy Direction and the Policy Direction has to come from a Right Conceptual Analysis.
d)     Appreciating that the Implementation and Evaluation of 3PI and 3PI Training as One needs to be firmly grounded in Accountability that are based on Commitments to both Internal and External Publics.
e)    Appreciating that Government Effectiveness and Governance Sustainability must be measured in the Simplicity of Live Events that have meaning to Individual and Corporate Citizens.
f)       Appreciating that Government Effectiveness and Governance Sustainability delivering Simplicity of Life Events to Individual and Corporate Citizens must be firmly grounded in Innovation and Creativity that Work for the specific Community, Country or Continent location context.
g)     Appreciating that Innovation and Creativity that Work depends of favourable climate – political, cultural, economic, financial, social, security, justice etc promoting “Work Together to Benefit Together” and “Leave No One Behind” Concepts of the SDGs.
h)     Appreciating that design and delivery of SDGs in Country and Country Sustainability Strategy in all North and South Countries must be driven by Sustainable Public/Civil Service for Sustainable Transformation of Society in each specific Community, Country and Continent location context.
i)    Appreciating that getting all 193/306 UN Member States back On Track to achieve Delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in barely 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date greatly depends on strengthening National Economy in all 193/306 UN Member States in ways that enable greater Economic Mobility and Prosperity for all especially the Disadvantaged and Deprived. This will involve Investing much of the US$ 700 Trillion to finance SDGs/SDGs Pledge delivery in Opportunity that Empower People to Build Wealth, Create Value, Foster Revitalization, Promote Resilience, Invigorate Civic Engagement and meaningfully address Risk of Hunger, Malnutrition and Poverty in each specific Community, Country or Continent location context. The US$ 700 Trillion SDGs/SDGs Pledge Delivery Investment Approach will require Building and Mobilizing Four Types of Capital as a means to promote and protect Economic Mobility and Prosperity – Financial Capital – Resources Measured in terms of Monetary Value; Human Capital – the Knowledge, Experience, Ability and Creativity of People; Physical Capital – Real Assets: including Real Estate, Land and Infrastructure and Social Capital – Networks and Relationships that Connect People, Create Value and Enable Change. It is Fail in One of the Four Types of Capital Fail in All. Also it is Social Economy and Social Enterprise Organizations that are most able to Operationalize in Practice all Four Types of Capital as appropriate in each specific Community, Country or Continent location context.
j)     Appreciating that the actual People developing and enacting Policy Political Leaders in Power appoint Matter. They must have minimum certain levels of Hard Competencies: Learning and Skills and Soft Competencies: Character, Courage, Cultural, Discipline and Mindset required to ensure that the Duty Bearer is able to deliver on the Duties and Responsibilities of the Office he/she occupy.
k)     Appreciating that Governments around the World – Big or Small; Rich or Poor; North or South can and should Learn from One Another.
l)    Appreciating that Governments in both North and South Countries need help from competent External Consultants if they are to achieve Sustainable Success grappling with these Big Challenges.
5.      The UNO Entities in particular and UN System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO (ITO) Entities in general have much to contribute if all North and South Countries are to achieve meaningful success overcoming Challenges in (4). If these UNO Entities and UN System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO (ITO Entities are to help Transform our World, they must first Transform themselves. To achieve this, these UNO Entities and UN System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO (ITO) Entities need help from competent External Consultants.
6.      Global Platforms like GPEDC also have Central Roles to Play in (4) and (5).
7.      Regional Political Groupings – EU/EC; AU/AC and equivalent in all remaining Regions in our World have Central Roles to Play in (4) and (5).

Rapid and Radical Change in National and International Development Cooperation

The UNJIU, UNSG and all remaining UNO Entities need to meaningfully address Design and Delivery of Social Protection and Social Development, SPSD and Social Economy and Social Enterprise, SESE Dimension and Beyond SPSD and SESE Dimension of achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context through deploying 3 Steps above towards:-
A)     Transformational ICT and Technology for achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context.
B)   Wiser Energy Management (Domestic; Commercial; Industrial; Transportation – Air, Water, Road, Rail; Agricultural) for achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context.
C)  Innovation and Investment for Mobilizing US$700 Trillion to achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context.

To Drive Policy, Program, Project Interventions, 3PIs and 3PIs Training as One within:-
i)    Inclusive / Lifelong Education – Education for Sustainable Development, Education for Sustainable Citizenship, Education for Sustainable Consumption and Education for Sustainable Production to achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context.
ii)  Inclusive / Lifelong Entrepreneurship – Public Organization, Commercial Organization, Social Organization and Volunteer Organization to achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context.
iii)  Smarter Urban / Rural Development to achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context.
iv) Sustainable Land Use to achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context.
v)    Wiser Water Management (Domestic, Commercial, Industrial, Agricultural) to achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context.
vi)  Circular Industrial Economy to achieve delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in each specific Community, Country, Continent location context
In all UN Member States, within One Worldwide Global Goals Project using One Worldwide Approach that Work; One Worldwide Implementation and Evaluation Framework that Work; One Global Central Coordinating Internal Consultant; One Global Central Coordinating External Consultant and Multiple Paradigm Shifts – from MDG Mode: Project by Project, Piecemeal, Silo, Arithmetic, Academic Research, Business as Usual (BAU), Rigid etc to SDG Mode: Systems, Process, Synergy, Geometric, Development Research, Business Unusual (BUU), Transformational etc.

We suggest the establishment of UNO-IRG (United Nations Organization Independent Reform Group) as Global Central Coordinating Internal Consultant Leading UNS-IRG (United Nations System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO (ITO) –IRG inclusive of UNO-IRG inclusive of IRG for each UNO Entity – UNDESA, UNDP, FAO, WHO, UNRISD, UNESCO, ECOSOC, ILO etc; WBG-IRG inclusive of all 5 Institutions – World Bank-IRG, IFC-IRG, IDA-IRG etc; IMF-IRG inclusive of all IMF Institutions IRGs ; WTO (ITO)-IRG inclusive of all WTO (ITO) Institutions IRGs.

We suggest EAG/ISPE/ER/NEHMAP as Global Central Coordinating External Consultant.

The point we are making is that to achieve UNJIU and UNO Private Sector Participation Vision that is Integral Part of achieving SDG/SDG Pledge Vision in all UN Member State in the barely 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date, there is urgent need to meaningfully address SPSD and SESE as well as Beyond SPSD and SESE real and complex issues on the ground in each Community and Country in all Regions across the World.

Should this point resonate positively with UNJIU and UNSG Guterres, these issues need to be addressed immediately in all UNO Entities Major Events from September – December 2018 and in ways that meaningfully rebuild Foundation for achieving delivery on SDG/SDG Pledge by High Flying Countries by 2029 and Laggard Countries by Mid 2030. Also Key UNO Entities – EOSG, OPGA, OPECOSOC, UNDESA, UNCEB, UNJIU, OSAR (Adviser Reform), UNOP, UN Business, UN Global Compact, UNESCO, FAO, UNDP, WHO, UNDPI, UNRISD, UNICEF, UNEP, UNIDO, UNCTAD be Foundation UNO Partners with EAG/ISPE/ER/NEHMAP to deploy the 3 Steps before expanding Partnership to all UNO Entities based on realities of 3 Step Implementation.

Delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in All Countries by 2030 – Calendar of Activities

October 2018 – December 2018: Rebuilding Foundation
·        Adopt One Worldwide Approach
·        Establish Private Sector Partnership Arrangement for SDG that Work
·        Establish Multi Stakeholder Platforms for SDG that Work
·        Start Mutual Collaboration Activities within above 3 Steps

January 2019 – June 2028: Start and Accelerate Final PUSH to Achieve SDGs/SDGs Pledge Delivery by 2030
·     Accelerate Implementation and Evaluation of Mutual Collaboration Activities within above 3 Steps
·       Work Towards All High Flying North and South Countries and Most Laggard North and South Countries achieving Delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge

January 2029 – June 2030: Intensify Acceleration on Final PUSH to Achieve SDGs/SDGs Pledge Delivery by 2030
·   Intensify Acceleration of Implementation and Evaluation of Mutual Collaboration Activities within above 3 Steps
·       Work Towards All remaining Laggard North and South Countries achieving Delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge

July 2030 – December 2030: Final Global Surveillance to ensure All Communities, Countries (North and South) and Continents (North and South) achieve Delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge by end 2030
·   Intensify Acceleration of Implementation and Evaluation of Mutual Collaboration Activities within above 3 Steps
·       Work Towards All remaining Laggard North and South Countries achieving Delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge

All National and International Stakeholders need to have a Common Meaning and Common Understanding of One Universal / One Worldwide Approach that is an Approach based upon Common Agreement, Common Systems, Common Structures, Common Processes, Common Rules, Common Regulations, for Promoting and Protecting Common Interest, Common Future, Common Purpose and Common Destiny in each specific Community (Rural or Urban), Country (North or South) and Continent (North or South) location context.

UNO Authorities and 193/306 UN Member States Authorities need to appreciate that it is UNO and UN Member States that can create DEMAND for SDGs/SDGs Pledge Sustainable Solutions applicable to each specific Community, Country or Continent location context and it is in response that Private Sector including Social Economy and Social Enterprise Organizations can create SUPPLY for these Sustainable Solutions. As long as all fundamental issues raised in the UNJIU Report, UNSG Comment on the Report and EAG Comment on the Report, UNSG Comment and DCF 2018 Outcome Document continue to be evaded or avoided by relevant UNO Authorities and UN Member States – North and South Authorities, achieving delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in barely 12 years remaining will be Mirage. Allowed to occur in reality the ultimate consequences will be catastrophic for over 7 billion people in our World today, especially the over 4 billion poor people the UNO claim to serve.

Conclusion

The Private Sector are Major Players if the over US$700 Trillion required to fund the SDGs Pledge delivery in next 10 – 12 years is to be raised and effectively utilized. Time is of the essence if all fundamental issues raised in UNJIU Report, UNSG Comment on the Report, DCF May 2018 Outcome Document and EAG Comment on these Reports are to be meaningfully addressed by all concerned National and Global Authorities and in ways that ensure Bright Prospects of success achieving delivery on SDGs Pledge is not squandered.

The GPEDC and Regional Political Groupings EU/EC, AU/AC etc needs to better deploy its Power as Convener, Catalyst, Collaborator and Cultivator, if it is to better support 193/306 UN Member States Governments – All Arms and All Tiers; UNO System: UNO, WBG, IMF, WTO (ITO) Entities – Headquarters, Regional Offices; Sub-Regional Offices; Country Offices and Sub-Country Offices and their National and International Partners including CSOs/NGOs; Academia; Commercial Enterprises; Social Enterprises in the work towards getting all North and South Countries back On Track to achieve Delivery on SDGs/SDGs Pledge in barely 12 years remaining to end 2030 target date.   

Contact:
Director General
Economic Alliance Group (Global Integrated Sustainable Solutions Provider)
Affiliate Members: International Society for Poverty Elimination (Global NGO);
ER and Associates Limited (International Development Cooperation Consultants)
New End Hunger, Malnutrition and Poverty, NEHMAP Initiative (Global Social Enterprise) etc
M: +234-8162469805
Email: nehap.initiative@yahoo.co.uk   info@nehmapglobal.org       26 September 2018.

Updated 5 October 2018.

No comments:

Post a Comment