ISPE EAG
INTERATIONAL
SOCIETY FOR POVERTY ELIMINATION ECONOMIC
ALLIANCE GROUP
Achieving AAAA, SDG and COP21 Outcome Document Vision and Words with
Action Agenda by 2030 – Part 2
His Excellency Mr. Andrej Logar, Chairperson of
the 70th General Assembly Second Committee and Permanent Representative of
Slovenia to the United Nations, is convening informal
consultations with NGOs in consultative status with ECOSOC on the agenda and work of the
Second Committee on 22 October 2015, from 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM in Conference
Room 2, at the United Nations Headquarters. A summary of the proceedings
will then be made available to Member States in advance of the draft GA
resolutions to be tabled later this month to be negotiated in November &
December.
The NGO consultations will follow a consultation
among Member States scheduled for Friday, 9 October, 3 - 6 pm, where they
discussed how the methods of work of the
GA Second Committee may be harmonized with the objectives of the 2030 Agenda,
together with the agendas of ECOSOC and GA Third Committee, to eliminate
overlaps and duplication. Based upon the results of the Member States
consultation on 9 October, a discussion paper by DESA will be prepared in
preparation for the consultation with ECOSOC NGOs on 22 October.
This innovative step in the Second
Committee represents a unique opportunity for civil society to share its
distinctive perspective and concrete inputs to Member States’ deliberations on
the Committee’s agenda and work in order
to better respond to the challenges of implementing the Agenda 2030 for
Sustainable Development.
This nomination process seeks candidates
as speakers to address either of the following questions:
1. How can the Second Committee ensure that
its work is in line with the objectives of the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development?
2. How should the agenda of the Second
Committee look like in the coming years?
A Call has also been made to interested persons to provide
brief and concrete written contributions, which will be posted on CSONet. We
prepared Part 1 in response to the Call and in time for consideration at the 9
October meeting and we started by expanding the Questions:
Expanded Questions
addressed in Part 1
1.
How can the Methods
of Work of the GA Second Committee be effectively Aligned and Harmonized with
the objectives of AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, together with the Agendas
of ECOSOC and all remaining GA Committees – 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 to eliminate overlap
and duplication?
2.
How should the
Agendas of ECOSOC and GA Committees 1 – 6 look like in the coming years 2016 –
2030?
This Part 2 has been prepared for consideration at the
Wednesday meeting of 14 October 2014, based on additional information available
to us. The Two Papers can help enrich the work of GA Second Committee and other
Village to Global Stakeholders towards achieving increasing convergence between
revised AAAA, revised SDG and COP21 Outcome Document Vision Intention and
Reality in each Community in each Local Government in each of the 193 Member
States.
Outcome 9 October
2015 Meeting
UN Member States discussed aligning the work of the UN
General Assembly's (UNGA) Second Committee (Economic and Financial) with the
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, during a meeting on the Committee's
methods of work. Delegations are invited to submit further, written proposals
on the Committee's work and the revitalization of its agenda by 23 October
2015.
Opening the meeting on 9 October 2015, in New York,
US, Andrej Logar (Slovenia), Second Committee Chair, recalled guidelines
adopted in UNGA Decision 65/530, to make draft resolutions more concise, focused, and action-oriented, as well as a resolution
calling for work toward biennialization,
triennialization, clustering and elimination of items on the agenda of the UNGA
itself. Logar also stressed the need to promote complementarity and ensure the Second Committee's work is fully
aligned with the "integrated vision of" the 2030 Agenda and the
Addis Ababa Action Agenda (AAAA). He asked Member States whether the current structure of the Committee's agenda
supports the three pillars of sustainable development, whether it covers the main aspects of the 2030 Agenda,
whether sustainable development could
become the framework for the (Committee’s) agenda, and how the Committee should conduct
its work in relation with the UN
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), the Third Committee (Social, Humanitarian and Cultural), and the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable
Development (HLPF).
Comment
This underlines urgent need to answer revised AAAA,
revised SDG and COP21 Outcome Document How questions.
Delegates generally agreed: that the work of the
Committee should be built on the priorities set by the 2030 Agenda, the AAAA,
the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) 2015-2030, and the
programmes of actions of countries in vulnerable situations; not to amend the
work of the Committee now, but to engage in an in-depth discussion; and to
discuss how other Committees and the HLPF will complement the Second Committee's
work on implementing the 2030 Agenda.
Comment
This is a contradictory position. To effectively build
the Committee’s work on the priorities set by 2030 Agenda, AAAA and DRR
Framework, as agreed by Delegates, once more underlines urgent need to answer
revised AAAA, revised SDG and COP21 Outcome Document How questions. However not
to amend the work of the Committee now while simultaneously seeking to build
the Committee’s work on the priorities set by 2030 Agenda, AAAA and DRR
Framework, is to hinder the Committee from delivery on assigned
responsibilities as recommended by practical and purposeful answer to revised
AAAA, revised SDG and COP21 Outcome Documents How questions. This obvious contradiction
needs to be immediately removed, if effort to address above important points
made by Logar and Delegates is not to be exercise in futility.
We have in Part 1 addressed many of these issues. In Part
2 our focus is on outstanding issues.
GA Committees
The GA currently has 6 Main Committees –
Disarmament and
International Security Committee (First Committee), Economic and Financial Committee
(Second Committee),
Social, Humanitarian and Cultural
Committee (Third
Committee), Special
Political and Decolonization Committee, (Fourth Committee) Administrative and Budgetary
Committee (Fifth
Committee), Legal Committee (Sixth Committee).
This
consultation is intended to help find ways and means of not only reorganizing
the work of the Second Committee but also ways and means of aligning and
harmonizing the work of the Second Committee with that of the Third Committee
for the purpose of helping to achieve increasing convergence between 2030
Agenda Vision Intention and Reality.
Our Study
finding is that for Best Results the reorganized work of the Second Committee
need to be aligned and harmonized with the work of all five remaining Main
Committees but should go further to be aligned and harmonized with the work of
six new Main Committees – Environmental Sustainability Committee (Seventh
Committee), Corruption and Service Delivery Committee (Eight Committee),
Monitoring and Evaluation Committee (Ninth Committee), Attitudinal and
Behavioural Change Committee (Tenth Committee), Transparency, Accountability,
Citizen and Stakeholder Participation Committee (Eleventh Committee) and Data
and Development Communication Committee (Twelfth Committee).
Common
Approach
In National and International Development Cooperation work, it is
interesting to find out how different people were using the same term, for what
purpose and with what effects. For example, Theory of Change is being used is
at least 3 overlapping ways – as a discourse to find out someone’s assumptions
about Change; as a tool that is rapidly rivalling the Log Frame and as an
Approach which will likely include the use of a tool. Also PCM – Project Cycle
Management, the most widely used Evaluation Approach is the World today has so
many versions but the Original Version is used by Only One Institution and it
has Clear 3 Principles, 3 Tools / Instruments corresponding to each Principle,
3 Practices and a Database.
We perceive that this probably is one of the reasons why the Synthesis
Report recommended One Worldwide Approach to AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document
etc. Without this Common Approach we cannot get Security and Diplomacy Right.
Without getting this Right we cannot get Development, Democracy, Elections,
Defense, Monitoring and Evaluation, Data etc Right. Without getting this Right
we cannot get Governance, Service Delivery, Performance Management Right.
Without getting this Right we cannot get Corruption, Hunger, Poverty,
Unemployment, Underemployment, Unemployability Right.
To get these Right first Time and all the Time, the One Worldwide
Approach needs to Drive Agriculture Revolution, Enterprise Revolution,
Government Revolution, Applied Research Revolution, Attitudinal and Behavioural
Change Revolution, Data Revolution and other Primary Revolutions that are Integral
Parts of Education Revolution, Health Revolution, Housing Revolution, Financial
Inclusion Revolution, Environment Revolution, Climate Change Revolution and
other Secondary Revolutions, that is all Action Agenda Items in revised AAAA,
revised SDG and COP21 Outcome Document.
There is urgent need to select this One Worldwide Approach without
delay.
Business
Unusual
The Synthesis Report also recommends Business Unusual Approach.
Operationalizing this in practice calls for Multi Stakeholders Platforms
covering all Sectors and Issues within revised AAAA, revised SDG and COP21
Outcome Document as well as Multidisciplinary Professionals Community of
Practice that Create Supply to meet Demand Created by Governments,
International Institutions and other Stakeholders.
However, while World Leaders, 193 Member States and UN Family Organization Executives are mouthing Business Unusual, they continue to ACT Business as Usual. As long as World Leaders, 193 Member States and UN Family Family Organization Executives do not Walk their Business Unusual Talk, it will be uphill Task seeking to achieve AAAA, SDG, COP21, Synthesis Report, Data Revolution Report, FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty Plan of Action Vision Ambitions in each Community in each Local Government in each of the 193 Member States and by 2030 Global Goals Target date.
Institutional
Architecture
The Part 1 focused on Development Architecture that needs to be
unbundled into:-
1.
New International
Political Architecture, including Global Platform for Collective Action for
Political Stability being responsibility of UNGA.
2.
New International
Development Architecture being responsibility of WBG.
3.
New International
Financial Architecture being responsibility of IMF.
4.
New International
Trade Architecture being responsibility of WTO
5.
Six Specific UN
Family Organization Members will be given responsibility for each of the
following New International Architecture – Cultural Architecture, Social
Architecture, Environment Architecture, Peace Architecture, Security
Architecture, Religious Architecture, Moral Architecture.
Africa NGOs’ Capacity Building Survey
As we
continue to reflect on our exchange of ideas with a US University that did a
2014 Survey on Africa NGOs’ Capacity Building, against the background of
contemporary events in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and World, we do not
know if the Survey Report included most of our ideas and suggestions. It is
clear that if these ideas and suggestions were accepted for implementation by
USAID, other Donors, Major US Foundations, other Major Foundations, Powerful
Governments – Developed or Developing; it could mark TURNING POINT in National
and International Development, in ways that strengthen common interest and
common future of Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and the World.
The Survey process provided evidence to
support the following facts:-
1.
It is
not that there is a lack of funding for NGOs’, it is that there is a lack of
access by domestic NGOs’ to adequate levels of funding on sustainable basis.
2.
It is
not that there is a lack of national and international development advocacy, it
is that there is a lack of the type of national and international development
advocacy adequate to help solve national and international development problems
on the ground from village to global levels, on both developed and developing
countries sides.
3.
It is
not that there is a lack of national and international development goals,
targets and indicators, it is that there is a lack of all relevant stakeholders
common definition of advocacy, goals, targets and indicators and a lack of
common approach by all national and international development stakeholders from
village to global levels, on both developed and developing countries sides to:
a) the research, planning, statistics / data, implementation, monitoring,
evaluation, transparency, accountability, citizens and stakeholders
participation of policy, program, project interventions towards achieving the
goals and targets. b) the learning and results from activities in (a) and c)
the advocacy driving CHANGE within activities in (a) and (b); in the all
stakeholders joint work towards achieving the commonly agreed goals and targets
as well as joint work to measure progress towards the goals and targets using
commonly agreed indicators.
4.
It is
not that there is a lack of good ideas and suggestions towards the solution to
real and complex national and international development problems on the ground
from village to global levels, on both developed and developing countries
sides, it is that there is a lack of Political Will to meaningfully involve all
individuals and institutions whose ideas and suggestions are included in survey
/ study / consultation / conference reports in the implementation as well as
the monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of their ideas and
suggestions that have been included in survey / study / consultation /
conference report recommendations.
The New End Hunger and Poverty, NEHAP Model
we have developed ensures that all relevant national and international
development stakeholders at each level from village / community to global /
world; are working jointly based on agreed common definitions of advocacy, true
development, goals, targets and
indicators towards the solutions to real problems on the ground within (1) - (4) above.
The Task to get all relevant stakeholders
at each level from village / community to global / world to work together and
benefit together, based on agreed common definitions of advocacy, true
development, goals, targets and indicators towards the solutions to real
problems on the ground within (1) - (4)
above, was not done in the past and that explains the shift from Aid delivery
through Government Agencies to Aid delivery through NGOs’. The Task is not
currently being done and that explains the shift from Aid delivery through
NGOs’ to Aid delivery through Communities. Should the Task remain undone, the
probability of successfully delivering Aid through Communities succeeding where
past and current effort at delivering Aid through Government Agencies and NGOs’
failed, is Low.
If the Task is to be done and to succeed in
delivering Aid through Communities, an All Inclusive, All Embracing and
Ambitious Model, such as NEHAP Model, that meaningfully involves: all
governments on both developed and developing countries sides; all relevant
Political Groupings in the International System and all relevant International
Institutions, particularly IMF, World Bank Group and All UN Agencies, needs to
be Designed and Delivered. Our Model is probably the most advance such Model
available anywhere in our World today.
There is
high probability that the most important findings of this Survey are:-
1.
Building
NGO Capacity on successful and sustainable basis greatly depends on
simultaneously building capacity of other relevant Stakeholders: Donors,
Governments, Media, Universities, Communities etc.
2.
Capacity
Building in (1) is on 3 levels. Level 1: Individual – Hard Competencies:
Learning and Skills and Soft Competencies: Character, Courage and Mindset. Level
2: Institution – Manpower; Machines, Equipment, Transport, Technology;
Management that support Individuals to deploy their Competences towards
achieving Institution Vision, Mission and Mandate. Level 3: Society – Political
& Cultural, Economic & Financial, Social & Environmental and
Religious and Moral Space required for Individuals and Institutions to Thrive
on Chaos.
3.
Capacity
Building in (2) on successful and sustainable basis greatly depends on
identifying, promoting and protecting: Network of Researchers like Matt the US
academic in the Survey, who are Strategic Thinkers with demonstrated capacity
to identify real challenges on the ground and come up with adequate Technical
and Political Solutions and Network of Practitioners like Lanre, who are Reform
Minds with demonstrated capacity for Diagnosis, Prescription, Surgery and
Recovery Management Processes that help all relevant Stakeholders to JOINTLY
identify problems, find Technical and Political Solutions, implement the
Solutions and Monitor and Evaluate this implementation.
Implementing
Study / Conference Report Recommendations – Root Problems
ISPE / EAG have identified that flaws and
failures implementing Sound Recommendations set out in Study Reports;
Conference Reports; Parliamentary Committee Reports; Regulatory Agency Reports,
arise from the following Root Problems:-
1.
Lack of National and International Development
Cooperation Approach as Robust as 3PCM Approach.
2.
Lack of National and International Development
Cooperation Stakeholder Groups Platform as robust as NEHAP Platform
3.
Lack of National and International Development
Cooperation Service Providers Consortium Partnership as Robust as NEHAP
Partnership / Master MSP and MSPs’
4.
Lack of National and International Development
Cooperation Stakeholder Groups Advocacy as robust as NEHAP Campaigns
5.
Lack of Movement for Positive Development Change
Driving National and Global Collective ACTION as Robust as NEHAP Revolutions.
6.
Lack of National and International Development
Cooperation Statutory Regulatory Agencies as Robust as Statutory Regulatory
Agencies suggested in NEHAP Initiative.
7.
Lack of Neighbourhood to Global Institutional
Architecture for all relevant National and International Development
Cooperation Stakeholder Groups suggested in NEHAP Initiative.
Select
National and International Development Cooperation Root Problems
1.
Mistrust among
Stakeholders
2.
Disproportionate
Benefits going to Powerful Partners
3.
Weak Capacity
Building
4.
We and They Silos
5.
Poor UN Funding. UN
Funding less than half of NY State Funding.
6.
Corrupt War on
Corruption. Corruption in Nigeria is child’s play compared to corruption in NY
State alone yet Nigeria is Demonized while US is celebrated. Yes Nigeria is
high on Bribe Takers Index but US, UK< France, Germany, Russia are high on
Bribe Payers Index. Corruption should be vigorously tackled in both Bribe Taking
and Bribe Paying Countries. Also World Governance Indicators including those of
WBG are Corrupt.
7.
Globalization as
Force for evil should give way to Globalization as Force for Good.
8.
World Leaders
endorsement of AAAA and SDG with full knowledge that How questions remain
unanswered.
Common Definition
The
increasing poverty levels in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and World is a
Scar on the Conscience of Researchers in Top Universities across the World,
particularly in G8 Countries. To remove this Scar, Researchers in these
Universities as well as in Universities in each of the 193 Member States need
to shift focus away from academic research aimed at advancing the frontiers of
knowledge to academic research aimed at institutionalizing true development. To
achieve this, there is a need for all relevant Stakeholders on National and
International State Actors and Non State Actors sides to have common agreement
on the definition of Advocacy, True Development, Development Research, Goals,
Targets and Indicators within revised AAAA, revised SDG and COP21 Outcome
Document.
We suggest: Advocacy is the set of strategies and activities designed and
delivered to influence: specific government, particularly the executive and
legislative arms, in a specific country (for example Local Government, State
Government or National Government in Nigeria) or specific Political Grouping of
Countries, including the legislative arm where it exists, in a specific
Sub-region e.g. ECOWAS; Region / Continent e.g. Africa Union; Global / World
e.g. G20, to take particular decision, fully implement the decision and
effectively monitor and evaluate the implementation to ensure increasing
convergence between decision intention and reality.
Advocacy is the set of strategies and activities designed
and delivered to influence: specific individual, institution or society to move
from an undesired state to a desired state and to remain in this desired state.
Should realities on the ground demand that the desired state be changed to a
more desired state, this will be done on continuing basis.
True Development must mean the development of man – the
unfolding and realization of his creative potential enabling him to improve his
material conditions and living through the use of resources available to him.
It is a process by which man’s personality is enhanced and it is that enhanced
personality – creative, organized and disciplined which is the MOVING FORCE behind the socio economic
TRANSFORMATION of Society. It is clear that development does not start with
goods and things, it starts with people, their orientation, organization and
discipline. When the accent on development is on things, all human resources
remain latent, untapped potential and a Society can be poor amidst the most
opulent of material resources. On the contrary, where a Society is properly
oriented, organized and disciplined, it can be prosperous on the scantiest
basis of natural wealth.
For Development to qualify as True
Development, it must be
all round, well balanced, progressive and self sustaining: all individual
aspects must be mutually reinforcing. True Development has to be multi
sectoral, multi disciplinary and multi dimensional. True Development is much
more than provision of road, electricity, water, communication facilities,
education and health facilities among others; however important all these may
be.
True Development must include the exploitation of all
available resources for the maximum good, vast improvement in a peoples’ self
reliance and self reassurance in their creative and managerial ability, in
their productivity and production, particularly of the goods and services
needed by the majority to improve the quality of their lives; vast and rapid
qualitative and quantitative improvement in their individual and collective
security and welfare and in their socio cultural and socio political
development in the installation of a more democratic, egalitarian, civil and
civilized society amongst others.
True Development must embrace every aspect of a peoples’
life – political, economic, social. The reason is that these are interconnected
and interdependent. An Individual cannot want to move forward economically
without first of all having the political base for moving forward economically.
An Individual cannot want to move forward socially without having the political
and economic base to move forward socially. So if the relevant authorities –
national and international, pay attention to one while leaving the other, these
authorities will be deceiving themselves while increasing the avoidable pain
and misery of these Individuals, with ultimate catastrophic consequences for
Citizens in both Rich and Poor Countries in our World today.
Development
Research
- Turning Development Researchers into Policy / Program Entrepreneurs or
Monitoring and Evaluation Entrepreneurs and turning Research Institutions into
Policy / Program focused Think Tank or Monitoring and Evaluation focused Think
Tank is not easy because it involves fundamental re-orientation, organization
and discipline towards Policy / Program engagement or Monitoring and Evaluation
engagement, rather than academic achievement; engaging much more vigorously
with Policy / Program Community or Monitoring and Evaluation Community; Developing a Research
Agenda focusing on Policy / Program or Monitoring and Evaluation issues rather
than academic interests; acquiring new skills or building multidisciplinary
teams; establishing new internal systems and incentives and spending much more
on Communicating effectively with all stakeholders – family, community,
business, banks, governments and international community.
This
should include Constructive Dialogue before, during and after the
Research itself; producing appropriate Communication for Development Change,
Economic Change, Social Change and Cultural Change products for each audience,
at the right time and working more in effective partnerships – networks,
coalitions and consortia. It also involves looking at a radically different
funding model. For example, one that restores, the lost glory of cooperatives.
To
effectively influence Policy / Program or Monitoring and Evaluation Decision
Makers in all concerned stakeholder communities; Researchers need additional
skills. Development Researchers need to be politically influential, able to
understand the politics, the economics, the sociology and culture and the time
and identify the key players. They need to be good storytellers; to synergize
simple compelling stories from results of the research (not spin doctors who
publicize falsehood). They need to be good networkers; to work effectively with
all other concerned stakeholders and they need to be good social engineers to
build Shared Vision initiatives that pulls all of these together or they need
to work on multidisciplinary teams with others who have these necessary skills.
This feature of the NEHAP Model / NEHAP Initiative / 3PCM Approach helps to
achieve this and much more.
We can also share our suggestions on common
definition of goals, targets and indicators’.
About
ISPE / EAG
Lanre and
colleagues have for over twenty years made great sacrifices, demonstrated
uncommon zeal and exceptional patriotism in continuing constructive engagement
of relevant sub-national, national and international stakeholders, to jointly
focus on comprehensive systemic solutions to our real and complex national
political, economic, social, security, cultural and religious problems on the
ground.
In this period
we have been working spiritedly towards helping to make Nigeria, Africa, UK,
Europe, US and World Hunger and Poverty history and in record time. In this
period also, our Lanre Rotimi (Nigerian) and Dr. Hellmut Eggers (German) have
created 3PCM, Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management Approach to Benefits
focused National and International Development Cooperation – the most advance
such Approach in our World today. 3PCM has been tried and tested, the Biggest
Test so far in NIPOST 2000 – 2001.
3PCM uses
Living Strategy or Communication Strategy and so it is Dynamic and continuing
to improve daily. Glorious Heights reached by NIPOST at the time has NEVER been
equalled even when NIPOST later received Technical Support from Netherlands /
Dutch Postal Administration. We have built considerable expertise, experience
and exposure in Nigeria, UK and EC that bring Whole of Nigeria, Africa, UK,
Europe, US and World Thinking to bear in finding practical solutions to all
identified complex systemic problems in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and
World, fully implementing the solutions and effectively monitoring and
evaluating this implementation in ways that achieve increasing convergence
between National and Global Development Cooperation Goals and Targets Intention
and Reality and on scheduled dates.
International
Society for Poverty Elimination, ISPE, Volunteer Organization, is a Member of
Economic Alliance Group, EAG. EAG has the following additional Members:-
1.
AR & Associates Limited, Strategy and
Development Cooperation Consulting Firm – Research, Planning, Statistics,
Implementation, Monitoring, Evaluation, Assessment, Learning, Results,
Advocacy.
2.
EAG - CLEAR, Centre for Learning in Evaluation
and Results, Evaluation Organization
3.
EAG - CDPM, Centre for Development Policy
Management, Research Organization
4.
EAG – FTS / FFS, Farmers Training School / Farmer
Field School, Food and Agriculture Organization
5.
EAG – ETS / EFS, Enterprise Training School /
Enterprise Field School, Entrepreneurship Development Organization
6.
EAG – PSA / PSE – Public Service Academy / Public
Service Exchange, Public Administration Organization
EAG is neutral
in promoting and protecting Sub-national, National and International
Development Cooperation. EAG work towards supporting Developed Countries
Governments; Developing Countries Governments; International Institutions /
International Foundations / Donors; Organized Communities – Neighbourhood to
Global; Media – National and International to JOINTLY Build National and Global
Collective ACTION for achieving Increasing Convergence between National and
Global Development Cooperation Goals and Targets Intention and Reality and on
schedule dates.
The core
business of the Group is the provision of Services for Strategic Management of
Complex National or International or both National and International
Development Change Processes under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial
Services Arrangement.
AR has been in
business since 1993 but registered in Nigeria in 1995. ISPE has been
in business operating as Economic Alliance International (EAI) since 2002 but
registered in Nigeria in 2007. EAG – CLEAR;
EAG – CDPM; EAG – FTS; EAG – ETS; EAG – PSA are for now domiciled in AR.
EAG has in the
past 20 years spent over US$2 Million (N300 Million) to Develop the 3PCM
Approach as well as its National and Global Development Cooperation Practical
Solutions under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial Services Arrangement
within which we provided the Nigeria Federal Government alone Consultancy
Services worth over UK Pounds 10 Million (N2.5 Billion) Free of Charge. This is
Evidence that we do not have purely Commercial Interest but are Motivated by
Service to Humanity as the Best Work of Life, hence two of our Slogans – Let Us
Work Together to Benefit Together and …Building a Brighter Future as we
Configure our World.
Conclusion
Sustainable Solutions to Poverty, Hunger,
Climate Change, Environmental Degradation and related problems including
Corruption and Terrorism on the ground in Developed and Developing Countries
exist. Ability to successfully implement these solutions with effective
monitoring and evaluation of this implementation exist or can be acquired.
However, the Big Challenge is the Willingness to successfully implement these
solutions with effective monitoring and evaluation of this implementation.
Tackling this Big Challenge is essentially issue of Changing Attitude and
Behaviour at Scale that the ongoing consultations to find answer to AAAA, SDG
and COP21 Outcome Document How questions need to effectively address and in
ways that meaningfully connect each Community in each Local Government in each
of the 193 Member States to UN Headquarters.
The Roadmap to Paris will be more
productive and result oriented if Structured and Organized produce COP21
Outcome Document that is Vision and Words with Action thus avoiding Error in
AAAA and SDG and in ways that effectively address overarching Goals of Poverty Elimination and
Environmental Sustainability from the Dimensions
of Trade, Aid, Debts and Corruption with focus on Level 1. Implementation Solutions Level 2. Follow Up and Review Solutions Level 3. Capacity Building – Individual
Level - Hard Competences: Learning and Skills and Soft Competences:
Character, Courage and Mindset; Institution
Level – Resources and Processes empowering the Individual to deploy
Competences towards achieving Corporate Goals and Environment Level – Political, Economic, Social, Cultural, Security
and Religious Space for Institutions and Individuals to Thrive on Chaos,
CommWSDS as well as Communication for WSDS.
There is a need to create a Six new GA
Committees, Master MSP and complimentary MSPs’, Multidisciplinary CoPs’,
Multiple Institutional Architecture etc within One Worldwide Approach. There is
a need to appreciate that UN, WBG, IMF, 193 Member States Governments and
Partners need Technical Support from Consultant with required Competences that
can help each of the AAAA, SDG and COP21 Outcome Document Stakeholders
Stake-holders to correctly identify where they are now (A); where they need to
be to achieve AAAA, SDG and COP21 Outcome Document Goals and Targets by 2030 (B)
and How to move from (A) to (B).
The Bright Prospects of Success
implementing revised AAAA, revised SDG and COP21 Outcome Document could be
squandered if the needful is not done on time. This is because all necessary
arrangements to identify and fill gaps in AAAA and SDG; prevent such gaps in
COP21 Outcome Document and press forward to fully implement revised AAAA,
revised SDG and COP21 Outcome Document and effectively monitor and evaluate
this implementation from Village to Global levels in each of the 193 Member
States to achieve Global Goals Targets by 2030 cannot be left to happen on
their own but need to be discussed, negotiated and established and without
delay.
The ultimate consequences of failure to
achieve 2030 Agenda Targets in each of the 193 Member States could be
catastrophic. This is avoidable should World Leaders take positive Action on
ideas and suggestions set out in Paper 1, Paper 2 and supporting documents –
available upon request.
We are willing to offer a more detailed
information / clarification as directed by GA Second Committee and or other
relevant UN Authority.
Contact:
Director General
International
Society for Poverty Elimination / Economic Alliance Group
5, Moses Orimolade
Avenue,
Ijapo Estate,
Akure, Ondo State,
Nigeria.
M: +234-8162469805
Email: nehap.initiative@yahoo.co.uk 14 October 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment