ISPE EAG
INTERATIONAL
SOCIETY FOR POVERTY ELIMINATION ECONOMIC
ALLIANCE GROUP
Achieving AAAA, SDG and COP21 Outcome Document Vision and Words with
Action Agenda by 2030 in 193 Member States – Part 3
His Excellency Mr. Andrej Logar, Chairperson of
the 70th General Assembly Second Committee and Permanent Representative of
Slovenia to the United Nations, is convening informal
consultations with NGOs in consultative status with ECOSOC on the agenda and work of the
Second Committee on 22 October 2015, from 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM in Conference
Room 2, at the United Nations Headquarters. A summary of the proceedings
will then be made available to Member States in advance of the draft GA
resolutions to be tabled later this month to be negotiated in November &
December.
The NGO consultations will follow a consultation
among Member States scheduled for Friday, 9 October, 3 - 6 pm, where they
discussed how the methods of work of the
GA Second Committee may be harmonized with the objectives of the 2030 Agenda,
together with the agendas of ECOSOC and GA Third Committee, to eliminate
overlaps and duplication. Based upon the results of the Member States
consultation on 9 October, a discussion paper by DESA will be prepared in
preparation for the consultation with ECOSOC NGOs on 22 October.
This innovative step in the Second
Committee represents a unique opportunity for civil society to share its
distinctive perspective and concrete inputs to Member States’ deliberations on
the Committee’s agenda and work in order
to better respond to the challenges of implementing the Agenda 2030 for
Sustainable Development.
This nomination process seeks candidates
as speakers to address either of the following questions:
1. How can the Second Committee ensure that
its work is in line with the objectives of the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development?
2. How should the agenda of the Second
Committee look like in the coming years?
A Call has also been made to interested persons to provide
brief and concrete written contributions, which will be posted on CSONet. We
prepared Part 1 in response to the Call and in time for consideration at the 9
October meeting and we started by expanding the Questions:
Expanded Questions
addressed in Part 1
1.
How can the Methods
of Work of the GA Second Committee be effectively Aligned and Harmonized with
the objectives of AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, together with the Agendas
of ECOSOC and all remaining GA Committees – 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 to eliminate overlap
and duplication?
2.
How should the Agendas
of ECOSOC and GA Committees 1 – 6 look like in the coming years 2016 – 2030?
We prepared Part 2 for consideration at the Wednesday meeting
of 14 October 2014, based on additional information available to us. We are
following up with Part 3. The Three Papers can help enrich the work of GA
Second Committee and other Village to Global Stakeholders towards achieving
increasing convergence between revised AAAA, revised SDG and COP21 Outcome
Document Vision Intention and Reality in each Community in each Local
Government in each of the 193 Member States that is Interlinked, Interconnected
and Interdependent with work towards achieving increasing convergence between
Agenda 21, UNSDS 2015 Outcome Document, Synthesis Report, Data Revolution
Report, World Development Report of the World Bank Group - WDR 2004 (Public
Sector Management, PSM), WDR 2008 (Agriculture), WBG New PSM (2011), WDR 2014
(Risk Management), WDR 2015 (Attitudinal and Behavioural Change), FAO
Conference on Hunger and Poverty Program of Action 1995 etc Vision Intention
and Reality in each Community in each Local Government in each of the 193
Member States.
Outcome UNSDS 2015
World Leaders adopted the SDG at the Summit. The 6
Interactive Dialogues intended to help 193 Member States answer SDG How questions
ended up working HARDER doing the same old things in the same old ways and
getting the same old results – more answers to SDG What and Why questions and
no answer to SDG How questions.
The Summit needed to have worked SMARTer doing new
things in new ways to get new results. ISPE / EAG is probably the only
Organization that made practical submissions on ways and means of finding
answer to SDG How questions, fully implementing these answers with effective
monitoring and evaluation of this implementation in each Community in each
Local Government in each of the 193 Member States.
At the Agenda's adoption, several high-level representatives
and celebrities noted that commitments are not enough, even though they are a
necessary step to solutions, and emphasized the need to go beyond political
will.
Heads of State and Government and other high-level officials
made broad statements of support for the new agenda, such as the US' commitment
to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and noting this will
require addressing “bad governance,” inequality including women's rights, and
climate change. More specifically, leaders announced commitments belonging to
three broad categories: financial commitments; commitments related to national
planning processes and implementation; and commitments related to specific
areas covered by the 2030 Agenda.
Leaders also outlined specific commitments on
anti-corruption, education, humanitarian aid, ending hunger and achieving food
security and improved nutrition, health, infrastructure, and youth.
Now that the
commitments have been made, at both the collective global level, and the
individual national level, the critical question is: will these commitments
lead to implementation and make a difference for people, planet, prosperity,
partnerships and peace, in the “five Ps” of the Agenda? Will they make a
difference in the lives of elders, men, women, youth and children – over 4
billion worldwide: who suffer, struggle and live and strive to overcome
absolute poverty and chronic poverty?
The translation of
commitments into practice, and their ability to make a real difference on the
ground, will depend on various factors, especially political will and
leadership, ownership, financing, capacity, data availability and quality,
transparency, inclusiveness and accountability. In the view of Abhijit
Banerjee, the keynote speaker for this year's session of the UN General
Assembly Second Committee (Economic and Financial), translating the Agenda into
impact depends not only on financial resources but also on the “intellectual
space” and capacity of countries and institutions to innovate, which includes
creating simple but low-cost initiatives that increase the impact of
pre-existing programmes and projects. If the plethora of ideas presented by
government leaders for the three-day Summit in New York in September 2015 is an
indication, the Agenda may get off to a good start.
However, this good
start will turn to FLUKE should relevant UN Family Organization and 193 Member
States authorities downplay the fact that the endorsed AAAA and SDG is
currently Vision and Words without Action; that converting these into Vision
and Words with Action demand urgent answer to AAAA and SDG How questions and
that errors made in the AAAA and SDG Processes are not repeated in COP21
Process hence need for Roadmap to Paris that correct all flaws and failures in
AAAA and SDG while delivering COP21 Outcome Document that is Vision and Words
with Action.
GA Second
Committee and remaining Eleven GA Committees – Central Role
The GA currently has 6 Main Committees –
Disarmament and
International Security Committee (First Committee), Economic and Financial Committee
(Second Committee),
Social, Humanitarian and Cultural
Committee (Third
Committee), Special
Political and Decolonization Committee, (Fourth Committee) Administrative and Budgetary
Committee (Fifth
Committee), Legal Committee (Sixth
Committee).
We have
in Part 2 suggested need to create six new Main Committees – Environmental
Sustainability Committee (Seventh Committee), Corruption and Service Delivery Committee (Eight Committee), Monitoring and Evaluation Committee (Ninth Committee), Attitudinal and Behavioural Change Committee (Tenth Committee), Transparency, Accountability, Citizen and Stakeholder Participation
Committee (Eleventh
Committee) and Data and Development
Communication Committee (Twelfth Committee) and that the work of all 12 Committees need to be aligned and
harmonized.
The
dialogue below underline need to fully involve the above 12 GA Committees in
the Design and Delivery of Policy, Program, Project Interventions, 3PIs and
3PIs Training as One within each Action Agenda Item in revised AAAA, revised
SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21, UNSDS 2015 Outcome Document, Synthesis
Report, Data Revolution Report, World Development Report of the World Bank
Group - WDR 2004 (Public Sector Management, PSM), WDR 2008 (Agriculture), WBG
New PSM (2011), WDR 2014 (Risk Management), WDR 2015 (Attitudinal and
Behavioural Change), FAO Conference on Hunger and Poverty Program of Action
1995 etc in each Community in each Local Government in each of the 193 Member
States.
In
response to The World Centre for Sustainable Development, WCSD, Rio + Centre Blog Post on the Topic Countdown Day 17 – SDG
1: No Poverty, we made the following comment on 28 September 2015:
If
UNSDS 2015 is to be Effective Action and Not Empty Talk, then UNSDS Outcome
Document should demonstrate and be seen to demonstrate shift from talking and
thinking to solutions and action.
To help ensure
that this shift occurs, we suggest WCSD undertake critical review of the article -
Should WCSD
assessment confirm that indeed the article has many good ideas and pertinent
suggestions, which adopted by UNGA can help achieve increasing convergence
between SDG Vision and Words with Action Intention and Reality in each
Community in each Local Government in each of 193 Member States, we suggest
WCSD consider taking the following specific action steps:-
1.
Endorse
the article and request UNNGLS to circulate the endorsed article to all World
Leaders, 193 Member States and other Participants attending 28 September
meeting.
2.
Underline
need for Integrated Sustainable Solutions – Political Solutions, Cultural
Solutions, Economic Solutions, Financial Solutions, Social Solutions,
Environment Solutions, Peace Solutions, Security Solutions, Religious Solutions
and Moral Solutions; to Design and Delivery of each Action Agenda Item in AAAA
and SDG applicable to specific Village to Global location context.
3.
Urge
all World Leaders, 193 member States and other Participants attending 28
September meeting to recognize that Political Solutions is Master Key to
unlocking remaining 9 Integrated Sustainable Solutions.
4.
Urge
UNGA to pass resolution calling on each of the 193 Member States to adopt
recommendations in the article and go further to establish immediately National
Integrated Economic Reform Program, NIEReP for the implementation and
evaluation of domesticated AAAA and SDG Vision and Words with Action, aligned
with National Development Plan through National Reform Bureau working with
Reform Implementation Unit in each Ministry, Department and Agency, whose
activities are coordinated by Steering Committee on Reform and National Council
on Reform within complimentary Sub-national, National, Sub-regional, Regional
and Global Master Multi Stakeholder Partnership Platforms.
There are Bright Prospects of success, if the right thing is done at the right time.
There are Bright Prospects of success, if the right thing is done at the right time.
WCDS, Rio +
Centre response 15 October 2015: We agree in this era change is only possible
when everyone is involved. You are playing a key role in advancing the poverty
agenda and constructive input can only enrich common goals. We encourage your
continued contributions in order to shape our future.
Also in
response to The World Centre for Sustainable Development, WCSD, Rio +
Centre Blog Post on the Topic Countdown Started
- SDG 17: Partnership for the Goals, we made the following comments on 23 and
24 September 2015:
It
is interesting that we are the first to comment since this Post on 9 September.
We are concerned that AAAA and SDG is each Vision and Words without Action;
that AAAA did not answer How questions yet it is the Pillar of SDG MoI. We are
more concerned that UNSDS has been scheduled to seek answer to SDG How
questions in 6 interactive dialogues that would then feed into SDG that would
be endorsed by World Leaders 28 – 30 September.
Is
it realistic to expect that answer to SDG How questions that were not found in
9 months can be found in 3 days? Can SDG endorsed based on forced or failed
answer to How questions succeed on sustainable basis? Why the RUSH to endorse
SDG that is Vision and Words without Action and that put cart before horse?
Is
it not in Global Interest to kick start fair answer to SDG How questions with
UNSDS and continue the Global Dialogue in ways that establish effective Link
between each Community in each of 193 Member States and UN Headquarters to
arrive at fair answer to SDG How questions that World Leaders can now endorse
November or December 2015?
Is
achieving increasing convergence between WCSD Vision intention and reality not
dependent on effectively addressing all points raised in Twitter Advocacy
#DPINGO, #post2015, #speakerconf?
Can
inequality and other issues of importance to WCSD be effectively addressed when
UN Entities including UNSDN are not serious and not sincere in addressing “For
Inclusion. For Equality. For People. 2015 – Time for Global Action” campaign
issues as evidenced by UNSDN refusal to publish our Post simply because it is
too blisteringly truthful? Will you also do the same by blocking this Post? or
take corrective steps by getting UNSDN and relevant UN Family Organization
authorities to do the Right Thing and on time?
WCSD,
Rio + Centre Response 15 October 2015: The concept of Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs) was proposed for the first time during the Rio+20
Conference in 2012. After months of global consultations and negotiations the
SDGs, or global goals, were framed and intended to replace the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs). This work was undertaken and finalized at the end of
the MDGs and in combination with the General Assembly which was the optimal
time for presentation and adoption of the SDGs. This brings continuity for long
term development and guidance to our Sustainable Development for the next 15
years. We recognize that as in any human enterprise nothing is perfect,
especially on a global scale, but the SDGs do provide a clear direction for
future development. In countries, landing the SDGs will be more aligned with
national priorities and that gives flexibility to countries to act. In terms of
implementation, even if the AAAA was perfect, SDGs implementation would still
require strong political commitment from both government and people. This
ongoing dialogue and consultation should continue to help countries implement
the SDGs. Your organization can play a key role.
Leading
to UNSDS focusing on answer to SDG How questions starting tomorrow, there are
so many fundamental issues to be addressed, it is not possible to arrive at
fair answer to SDG How questions. Global Policy Watch in its latest Report
Partnership Funding within the UN System raise many interesting points that
coincide with our position on this matter.
Please
find link to ISPE / EAG Policy Briefing #8 in which we have called on World
Leaders to postpone endorsement of SDG by 3 months to allow for fair answer to
SDG How questions through Global Dialogue leading to adoption of SDG that is
Vision and Words with Action by November or December 2015.
The
Blog include link to the Global Policy Watch Report.
We
have raised serious issues of serious business demanding the serious attention
of WCSD, UN Family Organization including WBG and IMF, 194 Member States, CSOs’
and Partners.
It
is in Global Interest that endorsement of SDG is postponed to November or
December 2015. The bright prospects of success could be squandered should World
Leaders adopt SDG that is Vision and Words without Action based on forced or
failed answer to SDG How questions..
God
Bless UN Family Organization.
WCSD, Rio + Centre Response 15 October
2015 : The timing of approving the SDGs should be linked to the SG
assembly agenda. This timing takes advantage of having all world leaders
together at the assembly. It is nearly impossible to have all world leaders
meet twice a year and this meeting will be an opportunity to deal with
logistics issues. The hard work of drafting this agenda has already been a long
process, starting in March 2013 and finishing in August 2015. Presentation of the
SDGs in connection with the SG assembly agenda will ensure the full
participation of all interested parties. Furthermore, timely
General Partnership – Multi Stakeholder Platforms, MSPs’.
We undertook Study finding
on Nature of Consortiums / Partnerships. The Partnership Models dug up in this Study
opened a can of worms. The Study highlighted the following points:-
1. Partnership Scorecard in
North: Few Good Partnerships, Many Flawed Partnerships, Many Failed
Partnerships.
2. If this is the level of
Partnership weaknesses - flaws and failures, in the North given Evidence
provided, one wonders what the situation is in the South. Partnership Scorecard
in South likely to be worse if a study on Partnerships is done in South
Countries.
3. Implication of (1) and
(2) is that if Study is done today MDG 8 – Develop of a Global Partnership for
Development, Scorecard for 2000 – 2014 likely to be Few Good Partnerships, Many
Flawed Partnerships, Many Failed Partnerships. SDG 17 Design does not appear to
have learnt any lessons from MDG 8 flaws and failures.
4. (1) and (2) underline
the need for appropriate Partnership Model for revised AAAA, revised SDG,
COP 21, Agenda 21 etc such as the type
of Partnership Model proposed by ISPE / EAG.
5. If Lessons Learnt are
Actually Learnt, then Building Bridge between Lessons Learnt and Lessons
Forgetting will Produce Scorecard in the next 5 years and beyond of many Good
Partnerships, Few Flawed Partnerships, Few Failed Partnerships.
The Study also highlighted
the issue of Donors entering into Partnership Agreements towards executing
their Assignments. This Study underlined need to separate between:-
a) Donor / International Institution / Government Agency Partnership
Agreement with individual Suppliers.
b) Donor / International Institution / Government Agency Partnership
Agreement with multiple Suppliers individually selected by it to work together
as a Team.
c) Donor / International Institution / Government Agency Partnership
Agreement with consortium of Suppliers Joined Up in a Single Bid, without any
contribution towards forming the consortium by it.
ISPE / EAG 2000 Study Report
Finding is that in the Nigeria Bureau of Public Enterprises – Government Agency
responsible for the National Privatization Program, the success rate with
Partnership Agreement (a) was High; Partnership Agreement (b) was Medium;
Partnership Agreement (c) was Low. 15 years later, Study finding today provide
evidence on Partnership Agreement (c) that coincides with the year 2000 Study
Report Finding.
Going by Common Definition
of Goals, Targets and Indicators set out in NEHAP Documents, MDG 8 is not a
Goal but an Indicator. The Target for this Indicator: Develop a Global
Partnership for Development, could have been Develop a Global Partnership for
Development by 2005 in each MDG Thematic Area Agenda Item such as the Thematic
Areas Agenda Items set out in ISPE / EAG War on Poverty Document.
This gives National and
Global MDG Stakeholders on Developed Countries, Developing Countries and
International Institutions sides, 5 years (2000 – 2005) to develop the
Partnerships and this in turn gives the Neighborhood to Global Partnerships 10
years (2005 – 2015) to help achieve all MDG Goals and Targets. The MDG Goals
are in reality 2 – Reduce Poverty and Reduce Environmental Degradation.
The intention of MDG 8, is
High Partnership Agreement (3), with or without above clarification. The
implication is that there is a need to examine select Models dug up such as the
Oxford University Model; On Think Tanks 10 Recommendations and the UK Cabinet
Office Models to see how their combined strengths could be increased and their
combined weaknesses could be reduced in ways that help achieve increasing
convergence between MDG 8 Intention and Reality. The NEHAP Pilot Program
supported by relevant National and International Development Cooperation
Stakeholders seek to nurture and grow such Consortium Partnership from
Neighborhood to Global levels through the Partnership Framework set out in this
Paper.
The probability of achieving
Goals and Targets of End Hunger and Poverty by 2025 and 2030 respectively or at
all or indeed any other International Development Cooperation Goals and Targets
on set date or at all, without Many Good Partnerships – Neighborhood to Global;
Partnership Agreement (c) is Low. SDG 17 needs to address this fundamental
issue if it is to succeed where MDG 8 failed.
The High Score in
Partnership Agreement (a) needs to be taken with caution, given the overall
International Development Cooperation Scorecard in the 1st 50 years
of International Development Cooperation (1960-2009) and 5 years into 2nd
50 years of International development Cooperation 2010-2059).
International
Development Cooperation Scorecard
The International Society for Poverty
Elimination (ISPE) /Economic Alliance Group (EAG), in Policy Briefing #8
highlight the findings of the first 50 years of the International
Development Cooperation Scorecard (1960-2009). The grades given for
Policy, Program, Project implementation were rated “1/3 ‘good’; 1/3 ‘flawed;’
and 1/3 ‘failed.’” Policy, Program, Project evaluations were rated similarly by
respondents as being 1/3 ‘good’; 1/3 ‘flawed;’ and 1/3 ‘failed.’”
Reflecting on the past six years,
during the second 50 years of International Development Cooperation (2010 –
2059), the ISPE/EAG senior officers conclude that lessons relating to
global Development Cooperation appear not to have been learned. The
Scorecard in 2015 remains essentially unchanged.
Leading up to the SDG Summit in
September 2015, the Briefing authors asserted that, unless “village to global stakeholders jointly agree to face new direction
and adopt new priorities” by “addressing all fundamental issues,” the same
scores may be repeated by the SDG 2030 target date, and possibly become skewed
more toward the ‘flawed’ and ‘failed’ sides by 2059 - the end of the second 50
years of International Development Cooperation. A ‘high risk’ planet and
people situation that is entirely preventable.
The Briefing authors main argument is
that if the SDG targets are to be met by 2030 then all stakeholders involved in
the implementation and evaluation of “domesticated SDGs in their respective
Community, Country or Region” need to ensure that the SDGs are aligned with
respective National Development Plans in each
of the 193 UN Member States. There
is, therefore, an urgent need for all
relevant “village to global stakeholders to jointly work by 2030 towards
achieving Scorecard grades that rate Policy, Program, Project implementation at
least at “90% ‘good’; and ideally less than 5% ‘flawed’ and 5% ‘failed.’ ”
Correspondingly, the grades given for
Policy, Program, Project evaluation should be at least at “90% ‘good’; and
ideally less than 5% ‘flawed’ and 5% ‘failed.’”
The key lies in building capacity and
enacting “transformative change” at local, national, regional and global
levels, guided by the UN: revised SDGs, revised AAAA and COP21 Outcome Document
indicators and corresponding criteria (2016- 2030). In
2015, the stage for global initiatives to promote "integrated approaches
to the interconnected economic, social and environmental challenges confronting
the world" has been set.
Now really is the time to for all
stakeholders “to jointly focus on building the triangular relationship between
health and nutrition, education and training, and enterprise and jobs aligned
with National Development Plans that turn SDG 'vision and words into
action' in each of the 193 UN Member States.”
Sustaining the planet and its people
for future generations depends without question on these global commitments.
Rights
Approach to Implementation and Evaluation of AAAA, SDG, COP21 Outcome Document
etc
It is encouraging that UN has taken a Rights
Approach to implementing revised AAAA, revised SDG, COP 21 Outcome Document,
Agenda 21 etc. It is disappointing that WBG has rejected a Rights Approach to
doing same. All UN Family Organization Members including WBG and IMF must take
Common Rights Approach to implementing and evaluating revised AAAA, revised
SDG, COP 21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc as first step in getting all 193
Member States and their National and International Development Cooperation
Partners to do the same. A Rights Approach and Value Orientation Approach are
Key Components of a Business Unusual Approach without which achieving revised
AAAA, revised SDG, COP 21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 Vision Ambitions in 193
Member States will be a Mirage.
Fighting and
Winning Wars and Battles
The Solutions to Root Problems in revised AAAA, revised SDG, COP21
Outcome Document, Agenda 21, Synthesis Report, Data Revolution Report, select
WDRs’ etc are:-
1.
Correct Consultative Research;
Diagnostic Studies; Prescription; Surgery and Recovery Management; CRDPSRM.
2.
Fight and Win War on Poverty,
Hunger, Disease and Environmental Degradation (PHDE) Battle Against Arrogance,
Ignorance, Indifference, Incompetence, Indiscipline, Injustice, Intolerance,
Insincerity, Inequality, Interference, Impunity and Corruption (A10IC).
Policy, Program, Project Interventions within
CRDPSRM, War on PHDE and Battles Against A9IC will be undertaken within 4
Initiatives:-
1.
Spiritual Initiative
a)
Spiritual Deliverance (Christian; Muslim;
Traditional; others as applicable in specific Community)
b)
Spiritual Development (Christian; Muslim;
Traditional; others as applicable in specific Community)
c)
Family Database (Christian; Muslim; Traditional;
others as applicable in specific Community)
2.
Anti Conflict Initiative
a)
Conflict Prevention
b)
Conflict Resolution
3.
Empowerment Initiative
a)
Economic Empowerment
b)
Political Empowerment
4.
Development Initiative
a)
Physical Development Master Plan
b)
Economic Development Master Plan
c)
Human Resources Development Master Plan
d)
Strategic Talent Management Database.
War on PHDE and Battles Against A10IC need to be fought and Won in
each Community from Neighbourhood to Global where the 25 Root Problems of
Community Economies as applicable and the 7 Root Problems of Implementing Study
Reports are tackled on successful and sustainable basis.
The War on Poverty in Nigeria, Africa, UK,
Europe, USA and rest of the World – War on PHDE and Battles Against A10IC can
be WON if relevant stakeholders
adopt New Priorities and face New Direction. Positive Change in this regard can
start from Citizens and Universities in both Developed and Developing Countries
across our World today.
In view of the above, there is a need for all who
genuinely believe that Dream of Nigeria, Africa and World without Poverty can
be a reality to join like minds in the establishment and operation of a Poverty
Elimination Platform focusing the MOVING
FORCE towards achieving needed TRANSFORMATION
from Village to Global levels in all Countries – Developed and Developing in
our World today.
To achieve this there must be:-
1.
Selection of Reform Adviser and Global
Coordinating Consultant to UNGA on Achieving revised AAAA, revised SDG, COP21
Outcome Document, Agenda 21, WDRs’ etc Vision and Words with Action Agenda by
2030 in 193 Member States.
2.
Selection of One Worldwide Approach to
implementation and evaluation of revised AAAA, revised SDG, COP21 Outcome Document,
Agenda 21, WDRs’ etc Policy, Program, Project Interventions, 3PIs and 3PIs
Training as One from Village to Global levels in each of the 193 Member States.
3.
Establishment of Master Multi Stakeholder
Platform, MSP and MSPs covering all Stakeholders in each Action Agenda Item in
revised AAAA, revised SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21, WDRs’ etc Policy,
Program, Project Interventions, 3PIs and 3PIs Training as One from Village to
Global levels in each of the 193 Member States. Each MSP will speak 6 UN Official
Languages.
4.
Establishment of Multidisciplinary Professionals
Community of Practice on Poverty Elimination and Environmental Sustainability
covering all Disciplines in each Action Agenda Item in revised AAAA, revised
SDG, COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21, WDRs’ etc Policy, Program, Project
Interventions, 3PIs and 3PIs Training as One from Village to Global levels in
each of the 193 Member States. Each MSP will speak 6 UN Official Languages.
About
ISPE / EAG
Lanre and
colleagues have for over twenty years made great sacrifices, demonstrated
uncommon zeal and exceptional patriotism in continuing constructive engagement
of relevant sub-national, national and international stakeholders, to jointly
focus on comprehensive systemic solutions to our real and complex national
political, economic, social, security, cultural and religious problems on the
ground.
In this period
we have been working spiritedly towards helping to make Nigeria, Africa, UK,
Europe, US and World Hunger and Poverty history and in record time. In this
period also, our Lanre Rotimi (Nigerian) and Dr. Hellmut Eggers (German) have
created 3PCM, Policy, Program, Project Cycle Management Approach to Benefits
focused National and International Development Cooperation – the most advance
such Approach in our World today. 3PCM has been tried and tested, the Biggest
Test so far in NIPOST 2000 – 2001.
3PCM uses
Living Strategy or Communication Strategy and so it is Dynamic and continuing
to improve daily. Glorious Heights reached by NIPOST at the time has NEVER been
equalled even when NIPOST later received Technical Support from Netherlands /
Dutch Postal Administration. We have built considerable expertise, experience
and exposure in Nigeria, UK and EC that bring Whole of Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe,
US and World Thinking to bear in finding practical solutions to all identified
complex systemic problems in Nigeria, Africa, UK, Europe, US and World, fully
implementing the solutions and effectively monitoring and evaluating this
implementation in ways that achieve increasing convergence between National and
Global Development Cooperation Goals and Targets Intention and Reality and on
scheduled dates.
International
Society for Poverty Elimination, ISPE, Volunteer Organization, is a Member of
Economic Alliance Group, EAG. EAG has the following additional Members:-
1.
AR & Associates Limited, Strategy and
Development Cooperation Consulting Firm – Research, Planning, Statistics,
Implementation, Monitoring, Evaluation, Assessment, Learning, Results,
Advocacy.
2.
EAG - CLEAR, Centre for Learning in Evaluation
and Results, Evaluation Organization
3.
EAG - CDPM, Centre for Development Policy
Management, Research Organization
4.
EAG – FTS / FFS, Farmers Training School / Farmer
Field School, Food and Agriculture Organization
5.
EAG – ETS / EFS, Enterprise Training School /
Enterprise Field School, Entrepreneurship Development Organization
6.
EAG – PSA / PSE – Public Service Academy / Public
Service Exchange, Public Administration Organization
EAG is neutral
in promoting and protecting Sub-national, National and International
Development Cooperation. EAG work towards supporting Developed Countries
Governments; Developing Countries Governments; International Institutions /
International Foundations / Donors; Organized Communities – Neighbourhood to
Global; Media – National and International to JOINTLY Build National and Global
Collective ACTION for achieving Increasing Convergence between National and
Global Development Cooperation Goals and Targets Intention and Reality and on
schedule dates.
The core
business of the Group is the provision of Services for Strategic Management of
Complex National or International or both National and International
Development Change Processes under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial
Services Arrangement.
AR has been in
business since 1993 but registered in Nigeria in 1995. ISPE has been
in business operating as Economic Alliance International (EAI) since 2002 but
registered in Nigeria in 2007. EAG – CLEAR;
EAG – CDPM; EAG – FTS; EAG – ETS; EAG – PSA are for now domiciled in AR.
EAG has in the
past 20 years spent over US$2 Million (N300 Million) to Develop the 3PCM
Approach as well as its National and Global Development Cooperation Practical
Solutions under Blended Volunteer Services and Commercial Services Arrangement
within which we provided the Nigeria Federal Government alone Consultancy
Services worth over UK Pounds 10 Million (N2.5 Billion) Free of Charge. This is
Evidence that we do not have purely Commercial Interest but are Motivated by Service
to Humanity as the Best Work of Life, hence two of our Slogans – Let Us Work
Together to Benefit Together and …Building a Brighter Future as we Configure
our World.
Conclusion
Sustainable Solutions to Poverty, Hunger,
Climate Change, Environmental Degradation and related problems including
Corruption and Terrorism on the ground in Developed and Developing Countries
exist. Ability to successfully implement these solutions with effective
monitoring and evaluation of this implementation exist or can be acquired.
However, the Big Challenge is the Willingness to successfully implement these
solutions with effective monitoring and evaluation of this implementation.
Tackling this Big Challenge is essentially issue of Changing Attitude and
Behaviour at Scale that the ongoing consultations to find answer to AAAA, SDG
and COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc How questions need to effectively
address and in ways that meaningfully connect each Community in each Local
Government in each of the 193 Member States to UN Headquarters.
The Roadmap to Paris will be more
productive and result oriented if Structured and Organized produce COP21
Outcome Document that is Vision and Words with Action thus avoiding Error in
AAAA and SDG and in ways that effectively address overarching Goals of Poverty Elimination and
Environmental Sustainability from the Dimensions
of Trade, Aid, Debts and Corruption with focus on Level 1. Implementation Solutions Level 2. Follow Up and Review Solutions Level 3. Capacity Building – Individual
Level - Hard Competences: Learning and Skills and Soft Competences:
Character, Courage and Mindset; Institution
Level – Resources and Processes empowering the Individual to deploy
Competences towards achieving Corporate Goals and Environment Level – Political, Economic, Social, Cultural, Security
and Religious Space for Institutions and Individuals to Thrive on Chaos,
CommWSDS as well as Communication for WSDS.
There is a need to appreciate that UN,
WBG, IMF, 193 Member States Governments and Partners need Technical Support
from Consultant with required Competences that can help each of the AAAA, SDG
and COP21 Outcome Document etc Stakeholders Stake-holders to correctly identify
where they are now (A); where they need to be to achieve AAAA, SDG and COP21 Outcome
Document Goals and Targets by 2030 (B) and How to move from (A) to (B).
The Bright Prospects of Success
implementing revised AAAA, revised SDG and COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21
etc could be squandered if the needful is not done on time. This is because all
necessary arrangements to identify and fill gaps in AAAA and SDG; prevent such
gaps in COP21 Outcome Document and press forward to fully implement revised
AAAA, revised SDG and COP21 Outcome Document, Agenda 21 etc and effectively
monitor and evaluate this implementation from Village to Global levels in each
of the 193 Member States to achieve Global Goals Targets by 2030 cannot be left
to happen on their own but need to be discussed, negotiated and established and
without delay.
The ultimate consequences of failure to
achieve 2030 Agenda Targets in each of the 193 Member States could be
catastrophic. This is avoidable should World Leaders take positive Action on
ideas and suggestions set out in Paper 1, Paper 2, Paper 3 and supporting
documents – available upon request.
We are willing to offer a more detailed
information / clarification as directed by GA Second Committee and or other
relevant UN Authority.
Contact:
Director General
International
Society for Poverty Elimination / Economic Alliance Group
5, Moses Orimolade
Avenue,
Ijapo Estate,
Akure, Ondo State,
Nigeria.
M: +234-8162469805
Email: nehap.initiative@yahoo.co.uk 16 October 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment